nep-upt New Economics Papers
on Utility Models and Prospect Theory
Issue of 2022‒09‒26
twenty papers chosen by



  1. Exponential utility maximization in small/large financial markets By Mikl\'os R\'asonyi; Hasanjan Sayit
  2. On The History and The Mathematics of The Wold-Juréen (1953) Utility Function, And Its Basis For The Modeling of Giffen Behavior By Sproule, Robert
  3. A trade-off from the future: How risk aversion may explain the demand for illiquid assets By Ferraz, Eduardo; Mantilla, César
  4. Slutsky Matrix Symmetry: A New Behavioral Condition By Victor H. Aguiar; Roberto Serrano
  5. Sensitivity of multi-period optimization problems in adapted Wasserstein distance By Daniel Bartl; Johannes Wiesel
  6. Before and after default: information and optimal portfolio via anticipating calculus By Jos\'e A. Salmer\'on; Giulia Di Nunno; Bernardo D'Auria
  7. Adjacencies on random ordering polytopes and flow polytopes By Jean-Paul Doignon; Kota Saito
  8. Valuing Life over the Life Cycle By Pascal St-Amour
  9. Optimal Delegation in a Multidimensional World By Andreas Kleiner
  10. Optimal design of lottery with cumulative prospect theory By Shunta Akiyama; Mitsuaki Obara; Yasushi Kawase
  11. Voter Turnout in Concurrent Votes By Foellmi, Reto
  12. A Model of Social Duties By Ellingsen, Tore; Mohlin, Erik
  13. Risk-taking and skewness-seeking behavior in a demographically diverse population By Douadia Bougherara; Lana Friesen; Céline Nauges
  14. Vaccination under pessimistic expectations in clinical trials and immunization campaigns By Johanna Etner; Josselin Thuilliez; Hippolyte d'Albis
  15. The First Sale Doctrine and the Digital Challenge to Public Libraries By Imke C. Reimers; Joel Waldfogel
  16. Care for Elderly Parents: Do Children Cooperate? By Bergeot, J.;
  17. A fundamental Game Theoretic model and approximate global Nash Equilibria computation for European Spot Power Markets By Ioan Alexandru Puiu; Raphael Andreas Hauser
  18. Competition, Alignment, and Equilibria in Digital Marketplaces By Meena Jagadeesan; Michael I. Jordan; Nika Haghtalab
  19. Screening With Frames: Implementation in Extensive Form By Franz Ostrizek; Denis Shishkin
  20. "Multi-agent Robust Optimal Investment Problem in Incomplete Market" By Keisuke Kizaki; Taiga Saito; Akihiko Takahashi

  1. By: Mikl\'os R\'asonyi; Hasanjan Sayit
    Abstract: Obtaining utility maximizing optimal portfolios in closed form is a challenging issue when the return vector follows a more general distribution than the normal one. In this note, we give closed form expressions, in markets based on finitely many assets, for optimal portfolios that maximize the expected exponential utility when the return vector follows normal mean-variance mixture models. We then consider large financial markets based on normal mean-variance mixture models also and show that, under exponential utility, the optimal utilities based on small markets converge to the optimal utility in the large financial market. This result shows, in particular, that to reach optimal utility level investors need to diversify their portfolios to include infinitely many assets into their portfolio and with portfolios based on any set of only finitely many assets, they never be able to reach optimum level of utility. In this paper, we also consider portfolio optimization problems with more general class of utility functions and provide an easy-to-implement numerical procedure for locating optimal portfolios. Especially, our approach in this part of the paper reduces a high dimensional problem in locating optimal portfolio into a three dimensional problem for a general class of utility functions.
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2208.06549&r=
  2. By: Sproule, Robert
    Abstract: Twenty years ago, Peter Moffatt (2002) posed this general question: “Is Giffen behavior compatible with the axioms of consumer theory?” The present paper addresses this very same question, but only as it applies to the Wold-Juréen (1953) utility function. In this paper, we demonstrate that the Wold-Juréen (1953) utility function exhibits both Giffenity and compatibility with the axioms of consumer theory. Our singular interest in the Wold-Juréen (1953) utility function stems from the fact that this utility function continues to be the preeminent theoretical benchmark in the study of Giffenity.
