nep-spo New Economics Papers
on Sports and Economics
Issue of 2024‒02‒26
three papers chosen by
Humberto Barreto, DePauw University


  1. Identity and Economic Incentives By Kwabena Donkor; Lorenz Goette; Maximilian W. Müller; Eugen Dimant; Michael Kurschilgen
  2. The French Sport Observatory: analysing and evaluating national and territorial policies By Arnaud Saurois; Bastien Viollet
  3. Interpersonal Preferences and Team Performance: The Role of Liking in Complex Problem Solving By Timm Opitz

  1. By: Kwabena Donkor; Lorenz Goette; Maximilian W. Müller; Eugen Dimant; Michael Kurschilgen
    Abstract: This paper examines how beliefs and preferences drive identity-conforming consumption or investments. We introduce a theory that explains how identity distorts individuals’ beliefs about potential outcomes and imposes psychic costs on benefiting from identity-incongruent sources. We substantiate our theoretical foundation through two lab-infield experiments on soccer betting in Kenya and the UK, where participants either had established affiliations with the teams involved or assumed a neutral stance. The results indicate that soccer fans have overoptimistic beliefs about match outcomes that align with their identity and bet significantly higher amounts on those than on outcomes of comparable games where they are neutral. After accounting for individuals’ beliefs and risk preferences, our structural estimates reveal that participants undervalue gains from identity-incongruent assets by 9% to 27%. Our counterfactual simulations imply that identity-specific beliefs account for 30% to 44% of the investment differences between neutral observers and supporters, with the remainder being due to identity preferences.
    Keywords: identity, investments, beliefs
    JEL: D91 G41 Z10
    Date: 2023
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10860&r=spo
  2. By: Arnaud Saurois (MOVE - Laboratoire "Mobilité, Vieillissement, Exercice" - Université de Poitiers); Bastien Viollet (CEREGE - Centre de recherche en gestion - IAE Poitiers - Institut d'Administration des Entreprises (IAE) - Poitiers - Université de Poitiers - Université de Poitiers - ULR - La Rochelle Université - Excelia Group | La Rochelle Business School)
    Abstract: L'Observatoire du Sport Français de l'Université de Poitiers a été créé 2014 afin d'objectiver la prise de décisions des politiques sportives à partir de l'exploitation de données qui apparaissaient sous estimées. Par exemple, il s'agit de croiser des données du sport fédéral (ex. : nombre de licences, de clubs, de sportifs de haut niveau) et socio-économiques (ex. : revenus médians par territoire) pour mettent mettre en exergue des éléments d'analyse. Cette sous-exploitation provient souvent d'un manque d'un manque de connaissance de l'existant mais aussi d'un déficit de moyens et/ou d'expertise pour faire émerger ces données, être en mesure de les faire comprendre et de les analyser. L'ambition de cet Observatoire est ainsi d'accompagner à la mise en place des politiques sportives (formalisation, évaluation) à travers l'analyse des dynamiques territoriales et fédérales. La mobilisation d'outils de « datavisualisation » rend possible l'émergence d'un diagnostic partagé entre les différents acteurs du sport français, une étape nécessaire avant d'envisager de faire évoluer les orientations territoriales et/ou fédérales
    Keywords: observatoire, sport fédéré, data, politiques sportives
    Date: 2022–12–23
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03942336&r=spo
  3. By: Timm Opitz (MPI-IC)
    Abstract: Organizations increasingly rely on teams to solve complex problems. The ability of teams to work well together is critical to their success. I experimentally test whether team performance is affected by whether team members like each other. I find that teams in which partners like each other do not outperform teams in which partners dislike each other. However, teams in which one partner likes the other more than the other perform best. The performance differences result directly from changes in collaborative behavior when learning the team partner's interpersonal preferences, not indirectly from interacting with different individuals. Participants do not anticipate this pattern and expect to be most successful in a team where partners like each other. This provides insights into how teams should be optimally composed, when self-selection may be detrimental to performance, and what information about others' interpersonal preferences should be revealed.
    Keywords: interpersonal preferences; teamwork; liking; complex problem solving; non-routine tasks;
    JEL: C92 D23 D83 D91
    Date: 2024–02–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:rco:dpaper:492&r=spo

This nep-spo issue is ©2024 by Humberto Barreto. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.