| Abstract: |
We study the effects of completing the legal framework of matchmakers with a
rule designating which party must pay the commission. The paper examines the
two rules currently open to debate at the international level in sport: the
"player-pays" principle and the "club-pays" principle. We find that the most
appropriate measure entails designating the party with the lesser bargaining
power to pay the intermediary’s fee. However, our main result indicates that
the appropriateness of imposing an additional rule in the legal framework is a
preliminary issue. Indeed, even if the best rule is chosen, welfare may be
decreased by this legal initiative. |