nep-upt New Economics Papers
on Utility Models and Prospect Theory
Issue of 2021‒11‒29
fifteen papers chosen by



  1. Randomize at your own risk: on the observability of ambiguity aversion By Aurelien Baillon; Yoram Halevy; Chen Li
  2. Asymptotically Optimal Control of a Centralized Dynamic Matching Market with General Utilities By Blanchet, Jose H.; Reiman, Martin I.; Shah, Virag; Wein, Lawrence M.; Wu, Linjia
  3. Surreal Decisions By Eddy Keming Chen; Daniel Rubio
  4. Reference Points and the Tradeoff Between Risk and Incentives By Thomas Dohmen; Arjan Non; Tom Stolp
  5. Optimal liquidation trajectories for the Almgren-Chriss model By Lokka, A.; Xu, Junwei
  6. Buy It Now, or Later, or Not Loss Aversion in Advance Purchasing By Senran Lin
  7. Solution to the Equity Premium Puzzle Using the Sufficiency Factor of the Model By Atilla Aras
  8. Experimental elicitation of ambiguity attitude using the random incentive system By Aurelien Baillon; Yoram Halevy; Chen Li
  9. Fair Utilitarianism By Marc Fleurbaey; Stéphane Zuber
  10. Uncertainty and Compound Lotteries: Calibration By Yoram Halevy; Emre Ozdenoren
  11. Risk and Time Preferences of Poor Urban Households in Saudi Arabia By Lily, Miriam Al; Liebenehm, Sabine; Waibel, Hermann
  12. Redistribution with labor market frictions By Costa, Carlos Eugênio da; Maestri, Lucas Jóver; Santos, Marcelo Rodrigues dos
  13. The Murder-Suicide of the Rentier: Population Aging and the Risk Premium By Joseph Kopecky; Alan M. Taylor
  14. Optimal market making under partial information with general intensities By Campi, Luciano; Zabaljauregui, Diego
  15. A General Revealed Preference Test for Quasilinear Preferences: Theory and Experiments By Mikhail Freer; Marco Castillo

  1. By: Aurelien Baillon; Yoram Halevy; Chen Li
    Abstract: Facing several decisions, people may consider each one in isolation or integrate them into a single optimization problem. Isolation and integration may yield different choices, for instance, if uncertainty is involved, and only one randomly selected decision is implemented. We investigate whether the random incentive system in experiments that measure ambiguity aversion provides a hedge against ambiguity, making ambiguity-averse subjects who integrate behave as if they were ambiguity neutral. Our results suggest that about half of the ambiguity averse subjects integrated their choices in the experiment into a single problem, whereas the other half isolated. Our design further enable us to disentangle properties of the integrating subjects' preferences over compound objects induced by the random incentive system and the choice problems in the experiment.
    Keywords: hedging, random incentives, Ellsberg, ambiguity aversion, design of experiments, integration, isolation, narrow bracketing, narrow framing
    JEL: C81 C91 D81
    Date: 2021–11–15
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:tor:tecipa:tecipa-712&r=
  2. By: Blanchet, Jose H. (Stanford U); Reiman, Martin I. (Columbia U); Shah, Virag (Stanford U); Wein, Lawrence M. (Stanford U); Wu, Linjia (Stanford U)
    Abstract: We consider a matching market where buyers and sellers arrive according to independent Poisson processes at the same rate and independently abandon the market if not matched after an exponential amount of time with the same mean. In this centralized market, the utility for the system manager from matching any buyer and any seller is a general random variable. We consider a sequence of systems indexed by n where the arrivals in the nth system are sped up by a factor of n. We analyze two families of one-parameter policies: the population threshold policy immediately matches an arriving agent to its best available mate only if the number of mates in the system is above a threshold, and the utility threshold policy matches an arriving agent to its best available mate only if the corresponding utility is above a threshold. Using an asymptotic fluid analysis of the two-dimensional Markov process of buyers and sellers, we show that when the matching utility distribution is light-tailed, the population threshold policy with threshold n/ln n is asymptotically optimal among all policies that make matches only at agent arrival epochs. In the heavy-tailed case, we characterize the optimal threshold level for both policies. We also study the utility threshold policy in an unbalanced matching market with heavy-tailed matching utilities, and find that the buyers and sellers have the same asymptotically optimal utility threshold. To illustrate our theoretical results, we use extreme value theory to derive optimal thresholds when the matching utility distribution is exponential, uniform, Pareto, and correlated Pareto. In general, we find that as the right tail of the matching utility distribution gets heavier, the threshold level of each policy (and hence market thickness) increases, as does the magnitude by which the utility threshold policy outperforms the population threshold policy.
