nep-tre New Economics Papers
on Transport Economics
Issue of 2012‒09‒09
five papers chosen by
Erik Teodoor Verhoef
VU University Amsterdam

  1. Tourists intra-destination visits and transportation mode : a bivariate model By Lorenzo Masiero; Judit Zoltan
  2. Transport Infrastructure for MED11 Countries By Robin Carruthers
  3. The impact of low emission zones on PM10 levels in urban areas in Germany By Malina, Christiane; Fischer, Frauke
  4. Some Theory, Some Ideology and Lots of Pragmatism in the Cost-Benefit Analysis of PPPs By Antonio Estache
  5. Removing poverty and inequality in India: the role of infrastructure By Majumder, Rajarshi

  1. By: Lorenzo Masiero (Institute for Economic Research (IRE), Faculty of Economics, University of Lugano, Switzerland); Judit Zoltan (Institute for Economic Research (IRE), Faculty of Economics, University of Lugano, Switzerland)
    Abstract: This paper investigates tourists' profile in relation to both intra-destination movement patterns and transportation mode choices at the destination through the use of bivariate probit models. The analysis is based on a field survey conducted among tourists visiting the Canton of Ticino, Switzerland. The results show a positive correlation between visiting more than one region and the use of private transportation at the destination. In particular, the two variables are explained by a mixed combination of independent variables; the transport mode choice of tourists can be well explained by demographics while destination movement patterns are rather influenced by trip characteristics. The introduction of activity participation and motivation increases consistently the fit of the model allowing a better understanding of tourist behaviour in relation to the spatial extent of the destination visited and to the transport mode selected. Finally, conclusions are drawn for policy implications in destination management and transport planning.
    Keywords: Intra-destination visits, Transportation mode, Tourist behaviour, Bivariate probit
    JEL: C25 L83
    Date: 2012–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:lug:wpaper:1205&r=tre
  2. By: Robin Carruthers
    Abstract: Lack of adequate infrastructure is a significant inhibitor to increased trade of the countries of the Mediterranean region. Bringing their transport infrastructure to standards comparable with countries of a similar per capita GDP will be costly but worthwhile. We compare the current quantities of six types of transport infrastructure with international, and estimate the additional quantities needed to reach the benchmarks. We also estimate the cost of that infrastructure and express it as a percentage of GDP. Finally we make tentative estimates of how much trade might be generated and how this might impact on GDP. All the estimates are made for each MED11 country and for each of four scenarios. The highest need for additional infrastructure will be for airport passenger terminals (between 52% and 56%), whereas the lowest need was for more unpaved roads (between 7% and 13%). The investment (including maintenance) cost would be between 0.9% of GDP and 2.4% of GDP, although the investments in some countries would be between 1.4% and 4.5% of GDP. The impact on non-oil international trade would be substantial, but with differences between imports and exports. The overall trade balance of the MED11 region would be an improvement of between 5.4% and 17.2%, although some countries would continue to have a negative balance. A final assessment was of the benefit ratio between the increase in GDP and the cost of transport investment. This varied between about 3 and 8, an indication of the high return to be expected from increased investment in transport infrastructure.
    Keywords: Infrastructure, Region, Investment, GDP, Trade, Benefit ratio
    JEL: F15 O18 O24 R42
    Date: 2012
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sec:cnrepo:0108&r=tre
  3. By: Malina, Christiane; Fischer, Frauke
    Abstract: High levels of particulate matter scaling less than 10 micrometers in diameter (PM10) in many urban areas have led to the introduction of binding PM10 limit values by the European Commission in 2005. Road transport in inner city areas is believed to be one of the main contributors to accumulated PM10 levels and, thus, is the focus of regulation. One of the strongest regulatory mechanisms to meet the new PM10 air quality standard is the introduction of low emission zones (LEZs) in Germany. This policy allows local authorities to define geographical areas in urban agglomerations as LEZs, into which vehicles that do not meet predetermined emission standards are prohibited from entering. This paper evaluates the effectiveness of LEZs on reducing PM10 levels in German cities. We employ a fixed effects panel data model to analyze the effects of LEZs on daily PM10 levels using data from 2000 to 2009. We take into account daily data for meteorological conditions and traffic volume. The results of the analysis reveal that the introduction of LEZs has significantly reduced daily PM10 levels in urban areas. We can also show that PM10 levels are significantly driven down further when LEZ standards in cities become more stringent over time. --
    Keywords: Particulate matter,low emission zones,panel data
    JEL: Q58 R49
    Date: 2012
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:cawmdp:58&r=tre
  4. By: Antonio Estache
    Abstract: This paper reviews the theoretical debates on the extent to which PPP demands changes in how cost-benefit analysis needs to be conducted for public projects. It presents first a simple conceptual discussion which shows that the comparison between PPP and public procurement boils down to: (i) the difference between the discount rate and the total cost difference between the best PPP bid and the best public sector option (including in the cost difference the allocation of operational risks and the likelihood of these risks). It then looks at international practice and shows that pragmatism, and sometimes ideology, dominates theory in the use of cost benefit analysis to compare the two forms of provision.
    Date: 2012–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/126487&r=tre
  5. By: Majumder, Rajarshi
    Abstract: Developing countries attach enormous importance to physical infrastructure for poverty reduction. We contend that this association is different across types of infrastructure and regions. The present paper explores the multidimensional association between infrastructure and poverty in India in a regional framework. Infrastructural availability improves average living standards and lowers the incidence of poverty but the relation between infrastructural situation and inequality indicates higher inequality in regions with better infrastructure, especially for rural areas. Various sub-components of infrastructure have different impacts on poverty reduction and policy formulations should focus on such differentiated roles while drawing up programmes.
    Keywords: Poverty; Infrastructure; Inequality; India; Regional Study; Asia;
    JEL: H54 D63 I32
    Date: 2012–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:40941&r=tre

This nep-tre issue is ©2012 by Erik Teodoor Verhoef. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.