nep-upt New Economics Papers
on Utility Models and Prospect Theory
Issue of 2009‒01‒10
four papers chosen by
Alexander Harin
Modern University for the Humanities

  1. A Risk Analysis of Converting CRP Acres to a Wheat-Sorghum-Fallow Rotation By Williams, Jeffery R.; Llewelyn, Richard V.; Pendell, Dustin L.; Schlegel, Alan; Troy, Dumler
  2. The rigidity of choice: Lifecycle savings with information-processing limits By Antonella Tutino
  3. Skill, Luck, Overconfidence, and Risk Taking By Natalia Karelaia; Robin Hogarth
  4. On the Empirical Relevance of St.Petersburg Lotteries By James C. Cox; Vjollca Sadiraj; Bodo Vogt

  1. By: Williams, Jeffery R.; Llewelyn, Richard V.; Pendell, Dustin L.; Schlegel, Alan; Troy, Dumler
    Abstract: This study examines the economic potential of producing a wheat (Triticum aesitivum) and grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) rotation with three different tillage strategies compared to the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) in a semi-arid region. This research uses stochastic efficiency with respect to a function (SERF) to determine the preferred management strategies under various risk preferences and utility-weighted certainty equivalent risk premiums. Yields, input rates, and field operations from an experimental field in western Kansas are used to calculate net returns for each tillage strategy. Although current net returns to crop production using reduced tillage and no-tillage strategies are higher than CRP, risk analysis indicates CRP would be the preferred strategy for some risk-averse managers.
    Keywords: Conservation Reserve Program, conservation tillage, simulation, sorghum, wheat, risk, Agricultural and Food Policy, Crop Production/Industries, Farm Management, Land Economics/Use, Risk and Uncertainty,
    Date: 2009
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:saeana:45985&r=upt
  2. By: Antonella Tutino
    Abstract: This paper studies the implications of information-processing limits on the consumption and savings behavior of households through time. It presents a dynamic model in which consumers rationally choose the size and scope of the information they want to process concerning their financial possibilities, constrained by a Shannon channel. The model predicts that people with higher degrees of risk aversion rationally choose more information. This happens for precautionary reasons since, with finite processing rate, risk averse consumers prefer to be well informed about their financial possibilities before implementing a consumption plan. Moreover, numerical results show that consumers with processing capacity constraints have asymmetric responses to shocks, with negative shocks producing more persistent effects than positive ones. This asymmetry results in more savings. I show that the predictions of the model can be effectively used to study the impact of tax reforms on consumers spending.
    Date: 2008
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fip:fedgfe:2008-62&r=upt
  3. By: Natalia Karelaia; Robin Hogarth
    Abstract: In most naturally occurring situations, success depends on both skill and chance. We compare experimental market entry decisions where payoffs depend on skill alone and combinations of skill and luck. We find more risk taking with skill and luck as opposed to skill alone, particularly for males, and little overconfidence. Our data support an explanation based on differential attitudes toward luck by those whose self-assessed skills are low and high. Making luck more important induces greater optimism for the former, while the latter maintain a belief that high levels of skill are sufficient to overcome the vagaries of chance.
    Keywords: Skill, luck, overconfidence, optimism, competition, gender differences, risk taking
    JEL: C91 D81
    Date: 2008–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:upf:upfgen:1131&r=upt
  4. By: James C. Cox; Vjollca Sadiraj; Bodo Vogt
    Abstract: Expected value theory has been known for centuries to be subject to critique by St. Petersburg paradox arguments. And there is a traditional rebuttal of the critique that denies the empirical relevance of the paradox because of its apparent dependence on existence of credible offers to pay unbounded sums of money. Neither critique nor rebuttal focus on the question with empirical relevance: Do people make choices in bounded St. Petersburg games that are consistent with expected value theory? This paper reports an experiment that addresses that question.
    Keywords: St. Petersburg paradox, expected value theory, experiment
    Date: 2008–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:exc:wpaper:2008-05&r=upt

This nep-upt issue is ©2009 by Alexander Harin. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.