    Date: 2020–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ecl:stabus:3916&r=
  3. By: Eddy Keming Chen; Daniel Rubio
    Abstract: Although expected utility theory has proven a fruitful and elegant theory in the finite realm, attempts to generalize it to infinite values have resulted in many paradoxes. In this paper, we argue that the use of John Conway's surreal numbers shall provide a firm mathematical foundation for transfinite decision theory. To that end, we prove a surreal representation theorem and show that our surreal decision theory respects dominance reasoning even in the case of infinite values. We then bring our theory to bear on one of the more venerable decision problems in the literature: Pascal's Wager. Analyzing the wager showcases our theory's virtues and advantages. To that end, we analyze two objections against the wager: Mixed Strategies and Many Gods. After formulating the two objections in the framework of surreal utilities and probabilities, our theory correctly predicts that (1) the pure Pascalian strategy beats all mixed strategies, and (2) what one should do in a Pascalian decision problem depends on what one's credence function is like. Our analysis therefore suggests that although Pascal's Wager is mathematically coherent, it does not deliver what it purports to, a rationally compelling argument that people should lead a religious life regardless of how confident they are in theism and its alternatives.
    Date: 2021–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2111.00862&r=
  4. By: Thomas Dohmen; Arjan Non; Tom Stolp
    Abstract: We conduct laboratory experiments to investigate basic predictions of principal-agent theory about the choice of piece rate contracts in the presence of output risk, and provide novel insights that reference dependent preferences affect the tradeoff between risk and incentives. Subjects in our experiments choose their compensation for performing a real-effort task from a menu of linear piece rate and fixed payment combinations. As classical principal-agent models predict, more risk averse individuals choose lower piece rates. However, in contrast to those predictions, we find that low-productivity risk averse workers choose higher piece rates when the riskiness of the environment increases. We hypothesize that reference points affect piece rate choice in risky environments, such that individuals whose expected earnings would exceed (fall below) the reference point in a risk-free environment behave risk averse (seeking) in risky environments. In a second experiment, we exogenously manipulate reference points and confirm this hypothesis.
    Keywords: Incentive, piece-rate, risk, reference point, laboratory experiment
    JEL: D81 D91 M52
    Date: 2021–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bon:boncrc:crctr224_2021_322&r=
  5. By: Lokka, A.; Xu, Junwei
    Abstract: We consider an optimal liquidation problem with infinite horizon in the Almgren–Chriss framework, where the unaffected asset price follows a Lévy process. The temporary price impact is described by a general function that satisfies some reasonable conditions. We consider a market agent with constant absolute risk aversion, who wants to maximize the expected utility of the cash received from the sale of the agent’s assets, and show that this problem can be reduced to a deterministic optimization problem that we are able to solve explicitly. In order to compare our results with exponential Lévy models, which provide a very good statistical fit with observed asset price data for short time horizons, we derive the (linear) Lévy process approximation of such models. In particular we derive expressions for the Lévy process approximation of the exponential variance–gamma Lévy process, and study properties of the corresponding optimal liquidation strategy. We then provide a comparison of the liquidation trajectories for reasonable parameters between the Lévy process model and the classical Almgren–Chriss model. In particular, we obtain an explicit expression for the connection between the temporary impact function for the Lévy model and the temporary impact function for the Brownian motion model (the classical Almgren–Chriss model), for which the optimal liquidation trajectories for the two models coincide.