    Keywords: Wold-Juréen (1953) utility function,Slutsky decomposition,Giffen Behavior,Axioms of Consumer Theory
    JEL: A22 A23 D11
    Date: 2022
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:esprep:263912&r=
  3. By: Ferraz, Eduardo; Mantilla, César
    Abstract: We use a three-period model adopting a recursive definition of consumption to explore the optimal delegation that a present self, aware that her near-future self is present-biased but better informed, will make to protect her far-future self against income shocks. The model captures the present self's trade-off between using commitment mechanisms, restricting the near-future self's agency through illiquid savings, and profiting from the near-future self's better information about future shocks. Our main result states that agents with higher risk aversion can cover better against utility losses from time-inconsistent consumption through the commitment mechanism. Given the evidence of women being more risk-averse than men, this result provides the micro-foundation for the gender gap in adopting financial commitment devices, especially among single individuals.
    Keywords: commitment devices; dynamic inconsistency; Epstein-Zin preferences; present bias
    JEL: D11 D81 D90 G40
    Date: 2022–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:rie:riecdt:97&r=
  4. By: Victor H. Aguiar (University of Western Ontario); Roberto Serrano (Brown University)
    Abstract: The Slutsky matrix function encodes all the information about local variations in demand with respect to small (Slutsky) compensated price changes. When the demand function is the result of utility maximization the Slutsky matrix is symmetric. However, symmetry does not imply rationality. Here, we provide a necessary and sufficient condition for Slutsky symmetry. The new condition requires symmetric attention to compensated price-paths.
    Keywords: Utility Maximization, Slutsky Matrix
    JEL: C50 C51 C52 C91
    Date: 2022
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uwo:uwowop:20228&r=
  5. By: Daniel Bartl; Johannes Wiesel
    Abstract: We analyze the effect of small changes in the underlying probabilistic model on the value of multi-period stochastic optimization problems and optimal stopping problems. We work in finite discrete time and measure these changes with the adapted Wasserstein distance. We prove explicit first-order approximations for both problems. Expected utility maximization is discussed as a special case.
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2208.05656&r=
  6. By: Jos\'e A. Salmer\'on; Giulia Di Nunno; Bernardo D'Auria
    Abstract: Default risk calculus emerges naturally in a portfolio optimization problem when the risky asset is threatened with a bankruptcy. The usual stochastic control techniques do not hold in this case and some additional assumptions are generally added to achieve the optimization in a before-and-after default context. We show how it is possible to avoid one of theses restrictive assumptions, the so-called Jacod density hypothesis, by using the framework of the forward integration. In particular, in the logarithmic utility case, in order to get the optimal portfolio the right condition it is proved to be the intensity hypothesis. We use the anticipating calculus to analyze the existence of the optimal portfolio for the logarithmic utility, and than under the assumption of existence of the optimal portfolio we prove the semimartingale decomposition of the risky asset in the filtration enlarged with the default process.
    Date: 2022–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2208.07163&r=
  7. By: Jean-Paul Doignon; Kota Saito
    Abstract: The Multiple Choice Polytope (MCP) is the prediction range of a random utility model due to Block and Marschak (1960). Fishburn (1998) offers a nice survey of the findings on random utility models at the time. A complete characterization of the MCP is a remarkable achievement of Falmagne (1978). Apart for a recognition of the facets by Suck (2002), the geometric structure of the MCP was apparently not much investigated. Recently, Chang, Narita and Saito (2022) refer to the adjacency of vertices while Turansick (2022) uses a condition which we show to be equivalent to the non-adjacency of two vertices. We characterize the adjacency of vertices and the adjacency of facets. To derive a more enlightening proof of Falmagne Theorem and of Suck result, Fiorini (2004) assimilates the MCP with the flow polytope of some acyclic network. Our results on adjacencies also hold for the flow polytope of any acyclic network. In particular, they apply not only to the MCP, but also to three polytopes which Davis-Stober, Doignon, Fiorini, Glineur and Regenwetter (2018) introduced as extended formulations of the weak order polytope, interval order polytope and semiorder polytope (the prediction ranges of other models, see for instance Fishburn and Falmagne, 1989, and Marley and Regenwetter, 2017).
