nep-tid New Economics Papers
on Technology and Industrial Dynamics
Issue of 2009‒11‒14
three papers chosen by
Rui Baptista
Technical University of Lisbon

  1. Contextual effects on the complementarities between R&D activities: An empirical analysis of the Korean manufacturing industry By Sungki Lee; Donghyuk Choi; Yeonbae Kim
  2. Does partner type matter in R&D collaboration for product innovation? By Ki H. Kang; Jina Kang
  3. FDI, R&D and Innovation Output in the Chinese Automobile Industry By Chen, Fang; Mohnen, Pierre

  1. By: Sungki Lee; Donghyuk Choi; Yeonbae Kim (Technology Management, Economics and Policy Program(TEMEP), Seoul National University)
    Abstract: Firms undertake various R&D activities to generate commercializable innovations and to create and sustain competitive advantage. However, mere exploitation of various R&D opportunities has no conclusive impacts on a firm¡¯s competitive advantage in innovation, since R&D activities might closely interact with each other and their appropriate combination would have a synergy effect on a firm¡¯s innovation performance. The aim of this paper is to explore various contextual factors behind synergy effects derived from interactions between R&D activities based on the economic and technological sources of the R&D complementarities, such as absorptive capacity, knowledge flows, and uncertainty, as well as to examine the existence of complementarities between corporate R&D activities, using the 2004 innovation survey data of Korean manufacturing industries. The corporate R&D activities considered in this study are in-house R&D, R&D cooperation, and commissioned R&D. Our research concludes that there exists a complementary relationship between a firm¡¯s internal R&D and R&D cooperation activity. In addition, our study discovered that the complementarity between R&D activities relies on the organizational contextualities?a firm¡¯s cumulative patent stocks, perceived level of imitation risk, experience of external knowledge acquisition, and information inflows from public research institutes and universities?that lie hidden under the firm-specific activities.
    Keywords: Contextuality, Complementarity, Innovation, In-house R&D, R&D cooperation, Commissioned R&D
    Date: 2009–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:snv:dp2009:200917&r=tid
  2. By: Ki H. Kang; Jina Kang (Technology Management, Economics and Policy Program(TEMEP), Seoul National University)
    Abstract: Recent research identify the type of partner as a critical factor determining the effect of R&D collaboration on innovation. Most firms tend to utilize various types of R&D collaboration partners simultaneously, and partnerships between different types of partners show different properties. Thus, the effect of R&D collaboration may vary depending on partner types. This study considers four partner types: competitors, customers, suppliers, and universities. It empirically examines the effect of R&D collaboration with each type of partner on product innovation,employing the Korea Innovation Survey data. Results show that R&D collaborations with customers and universities have a positive effect on product innovation, whereas R&D collaborations with suppliers and competitors have an inverted-U shape relationship with product innovation.
    Keywords: R&D collaboration, product innovation, competitors, customers, suppliers, universities
    Date: 2009–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:snv:dp2009:200906&r=tid
  3. By: Chen, Fang (Chinese Academy of Sciences); Mohnen, Pierre (UNU-MERIT, Maastricht University, and CIRANO)
    Abstract: After joining the World Trade Organization (WTO), China witnessed a major inflow of Foreign Direct Investment (FDI). Many famous automobile firms of developed countries were attracted to invest in China to cooperate with domestic firms. This paper uses firm-level data of the Chinese automobile industry to analyze the determinants of, and the interrelationships between, innovation input and innovation output, and in particular whether FDI had any influence on these two aspects of innovation. A generalized tobit model will be estimated for both R&D and the share of innovative sales for 2002/2003 and 2005/2006. The findings show that FDI firms are less R&D intensive but, when they innovate in new products, they are more product innovative than domestic-funded firms.
    Keywords: FDI, China, R&D, innovation, automobile industry
    JEL: O14 L62 F21
    Date: 2009
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:unumer:2009044&r=tid

This nep-tid issue is ©2009 by Rui Baptista. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.