    Keywords: Lévy processes; Almgren-Chriss model; algorithmic trading; optimal liquidation; optimal execution; constant absolute risk aversion; market impact; optimal control; Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation
    JEL: F3 G3
    Date: 2020–11–28
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ehl:lserod:106977&r=
  6. By: Senran Lin
    Abstract: This paper studies the advance-purchase problem when a consumer has reference-dependent preferences in the form of Koszegi and Rabin (2009), in which planning affects reference formation. When the consumer exhibits plan revisability, loss aversion increases the price at which she is willing to pre-purchase. This implies that loss aversion can lead to risk-seeking. Moreover, I endogenize the seller$'$s price-commitment behavior in the advance-purchase problem. The result shows that the seller commits to his spot price even if he is not obliged to, which was treated as a given assumption in previous literature.
    Date: 2021–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2110.14929&r=
  7. By: Atilla Aras
    Abstract: This study provides the solution to the equity premium puzzle. The new model was developed by including the behavior of investors toward risk in financial markets in prior studies. The calculations of this newly tested model show that the value of the coefficient of relative risk aversion is 1.033526 by assuming the value of the subjective time discount factor to be 0.99. Since these values are compatible with the existing empirical studies, they confirm the validity of the newly derived model that provides the solution to the equity premium puzzle.
    Date: 2021–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2110.14405&r=
  8. By: Aurelien Baillon; Yoram Halevy; Chen Li
    Abstract: We demonstrate how the standard usage of the random incentive system in ambiguity experiments eliciting certainty and probability equivalents might not be incentive compatible if the decision-maker is ambiguity averse. We propose a slight modification of the procedure in which the randomization takes place before decisions are made and the state is realized, and prove that if subjects evaluate the experimental environment in that way (first - risk, second - uncertainty), incentive compatibility may be restored.
    Keywords: incentive compatibility, certainty equivalent, probability equivalents, broad bracketing, Ellsberg, BDM, choice list, MPL
    JEL: C81 C91 D81
    Date: 2021–11–14
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:tor:tecipa:tecipa-711&r=
  9. By: Marc Fleurbaey (PSE - Paris School of Economics - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - ENS Paris - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris sciences et lettres - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement); Stéphane Zuber (PSE - Paris School of Economics - ENPC - École des Ponts ParisTech - ENS Paris - École normale supérieure - Paris - PSL - Université Paris sciences et lettres - UP1 - Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique - EHESS - École des hautes études en sciences sociales - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
    Abstract: Utilitarianism plays a central role in economics, but there is a gap between theory, where utilitarianism is dominant, and applications, where monetary criteria are often used. For applications, a key difficulty is to define how utilities should be measured and compared. Drawing on Harsanyi's (1955) approach, we introduce a new normalization of utilities ensuring that: (i) a transfer from a rich population to a poor population is welfare enhancing, and (ii) populations with more risk-averse people have lower welfare. We study some implications of this "fair utilitarianism" for risk sharing, collective risk aversion, and the design of health policy. (JEL D63, D81)
    Date: 2021–05–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03426179&r=
  10. By: Yoram Halevy; Emre Ozdenoren
    Abstract: The Ellsberg experiments provide an intuitive illustration that the Savage approach, which reduces subjective uncertainty to risk, is not rich enough to capture many decision makers' preferences. Experimental evidence suggests that decision makers reduce uncertainty to compound risk. This work presents a theoretical model of decision making in which preferences are defined on both Savage subjective acts and compound objective lotteries. Preferences are two-stage probabilistically sophisticated when the ranking of acts corresponds to a ranking of the respective compound lotteries induced by the acts through the decision maker's subjective belief. This family of preferences includes various theoretical models that have been proposed in the literature to accommodate non-neutral attitude towards ambiguity. The principle of calibration, which was used by Ramsey and de Finetti, allows an outside observer to relate preferences over acts and compound objective lotteries. If preferences abide by the calibration axioms, the evaluation of the compound lottery induced by an act through the subjective belief coincides with the valuation of the corresponding compound objective lottery. Calibration provides a foundation to formalize and understand the tight empirical association between probabilistic sophistication and reduction of compound lotteries, for all two-stage probabilistically sophisticated preferences.
