nep-tur New Economics Papers
on Tourism Economics
Issue of 2005‒09‒29
two papers chosen by
Roberto Zanola
Universita degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale

  1. Examining Changes in the Value of Rural Land in New Zealand between 1989 and 2003 By Steven Stillman
  2. Business Profitability and Social Profitability: Evaluating Industries with Externalities, The Case Casinos. By Earl L. Grinols; David B. Mustard

  1. By: Steven Stillman (Motu Economic & Public Policy Research)
    Abstract: This paper uses valuation data from Quotable Value New Zealand to examine changes in the value of the rural land in New Zealand between 1989 and 2003. The value of rural land reflects the profitability of agriculture as well as the returns to alternative land uses, and has a large impact on the prosperity of rural areas. The paper highlights the importance of both changes in land use and changes in the value of land in different uses in explaining overall changes in land values. It also examines the relationship among productive characteristics of the land, the local climate, various local amenities, and changes in land values and land use to better understand what factors have been driving overall changes in the value of rural land across New Zealand. We find that the real value of rural land in all uses increased substantially over the years being examined. Land use in rural areas also changed considerably during this period, but these changes in land use were essentially uncorrelated with changes in land values. Our regression results indicate that rural land values increased the most in less populated areas with good climates and local amenities. Initial land use also plays an important role in explaining the variation in changes in rural land values with greater increases in land values found in areas with more land initially devoted to urban uses and commercial forestry, and less land initially devoted to horticulture and lifestyle uses.
    Keywords: Land Use, Land Value, New Zealand, Rural Areas
    JEL: R14 R22 Q15
    Date: 2005–09–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wpa:wuwpur:0509015&r=tur
  2. By: Earl L. Grinols (University of Illinois); David B. Mustard (University of Georgia)
    Abstract: Casino gambling is a social issue, because in addition to the direct benefits to those who own and use casinos, positive and negative externalities are reaped and borne by those who do not gamble. To correctly assess the total economic impact of casinos, one must distinguish between business profitability and social profitability. This paper provides the most comprehensive framework for addressing the theoretical cost–benefit issues of casinos by grounding cost–benefit analysis on household utility. It also discusses the current state of knowledge about the estimates of both the positive and negative externalities generated by casinos. Lastly, it corrects many prevalent errors in the debate over the economics of casino gambling.
    Keywords: casino, crime, gambling, social costs, externality
    JEL: K
    Date: 2005–09–14
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wpa:wuwple:0509001&r=tur

This nep-tur issue is ©2005 by Roberto Zanola. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.