    Date: 2022–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2207.06925&r=
  8. By: Pascal St-Amour (University of Lausanne - School of Economics and Business Administration (HEC-Lausanne); Swiss Finance Institute)
    Abstract: The twin arguments of (i) protecting society's most vulnerable members (e.g. agents with pre-existing medical conditions, elders) from life-threatening complications and (ii) avoiding delicate medical triage decisions were often used to warrant the substantial reallocation of economic and health care resources during the COVID-19 pandemic. These justifications raise the non-trivial arbitrage between the value of lives saved by intervention vs (i) the opportunity cost of engaged resources and vs (ii) other present or future lives affected by prioritizing a single illness. This paper solves in closed- form a flexible life cycle (LC) model of consumption, leisure and health choices to characterize the shadow value of life along the (i) person-specific (age, health, labour income, wealth, preferences) and (ii) mortality risk-specific (beneficial vs detrimental, temporary vs permanent changes) dimensions. The model is calibrated to reproduce observed household LC dynamics and yields plausible out-of-sample life values with a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) estimates between 95 and 115K$ and a Value of Statistical Life (VSL) close to 6.0M$. It identifies symmetric willingness to pay (WTP) and to accept (WTA) compensation for one-shot beneficial vs detrimental changes in longevity. Permanent changes yield asymmetric responses with larger willingness in the gains relative to loss domain and larger selling (WTA) relative to buying (WTP) prices for longevity. Ageing lowers both the value of and responsiveness to changes in longevity via falling resources and health and marginal continuation utility of living.
    Keywords: Value of Human Life, Value of Statistical Life, Gunpoint Value, Deterministic Longevity Value, Hicksian Compensating and Equivalent Variations, Willingness to Pay, Willingness to Accept Compensation, Mortality, Longevity, Non-Expected Utility.
    JEL: J17 D15 G11
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:chf:rpseri:rp2262&r=
  9. By: Andreas Kleiner
    Abstract: We study a model of delegation in which a principal takes a multidimensional action and an agent has private information about a multidimensional state of the world. The principal can design any direct mechanism, including stochastic ones. We provide necessary and sufficient conditions for an arbitrary mechanism to maximize the principal's expected payoff. We also discuss simple conditions which ensure that some convex delegation set is optimal. A key step of our analysis shows that a mechanism is incentive compatible if and only if its induced indirect utility is convex and lies below the agent's first-best payoff.
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2208.11835&r=
  10. By: Shunta Akiyama; Mitsuaki Obara; Yasushi Kawase
    Abstract: A lottery is a popular form of gambling between a seller and multiple buyers, and its profitable design is of primary interest to the seller. Designing a lottery requires modeling the buyer decision-making process for uncertain outcomes. One of the most promising descriptive models of such decision-making is the cumulative prospect theory (CPT), which represents people's different attitudes towards gain and loss, and their overestimation of extreme events. In this study, we design a lottery that maximizes the seller's profit when the buyers follow CPT. The derived problem is nonconvex and constrained, and hence, it is challenging to directly characterize its optimal solution. We overcome this difficulty by reformulating the problem as a three-level optimization problem. The reformulation enables us to characterize the optimal solution. Based on this characterization, we propose an algorithm that computes the optimal lottery in linear time with respect to the number of lottery tickets. In addition, we provide an efficient algorithm for a more general setting in which the ticket price is constrained. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study that employs the CPT framework for designing an optimal lottery.
    Date: 2022–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2209.00822&r=
  11. By: Foellmi, Reto
    Abstract: This paper studies voter turnout in concurrent votes. We develop a theoretical model that incorporates proposition salience and two types of voting costs. The first type is fixed costs of going to the polls that are to be paid only once per voting day. The second type is information costs that must be paid for each vote separately. Our model explains how the net benefit of concurrent votes, defined as salience minus information costs, enters a voter's utility function and thereby affects turnout. We test our model predictions using data on concurrent propositions in Switzerland from 1981-2016. Our results suggest that both the proposition with the highest net benefit and the sum of the net benefits of all concurrent propositions are important determinants of the individual turnout decision. We also find that the marginal impact on turnout rises with the net benefit of a proposition.
    Keywords: Concurrent votes, turnout, rational voter model, referendums
    JEL: D72 D90
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:usg:econwp:2022:09&r=
  12. By: Ellingsen, Tore (Department of Economics, Stockholm School of Economics); Mohlin, Erik (Department of Economics, Lund University)
    Abstract: We develop a formal model of social duties. Duties to respect entitlements (duties of justice) differ from duties to promote well-being (duties of charity). A situation- specific version of our model takes entitlements as primitives. A fully portable ver- sion derives entitlements from situational characteristics. Utility functions obtain kinks where duties of justice and charity are exactly satisfied. Actions at these kinks are candidates for descriptive social norms. Empirically, duties are identified using Krupka-Weber appropriateness ratings, with negative ratings indicating entitlement violations. The model’s predictions are confronted with established regularities and new survey evidence in seven pre-registered applications.