    Keywords: ambiguity, probabilistic sophistication, reduction of compound lotteries, Ellsberg
    JEL: D81
    Date: 2021–11–18
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:tor:tecipa:tecipa-713&r=
  11. By: Lily, Miriam Al; Liebenehm, Sabine; Waibel, Hermann
    Keywords: Risk and Uncertainty, Consumer/Household Economics
    Date: 2021–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iaae21:315152&r=
  12. By: Costa, Carlos Eugênio da; Maestri, Lucas Jóver; Santos, Marcelo Rodrigues dos
    Abstract: How should search frictions in the labor market affect distributive policies? Can we assess current real-world policies? After building a framework for answering these questions we show that any constrained efficient allocation must satisfy the following set of testable restrictions: i) earnings and employment probability must be co-monotone, ii) wedges on taxable income and employment probability must have the same sign; and; iii) wedges at the bottom of the distribution of income should be positive. Labor income tax schedules and unemployment benefits are shown not to suffice for implementing constrained efficient allocations. Firms can nonetheless be provided incentives to generate the efficient supply of vacancies using informationally feasible tax instruments. We devise a method for the quantitative assessment of inefficiency, calibrate our model to the U.S. economy, and find that it is possible to increase government revenues by 3.48% while preserving everyone’s utility
    Date: 2021–10–15
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fgv:epgewp:826&r=
  13. By: Joseph Kopecky (Department of Economics, Trinity College Dublin); Alan M. Taylor (Department of Economics and Graduate School of Management, University of California, Davis)
    Abstract: Population aging has been linked to global declines in real interest rates. A similar trend is seen for equity risk premia, which are on the rise. An existing literature can explain part of the declining trend in safe rates using demographics, but has no mechanism to speak to trends in relative returns on different assets. We calibrate a heterogeneous agent life-cycle model with equity markets and aggregate risk, and we show that aging demographics can simultaneously account for both the majority of a downward trend in the risk free rate, while also increasing the return premium attached to risky assets. This is because the life-cycle savings dynamics that have been well documented exert less pressure on risky assets as older households shift away from risk. Under reasonable calibrations we find declines in the safe rate that are considerably larger than most existing estimates between the years 1990 and 2017. We are also able to account for most of the rise in the equity risk premium. Projecting forward to 2050 we show that persistent demographic forces will continue to push the risk free rate further into negative territory, while the equity risk premium remains elevated.
    Keywords: life-cycle model, demographics, rates of return, safe assets, risky assets, secular stagnation
    JEL: E21 E43 G11 J11
    Date: 2020–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:tcd:tcduee:tep1220&r=
  14. By: Campi, Luciano; Zabaljauregui, Diego
    Abstract: Starting from the Avellaneda–Stoikov framework, we consider a market maker who wants to optimally set bid/ask quotes over a finite time horizon, to maximize her expected utility. The intensities of the orders she receives depend not only on the spreads she quotes but also on unobservable factors modelled by a hidden Markov chain. We tackle this stochastic control problem under partial information with a model that unifies and generalizes many existing ones under full information, combining several risk metrics and constraints, and using general decreasing intensity functionals. We use stochastic filtering, control and piecewise-deterministic Markov processes theory, to reduce the dimensionality of the problem and characterize the reduced value function as the unique continuous viscosity solution of its dynamic programming equation. We then solve the analogous full information problem and compare the results numerically through a concrete example. We show that the optimal full information spreads are biased when the exact market regime is unknown, and the market maker needs to adjust for additional regime uncertainty in terms of P&L sensitivity and observed order flow volatility. This effect becomes higher, the longer the waiting time in between orders.
    Keywords: algorithmic trading; hidden Markov model; high-frequency trading; Market making; piecewise-deterministic Markov processes; stochastic filtering; stochastic optimal control; viscosity solutions
    JEL: L81 F3 G3
    Date: 2020–05–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ehl:lserod:104612&r=
  15. By: Mikhail Freer; Marco Castillo
    Abstract: We provide a generalized revealed preference test for quasilinear preferences. The test applies to nonlinear budget sets and non-convex preferences as those found in taxation and nonlinear pricing contexts. We study the prevalence of quasilinear preferences in a laboratory real-effort task experiment with nonlinear wages. The experiment demonstrates the empirical relevance of our test. We find support for either convex (non-separable) preferences or quasilinear preferences but weak support for the hypothesis of both quasilinear and convex preferences.
    Date: 2021–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2111.01248&r=

General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.