nep-tid New Economics Papers
on Technology and Industrial Dynamics
Issue of 2006‒09‒23
five papers chosen by
Roberto Fontana
Universita Bocconi

  1. Creative Destruction in Industries By Boyan Jovanovic; Chung-Yi Tse
  2. Public & Private Spillovers, Location and the Productivity of Pharmaceutical Research By Jeffrey L. Furman; Magaret K. Kyle; Iain M. Cockburn; Rebecca Henderson
  3. Innovation Capabilities: The Knowledge Capital Behind the Survival and Growth of Firms By Baldwin, John R.; Gellatly, Guy
  4. Entrepreneurship in biotechnology: The case of four start-ups in the Upper-Rhine Biovalley. By Antoine Bureth; Julien Pénin; Sandrine Wolff
  5. Variety of technological trajectories in low emission vehicles (LEVs): a patent data analysis By Vanessa OLTRA (E3i-IFReDE-GRES); Maïder SAINT-JEAN (E3i-IFReDE-GRES)

  1. By: Boyan Jovanovic; Chung-Yi Tse
    Abstract: Most industries go through a "shakeout" phase during which the number of producers in the industry declines. Industry output generally continues to rise, however, which implies a reallocation of capacity from exiting firms to incumbents and new entrants. Thus shakeouts seem to be classic creative destruction episodes. Shakeouts of firms tend to occur sooner in industries where technological progress is rapid. Existing models do not explain this. Yet the relation emerges naturally in a vintage-capital model in which shakeouts of firms accompany the replacement of capital, and in which a shakeout is the first replacement echo of the capital created when the industry is born. We fit the model to the Gort-Klepper data and to Agarwal's update of those data.
    JEL: L11
    Date: 2006–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:12520&r=tid
  2. By: Jeffrey L. Furman; Magaret K. Kyle; Iain M. Cockburn; Rebecca Henderson
    Abstract: While there is widespread agreement among economists and management scholars that knowledge spillovers exist and have important economic consequences, researchers know substantially less about the "micro mechanisms" of spillovers -- about the degree to which they are geographically localized, for example, or about the degree to which spillovers from public institutions are qualitatively different from those from privately owned firms (Jaffe, 1986; Krugman, 1991; Jaffe et al., 1993; Porter, 1990). In this paper we make use of the geographic distribution of the research activities of major global pharmaceutical firms to explore the extent to which knowledge spills over from proximate private and public institutions. Our data and empirical approach allow us to make advances on two dimensions. First, by focusing on spillovers in research productivity (as opposed to manufacturing productivity), we build closely on the theoretical literature on spillovers that suggests that knowledge externalities are likely to have the most immediate impact on the production of ideas (Romer, 1986; Aghion & Howitt, 1997). Second, our data allow us to distinguish spillovers from public research from spillovers from private, or competitively funded research, and to more deeply explore the role that institutions and geographic proximity play in driving knowledge spillovers.
    JEL: L23 L65 O3 R3
    Date: 2006–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:12509&r=tid
  3. By: Baldwin, John R.; Gellatly, Guy
    Abstract: This paper summarizes the findings of a research program aimed at outlining the importance to the firm growth process of competencies that arise from investments in intangible assets. The program has consisted of two parts. First, longitudinal databases have provided a rich set of studies on entry, exit, mergers and other aspects of dynamics related to growth and decline in firm populations. These studies have shown the pervasiveness of growth and decline in the firm population. By themselves, these studies do not demonstrate what strategies differentiate the most successful from the least successful. To do so, we have built a set of firm surveys that allowed profiles to be developed of the type of competencies that stem from investments in organizational capital. In turn, these are linked to administrative data that allow us to classify firms as either growing or declining. We then asked how differences in competencies were related to the performance of firms.
    Date: 2006–09–18
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:stc:stcp1e:2006013e&r=tid
  4. By: Antoine Bureth; Julien Pénin; Sandrine Wolff
    Abstract: This paper explores entrepreneurship in biotech through the in depth analysis of four new ventures located in the Upper-Rhine Biovalley. One of the strengths of this paper is the presence of both successful cases of entrepreneurship and of cases of failures. This gives the opportunity to discuss the role of several factors on the performance of a new biotech venture. Three points particularly comes out of this study: The importance of public science, without which new biotech firms could hardly exist; the role of the patent system, the importance of which we link to the business model adopted by the firm; and the importance of collaborations, which we study through the concept of distributed entrepreneurship.
    Keywords: Intellectual property rights, patents, science, distributed entrepreneurship, collective invention.
    JEL: D2 O3
    Date: 2006
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ulp:sbbeta:2006-21&r=tid
  5. By: Vanessa OLTRA (E3i-IFReDE-GRES); Maïder SAINT-JEAN (E3i-IFReDE-GRES)
    Abstract: This paper focuses on the diversity of engine technologies for Low Emission Vehicles (LEVs) that are developed by car manufacturers in order to substitute for the conventional internal combustion engine vehicle. Our purpose is to analyse the competition between the various technologies for LEVs as well as the innovative strategy of car manufacturers. We first propose to define and to represent these technological trajectories in order to compare their performances and to identify their strength and weaknesses. The technological bottlenecks, the barriers to the adoption of these alternative engine technologies as well as the features of this technological competition are underlined. We then use a patent data analysis to study the patent portfolios of the main car manufacturers in these technologies on the period from 1990 to 2005. The dynamics of patents applied by car manufacturers gives insight on the competition among technologies and on the strategy of firms. This analysis emphasises the progressive diversification of firms patent portfolios over the whole set of engine technologies and the differentiated strategic positioning of car manufacturers according to countries.
    Keywords: Low emission vehicles; environmental innovation; technological competition; patent data
    JEL: O33 Q55 L62
    Date: 2006
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:grs:wpegrs:2006-20&r=tid

This nep-tid issue is ©2006 by Roberto Fontana. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.