    Keywords: Social norms; Social morality; Entitlements; Dutifulness; Charity
    JEL: D91 Z13
    Date: 2022–08–24
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:lunewp:2022_014&r=
  13. By: Douadia Bougherara (CEE-M - Centre d'Economie de l'Environnement - Montpellier - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement - Institut Agro Montpellier - Institut Agro - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement - UM - Université de Montpellier); Lana Friesen (University of Queensland [Brisbane]); Céline Nauges (TSE - Toulouse School of Economics - UT1 - Université Toulouse 1 Capitole - Université Fédérale Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
    Abstract: We study the interaction between risk-taking and skewness-seeking behavior among a demographically diverse sample of French adults using an experiment that elicits certainty equivalent over lotteries that vary the second and third moments orthogonally. We find that the most common behavior is risk avoidance and skewness seeking. On average, we find no interaction between the two, and a weakly significant interaction only in some segments of the population. That is, in most cases, skewness seeking is not affected by the variance of the lotteries involved, nor is risk taking affected by the skewness of the lotteries. We also find a significant positive correlation between risk-avoiding and skewness-seeking behavior. Older and female participants make more risk-avoiding and more skewness-seeking choices, while less educated people and those not in executive occupations are more skewness seeking. Estimated decision models show that utility curvature, likelihood sensitivity, and optimism can explain the observed behaviors.
    Keywords: Risk,Skewness,Certainty Equivalent,Experiment
    Date: 2022–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03739823&r=
  14. By: Johanna Etner (EconomiX - UPN - Université Paris Nanterre - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique); Josselin Thuilliez (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique); Hippolyte d'Albis (PSE - Paris School of Economics - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris sciences et lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, PJSE - Paris Jourdan Sciences Economiques - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - ENS-PSL - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris sciences et lettres - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
    Abstract: We provide one of the first formalizations of a vaccination campaign in a decisiontheoretic framework. We analyse a model where an ambiguity-averse individual must decide how much effort to invest into prevention in the context of a rampant disease. We study how ambiguity aversion affects the effort and the estimation of the vaccine efficacy in clinical trials and immunization campaigns. We find that the behaviours of individuals participating in a clinical trial differ from individuals not participating. Individuals who are more optimistic toward vaccination participate more in trials. Their behaviours and efforts are also affected. As a result, because vaccine efficacy depends on unobserved behaviours and efforts, the biological effect of the vaccine becomes difficult to evaluate. During the scale-up phase of a vaccination campaign, provided that vaccine efficacy is established, we show that vaccine hesitancy may still be rational.
    Keywords: Decision Theory,Vaccination,Clinical Trials,Immunization Campaigns Decision Theory,Immunization Campaigns
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:psewpa:halshs-03763363&r=
  15. By: Imke C. Reimers; Joel Waldfogel
    Abstract: Libraries have traditionally provided free communal access to books, facilitated by the first sale doctrine's (FSD) guarantee that libraries may purchase physical books at consumer prices. Increasingly restrictive ebook access terms may imperil libraries, and we compare the welfare cost of higher ebook prices to the welfare benefit of the FSD's guarantee of low physical book prices for libraries and their patrons. Using data on over 8,000 library systems for 2013-2019, we measure the impacts of physical and electronic holdings on the respective formats' circulation. We then build a structural model of the library market, and we rationalize the status quo book holdings with a librarian utility function that attaches higher weights to electronic circulation. While higher counterfactual ebook prices would induce libraries to substitute physical for electronic holdings, this would have little effect on patron CS because of consumer willingness to substitute. By contrast, higher physical book prices, as would prevail absent the first sale doctrine, reduce CS by almost ten times as much as an analogous ebook price increase.
    JEL: H42 L82 O34
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:30392&r=
  16. By: Bergeot, J.;
    Abstract: Do children cooperate when they decide to provide informal care to their elderly parent? This paper assesses which model drives the caregiving decisions of children. I compare the pre-dictive power of two models: a (joint-utility) cooperative and a Nash noncooperative model. I focus on families with two children and one single parent. e model allows caregiving by one child to have a direct externality on the well-being of the sibling. The results suggest that the cooperative model overestimates the level of care received by the parents observed in the data and its predictive power is outperformed by the noncooperative model. is suggests that children are more likely to behave according to a noncooperative model. I also find that children’s participation in caregiving has a positive externality on the well-being of the sibling. I construct an indicator of the degree of noncooperativeness between children and show that it is positively correlated with the number of unmet needs the parent has. I conclude that, because children do not internalize the positive externality when they behave noncooperatively, the current level of informal care provided to parents appears to suffer from a public good problem.
