|
on Technology and Industrial Dynamics |
By: | Flora Bellone (Observatoire Français des Conjonctures Économiques); Patrick Musso (Observatoire Français des Conjonctures Économiques); Lionel Nesta (Observatoire Français des Conjonctures Économiques); Michel Quéré (Observatoire Français des Conjonctures Économiques) |
Date: | 2006 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fce:doctra:0604&r=tid |
By: | Gustavo Crespi (University of Sussex, AIM and CeRiBA); Chiara Criscuolo (CEP, LSE, AIM and CeRiBA); Jonathan Haskel (Queen Mary, University of London) |
Abstract: | Case study evidence suggests that exporting firms learn from their clients. But econometric evidence, mostly using exporting and TFP growth, is mixed. We use a UK panel data set with firm-level information on exporting and productivity. Our innovation is that we also have direct data on the sources of learning (in this case about new technologies). Controlling for fixed effects we have two main findings. First, we find firms who exported in the past are more likely to then report that they learnt from buyers (relative to learning from other sources). Second, firms who had learned from buyers (more than they learnt from other sources) in the past are more likely to then have productivity growth. This suggests some support for the learning-by-exporting hypothesis, though is not clear whether firms deserve an exporting subsidy. |
Keywords: | Productivity, Exporting, Learning |
JEL: | F12 L1 |
Date: | 2006–04 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:wp559&r=tid |
By: | David B. Audretsch; Taylor Aldridge; Alexander Oettl |
Date: | 2006–01 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:esi:egpdis:2006-11&r=tid |
By: | Avenel, E.; Corolleur, F.; Gauthier, C.; Rieu, C. |
Abstract: | Based on an original dataset, we analyze empirically the determinants of firm growth in the French biotech industry during two periods, 1996-1999 and 1999-2002. We have two main results. First, Gibrat's law is violated. The growth of annual turnover is influenced by teh initial size of the firm. The effect is non-linear, negative for small firms. Second, location has a significant impact on growth. We use different sets of dummies to characterize location and different measures of firm growth. As a whole, our results point at Marseilles (and its region) and Nanterre (but not Paris and Evry) as favorable places for the growth of firms between 1999 and 2002. For the 1996-1999, the favorable places are Strasbourg (and Alsace) and Rh“ne-Alpes (Lyon/Grenoble). Our analysis thus suggests that the changes in the (notably legal) environment of French biotech firms that took place in 1999 had a drastic effect of the comparative advantages of locations for biotech firms. |
Keywords: | BIOTECHNOLOGY; INDUSTRIAL CLUSTERING; FIRM GROWTH; FRANCE |
JEL: | L25 L65 R30 |
Date: | 2005 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:gbl:wpaper:200503&r=tid |
By: | Philippe Gagnepain (Universidad Carlos III de Madrid); Pedro Pereira (Autoridade da Concorrência) |
Keywords: | Mobile Telephony, Entry, Competition, Efficiency, Empirical Analysis |
JEL: | L13 L43 L93 |
Date: | 2005–02 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pca:wpaper:05&r=tid |
By: | Heli Koski; Tobias Kretschmer |
Keywords: | Product innovation, mobile phone handsets, dominant design, min-max principle |
JEL: | L15 L96 O32 |
Date: | 2006–04–03 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:rif:dpaper:1012&r=tid |
By: | Avenel, E.; Favier, A.V.; Ma, S.; Mangematin V.; Rieu, C. |
Abstract: | The paper investigates the linkages between characteristics of technologies and a firm’s knowledge base. Nanotechnologies have been defined as converging technologies that operate as nanoscale, and which require integration to fulfil their economic promises. The paper analyses the degree of convergence and the convergence mechanisms within a firm’s knowledge base. If convergence predominates as it has been claimed, nanotechnologies are not competence destroyers and the development is based on the exetension of the knowledge base of existing firms. Based on a worldwide database of nanofirms, the paper examines the influence of the characteristics of the technologies on the structure of the firm knowledge base. It argues that nano S&T patterns of development combine competence destroying activities and a critical role of research facilities and technological platforms. While the competence destroying characteristics of nanotechnologies give a premium to emerging companies, the role of research and production facilities stenghthens large incumbent competitive position and geographically polarises the emergence of small dedicated nanofimrs. |
Keywords: | FIRM KNOWLEDGE BASE ; NANOTECHNOLOGY; COHERENCE SCOPE; SCIENCE REGIME; CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES |
JEL: | O31 O32 L22 |
Date: | 2006 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:gbl:wpaper:200602&r=tid |
By: | Yong-Hwan Noh; GianCarlo Moschini (Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD)) |
Abstract: | We analyze the entry of a new product into a vertically differentiated market in which an entrant and an incumbent compete in prices. Here the entry-deterrence strategies of the incumbent firm rely on "limit qualities." With a sequential choice of quality, a quality-dependent marginal production cost, and a fixed entry cost, we relate the entry-quality decision and the entry-deterrence strategies to the level of entry cost and the degree of consumer heterogeneity. Quality-dependent marginal production costs in the model entail the possibility of inferior-quality entry as well as an incumbent's aggressive entry-deterrence strategies of increasing its quality level toward potential entry. Welfare evaluation confirms that social welfare is not necessarily improved when entry is encouraged rather than deterred. |
Keywords: | entry deterrence; quality choice; vertical product differentiation. |
JEL: | C72 D43 L13 |
Date: | 2005–09 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ias:cpaper:05-wp403&r=tid |
By: | Laura Abramovsky (Institute for Fiscal Studies); Elisabeth Kremp; Alberto López; Tobias Schmidt; Helen Simpson (Institute for Fiscal Studies) |
Abstract: | This paper investigates co-operative research activity by firms using data from the 3rd Community Innovation Survey for four countries, France, Germany, Spain and the UK. We build on the Cassiman and Veugelers (CV) (2002) study of Belgian manufacturing firms, by incorporating information on the service sector, and considering the role of public support in affecting firms’ decisions to co-operate. Our results support those in CV, in that we find a positive relationship between the likelihood of undertaking co-operative R&D and both incoming knowledge spillovers and the extent to which firms find strategic methods important in appropriating the returns to innovative activity. We find that public support is positively related to the probability of undertaking co-operative agreements particularly with regard to the likelihood of co-operation with the research base. We find some evidence, in particular for Spain, that firms carry out co-operative R&D to overcome excessive perceived risks and financial constraints. |
Keywords: | R&D co-operation, spillovers, joint ventures, CIS |
JEL: | O31 O32 L24 |
Date: | 2005–10 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:05/23&r=tid |
By: | Kazuyuki Motohashi |
Abstract: | In this paper, IP strategy at firm level is analyzed in a framework of use of patent as a tool for maximizing firm's revenue, based on a dataset from JPO's Survey of Intellectual Property Activities in 2004. Descriptive regressions of IP strategy indicators suggest a non-linear relationship between firm size and licensing propensity. For a small firm with less complementary assets, such as production facility and marketing channels, tends to license more. At the same time, a licensing propensity of large firm is also high due to the effect of cross licensing. |
Date: | 2006–04 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:eti:dpaper:06021&r=tid |