nep-tid New Economics Papers
on Technology and Industrial Dynamics
Issue of 2011‒11‒01
two papers chosen by
Rui Baptista
Technical University of Lisbon

  1. Innovation Policy Design: Identification of Systemic Problems By Edquist, Charles
  2. Matthew effects and R&D subsidies: knowledge cumulability in high-tech and low-tech industries By Francesco Crespi; Cristiano Antonelli

  1. By: Edquist, Charles (CIRCLE, Lund University)
    Abstract: ‘Activities’ in innovation systems are the determinants of the development and diffusion of innovations. Examples are R&D, provision of organizations and institutions, financing of innovations, incubation, etc. These activities are partly performed by private organizations and partly by public organizations, the latter performing tasks that constitute innovation policy. As a basis for innovation policy, the problems (failures) in the systems must be identified. This paper focuses upon the design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis; it provides a framework for identification of systemic problems (or failures) in innovation systems.
    Keywords: Innovations systems; innovation policy
    JEL: O30
    Date: 2011–10–21
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:lucirc:2011_006&r=tid
  2. By: Francesco Crespi; Cristiano Antonelli
    Abstract: The paper explores the causes and effects of persistence in the discretionary allocation of public subsidies to R&D activities performed by private firms in high-tech and low-tech industries. It applies the distinction between virtuous Matthew-effects and vicious Matthew-effects. The former qualifies the persistence in the discretionary allocation of public subsidies in terms of sheer reputation based upon previous awards. The latter is identified by the role of the accumulation of competence stemming from past grants in current R&D activities. Virtuous Matthew effects are found in high-tech industries where knowledge cumulability is higher. In traditional industries, vicious Matthew effects prevail for the lower levels of knowledge cumulability. Here reputation-Matthew-effects can lead to substitution of private funds with public ones. The empirical analysis is based on Transition Probability Matrices, probit regressions and Propensity Score Matching on around 700 Italian firms in the years 1998-2003.
    Keywords: Innovation; R&D subsidies; Matthew effects; past dependence; path dependence
    JEL: H25 H32 L52
    Date: 2011–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:rtr:wpaper:140&r=tid

This nep-tid issue is ©2011 by Rui Baptista. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.