| Abstract: |
This paper examines whether the Bosman ruling plays an important role in the
market for native soccer players. Through the abolition of transfer fees after
the expiration of contracts, as well as the liberalization of the migration of
professional soccer players within the European Union, the Bosman ruling could
negatively impact the number of national players participating in their
national leagues. To explore this issue, we use data on the First Division of
the Spanish League for the seasons 1980/1981 to 2011/2012. Results point to a
decline in the number of native Spanish players after the Bosman ruling,
although the impact does not appear to be permanent. This finding is
consistent with the use of different subsamples, and to the introduction of
controls for unobserved characteristics varying at the team level or over
time, and to observed characteristics such as GDP per capita, population, the
age of players, and potential TV revenues. This work also explores the impact
of other, similar legislative changes, such as the Kolpak case and the Cotonou
agreement, which appeared in the post-Bosman period. In addition, we
incorporate empirical evidence of the potential impact that the Bosman ruling
may have on the performance of the Spanish players. Our findings indicate that
the Bosman case has had a negative impact on the number of minutes played and
on the participation of national players in the first team, suggesting that an
average Spanish player is less important to his team. |