nep-tid New Economics Papers
on Technology and Industrial Dynamics
Issue of 2011‒03‒19
four papers chosen by
Rui Baptista
Technical University of Lisbon

  1. Creative Destruction and Productive Preemption By Norbäck, Pehr-Johan; Persson, Lars; Svensson, Roger
  2. Strategic Investment and the Gains from Trade By Gerda Dewit; Dermot Leahy
  3. Evaluating the impact of innovation incentives: evidence from an unexpected shortage of funds By Guido de Blasio; Davide Fantino; Guido Pellegrini
  4. Competitive Pressure and the Adoption of Complementary Innovations By Kretschmer, Tobias; Miravete, Eugenio J; Pernías, Jose C

  1. By: Norbäck, Pehr-Johan; Persson, Lars; Svensson, Roger
    Abstract: We develop a theory of innovation for entry and sale into oligopoly, and show that an invention of higher quality is more likely to be sold (or licensed) to an incumbent due to strategic product market effects on the sales price. Preemptive acquisitions by incumbents are shown to stimulate the process of creative destruction by increasing the entrepreneurial effort allocated to high-quality invention projects. Using data on patents granted to small firms and individuals, we find evidence that high-quality inventions are sold under bidding competition. Asymmetric information problems are shown to be solved by verification through entry for sale.
    Keywords: Acquisitions; Entrepreneurship; Innovation; Ownership; Patent; Start-ups
    JEL: G24 L1 L2 M13 O3
    Date: 2011–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:8281&r=tid
  2. By: Gerda Dewit (Department of Economics Finance and Accounting, National University of Ireland, Maynooth); Dermot Leahy (Department of Economics Finance and Accounting, National University of Ireland, Maynooth)
    Abstract: This paper examines how trade liberalisation affects innovation, profits and welfare when firms are engaging in strategic R&D investment. We show that there are multiple equilibria including an autarky equilibrium for a range of high but non-prohibitive trade costs. At lower trade costs, only the trading equilibrium survives. Welfare is U-shaped in the trade costs, so a small fall in trade costs can be welfare reducing. However we find a threshold level of the effectiveness of investment above which trade is always welfare superior to autarky
    Keywords: Reciprocal Markets, Strategic R&D Investment, Trade Costs, Trade Liberalisation, Effectiveness of R&D.
    JEL: F12 F13 F15 L13
    Date: 2011
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:may:mayecw:n216-11.pdf&r=tid
  3. By: Guido de Blasio (Bank of Italy); Davide Fantino (Bank of Italy); Guido Pellegrini (Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza")
    Abstract: To evaluate the effect of an R&D subsidy one needs to know what the subsidized firms would have done without the incentive. This paper studies an Italian programme of subsidies for the applied development of innovations, exploiting a discontinuity in programme financing due to an unexpected shortage of public money. To identify the effect of the programme, the study implements a regression discontinuity design and compares firms that applied for funding before and after the shortage occurred. The results indicate that the programme was not effective in stimulating innovative investment.
    Keywords: R&D, public policy, evaluation
    JEL: O32 O38
    Date: 2011–02
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bdi:wptemi:td_792_11&r=tid
  4. By: Kretschmer, Tobias; Miravete, Eugenio J; Pernías, Jose C
    Abstract: Liberalization of the European automobile distribution system in 2002 limits the ability of manufacturers to impose vertical restraints, leading to a substantial increase in competitive pressure among dealers. We estimate an equilibrium model of profit maximization to evaluate how dealers change their innovation adoption strategies following the elimination of exclusive territories. Using French data we evaluate the existence of complementarities between the adoption of software applications and the scale of production. Firms view these innovations as substitutes and concentrate their effort in one type of software as they expand their scale of production. Results are robust to the existence of unobserved heterogeneity.
    Keywords: Competitive Pressure; Complementarity; Product and Process Innovation
    JEL: C35 L86 O31
    Date: 2011–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:8289&r=tid

This nep-tid issue is ©2011 by Rui Baptista. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.