nep-upt New Economics Papers
on Utility Models and Prospect Theory
Issue of 2011‒04‒30
three papers chosen by
Alexander Harin
Modern University for the Humanities

  1. Tempus Fugit: Time Pressure in Risky Decisions By Kocher, Martin G.; Pahlke, Julius; Trautmann, Stefan T.
  2. Discounting Models for Outcomes over Continuous Time By Charles M. Harvey; Lars Peter Østerdal
  3. The Riskiness of Risk Models By Christophe Boucher; Bertrand Maillet

  1. By: Kocher, Martin G.; Pahlke, Julius; Trautmann, Stefan T.
    Abstract: We study the effects of time pressure on risky decisions for pure gain prospects, pure loss prospects, and mixed prospects involving both gains and losses. In an experiment we find that risk aversion for gains is robust under time pressure whereas risk seeking for losses turns into risk aversion under time pressure. For mixed prospects, subjects become more loss averse and more gain seeking under time pressure, depending on the framing of the prospects. The results suggest the importance of aspiration levels under time pressure. We discuss the implications of our findings for decision making situations that involve time pressure.
    Keywords: time pressure; risky decisions; risk aversion; loss aversion; gain seeking; aspiration level
    JEL: C91 D81
    Date: 2011–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:lmu:muenec:12221&r=upt
  2. By: Charles M. Harvey (University of Houston); Lars Peter Østerdal (Department of Economics, University of Copenhagen)
    Abstract: Events that occur over a period of time can be described either as sequences of outcomes at discrete times or as functions of outcomes in an interval of time. This paper presents discounting models for events of the latter type. Conditions on preferences are shown to be satisfied if and only if the preferences are represented by a function that is an integral of a discounting function times a scale defined on outcomes at instants of time.
    Keywords: continuous time; integral discounting; integral value or utility function
    Date: 2011–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:kud:kuiedp:1112&r=upt
  3. By: Christophe Boucher (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - CNRS : UMR8174 - Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - Paris I, A.A.Advisors-QCG - ABN AMRO); Bertrand Maillet (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - CNRS : UMR8174 - Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - Paris I, A.A.Advisors-QCG - ABN AMRO, EIF - Europlace Institute of Finance)
    Abstract: We provide an economic valuation of the riskiness of risk models by directly measuring the impact of model risks (specification and estimation risks) on VaR estimates. We find that integrating the model risk into the VaR computations implies a substantial minimum correction of the order of 10-40% of VaR levels. We also present results of a practical method - based on a backtesting framework - for incorporating the model risk into the VaR estimates.
    Keywords: Model risk, quantile estimation, VaR, Basel II validation test.
    Date: 2011–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:cesptp:halshs-00587779&r=upt

This nep-upt issue is ©2011 by Alexander Harin. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.