nep-tid New Economics Papers
on Technology and Industrial Dynamics
Issue of 2012‒09‒22
two papers chosen by
Rui Baptista
Technical University of Lisbon

  1. R&D Determinants: accounting for the differences between research and development By Barge-Gil, Andrés; López, Alberto
  2. Competitive Effects of Merger Remedies in Europe's High-Tech Industry By Petar Angelov; Stephanie Rosenkranz; Hans Schenk

  1. By: Barge-Gil, Andrés; López, Alberto
    Abstract: The determinants of R&D are an important topic of industrial economics. The classical Schumpeterian hypotheses about the influence of size and market power have been complemented with the role played by industry determinants, such as demand pull, technological opportunity and appropriability, in determining R&D investments. However, R&D has always been considered as a whole, even though research and development are different activities with different purposes, knowledge bases, people involved and management styles. We take advantage of a new panel database of innovative Spanish firms (PITEC) to distinguish between research and development efforts of firms. We analyze the role jointly played by traditional R&D determinants in driving research and development, accounting for the differences between both activities. Results show that demand pull and appropriability have a higher effect on development, while technological opportunity is more influential for research. Differences are statistically significant, important in magnitude, and robust to the use of different indicators for demand pull, technological opportunity and appropriability and to several robustness checks.
    Keywords: R&D Determinants; Schumpeterian hypotheses; Demand pull; Technological opportunity; Appropriability
    JEL: O3
    Date: 2012–09–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:41270&r=tid
  2. By: Petar Angelov; Stephanie Rosenkranz; Hans Schenk
    Abstract: Using an event study methodology, this paper assesses the competitive effects of remedies implemented by the European Commission in 11 horizontal mergers in the ICT industry between 1990 and 2010. The estimates of merger announcement effects for both merging parties and competitors have predominantly insignificant residuals, suggesting that collusion and anti-competitive effects are not implied by the market reactions to merger announcements. Remedies, both behavioural and structural, appear to be largely ineffective in negating the competition concerns of the Commission, even if properly applied to anti-competitive mergers. Moreover, behavioural remedies appear to transfer rents from merging parties to competitors. These findings suggest that static economic models are ineffective in analysing dynamic markets, possibly as a result of inadequate market definitions.
    Keywords: Merger remedies; competition policy; industrial competitiveness; ICT; M&A; event study
    JEL: G34 L41 L43
    Date: 2012–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:use:tkiwps:1216&r=tid

This nep-tid issue is ©2012 by Rui Baptista. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.