nep-tid New Economics Papers
on Technology and Industrial Dynamics
Issue of 2008‒05‒10
two papers chosen by
Rui Baptista
Technical University of Lisbon

  1. The Dynamics of Firm Growth - a re-examination By Lööf, Hans
  2. Productivity Growth, Knowledge Flows, and Spillovers By Gustavo Crespi; Chiara Criscuolo; Jonathan E. Haskel; Matthew Slaughter

  1. By: Lööf, Hans (CESIS - Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, Royal Institute of Technology)
    Abstract: This article provides evidence that shed further light on the dynamic relationships between finance, physical investment, R&D, productivity and profit. Estimating relationships for 5,289 observations on Swedish manufacturing firms with 50 or more employees over the 1992-2000 periods, the following substantial empirical findings emerge. First, physical investments are sensitive to both internal financing (profit) and external financing (expressed as leverage, or the ratio of debt over equity and debt) while R&D is only weakly affected by the firm’s finance conditions. Second, no robust correlation between knowledge investments and ordinary investments can be established. Third, R&D has a strong effect on productivity and profit. The reverse relationship is fragile and typically insignificant. The causality between physical capital and productivity is bidirectional, while increased profit leads to more capital but not the vice versa.
    Keywords: Financial constraints; R&D; Investments; Productivity; Panel data
    JEL: O31 O32
    Date: 2008–04–28
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:cesisp:0128&r=tid
  2. By: Gustavo Crespi; Chiara Criscuolo; Jonathan E. Haskel; Matthew Slaughter
    Abstract: This paper explores the role of knowledge flows and productivity growth by linking direct survey data on knowledge flows to firm-level data on TFP growth. Our data measure the information flows often considered important, especially by policy-makers, such as from within the firm and from suppliers, customers, and competitors. We examine (a) what are the empirically important sources of knowledge flows? (b) to what extent do such flows contribute to TFP growth? (c) do such flows constitute a spillover of free knowledge? (d) how do such flows correspond to suggested spillover sources, such as multinational or R&D presence? We find that: (a) the main sources of knowledge are competitors; suppliers; and plants that belong to the same business group ; (b) these three flows together account for about 50% of TFP growth; (c) the main "free" information flow spillover is from competitors; and (d) multinational presence contributes to this spillover.
    JEL: F23 O47 O57
    Date: 2008–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:13959&r=tid

This nep-tid issue is ©2008 by Rui Baptista. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.