    Date: 2022–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:yor:hectdg:22/13&r=
  17. By: Ioan Alexandru Puiu; Raphael Andreas Hauser
    Abstract: Spot electricity markets are considered under a Game-Theoretic framework, where risk averse players submit orders to the market clearing mechanism to maximise their own utility. Consistent with the current practice in Europe, the market clearing mechanism is modelled as a Social Welfare Maximisation problem, with zonal pricing, and we consider inflexible demand, physical constraints of the electricity grid, and capacity-constrained producers. A novel type of non-parametric risk aversion based on a defined worst case scenario is introduced, and this reduces the dimensionality of the strategy variables and ensures boundedness of prices. By leveraging these properties we devise Jacobi and Gauss-Seidel iterative schemes for computation of approximate global Nash Equilibria, which are in contrast to derivative based local equilibria. Our methodology is applied to the real world data of Central Western European (CWE) Spot Market during the 2019-2020 period, and offers a good representation of the historical time series of prices. By also solving for the assumption of truthful bidding, we devise a simple method based on hypothesis testing to infer if and when producers are bidding strategically (instead of truthfully), and we find evidence suggesting that strategic bidding may be fairly pronounced in the CWE region.
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2208.14164&r=
  18. By: Meena Jagadeesan; Michael I. Jordan; Nika Haghtalab
    Abstract: Competition between traditional platforms is known to improve user utility by aligning the platform's actions with user preferences. But to what extent is alignment exhibited in data-driven marketplaces? To study this question from a theoretical perspective, we introduce a duopoly market where platform actions are bandit algorithms and the two platforms compete for user participation. A salient feature of this market is that the quality of recommendations depends on both the bandit algorithm and the amount of data provided by interactions from users. This interdependency between the algorithm performance and the actions of users complicates the structure of market equilibria and their quality in terms of user utility. Our main finding is that competition in this market does not perfectly align market outcomes with user utility. Interestingly, market outcomes exhibit misalignment not only when the platforms have separate data repositories, but also when the platforms have a shared data repository. Nonetheless, the data sharing assumptions impact what mechanism drives misalignment and also affect the specific form of misalignment (e.g. the quality of the best-case and worst-case market outcomes). More broadly, our work illustrates that competition in digital marketplaces has subtle consequences for user utility that merit further investigation.
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2208.14423&r=
  19. By: Franz Ostrizek; Denis Shishkin
    Abstract: We study a decision-framing design problem: a principal faces an agent with frame-dependent preferences and designs an extensive form with a frame at each stage. This allows the principal to circumvent incentive compatibility constraints by inducing dynamically inconsistent choices of the sophisticated agent. We show that a vector of contracts can be implemented if and only if it can be implemented using a canonical extensive form, which has a simple high-low-high structure using only three stages and the two highest frames, and employs unchosen decoy contracts to deter deviations. We then turn to the study of optimal contracts in the context of the classic monopolistic screening problem and establish the existence of a canonical optimal mechanism, even though our implementability result does not directly apply. In the presence of naive types, the principal can perfectly screen by cognitive type and extract full surplus from naifs.
    Keywords: Implementation, Screening, Framing, Extensive-Form Decision Problems, Dynamic Inconsistency, Sophistication, Naivete
    JEL: D42 D82 D90 L12
    Date: 2022–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2022_364&r=
  20. By: Keisuke Kizaki (Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo); Taiga Saito (Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo); Akihiko Takahashi (Faculty of Economics, The University of Tokyo)
    Abstract: This paper considers a multi-agent optimal investment problem with conservative sentiments in an incomplete market by a BSDE approach. Particularly, we formulate the conservative sentiments of the agents by a sup-inf/inf-sup problem where we take infimum on a choice of a probability measure and supremum on trading strategies. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to investigate a multi-agent equilibrium model in an incomplete setting with heterogeneous views on Brownian motions. Moreover, we show two cases where the trading strategies and the excess return process of the risky asset in equilibrium are explicitly solved. Finally, we present numerical examples of the trading strategies and the expected return process in equilibrium under conservative sentiments, which explain how the sentiments affect the trading strategies of the agents and the expected return process of the risky asset.
    Date: 2022–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:tky:fseres:2022cf1198&r=

General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.