nep-sog New Economics Papers
on Sociology of Economics
Issue of 2024‒07‒22
three papers chosen by
Jonas Holmström, Axventure AB


  1. Promoting Reproducibility and Replicability in Political Science By Brodeur, Abel; Esterling, Kevin; Ankel-Peters, Jörg; Bueno, Natália S; Desposato, Scott; Dreber, Anna; Genovese, Federica; Green, Donald P; Hepplewhite, Matthew; de la Guardia, Fernando Hoces; Johannesson, Magnus; Kotsadam, Andreas; Miguel, Edward; Velez, Yamil R; Young, Lauren
  2. Replication games: how to make reproducibility research more systematic By Brodeur, Abel; Dreber, Anna; Hoces de la Guardia, Fernando; Miguel, Edward
  3. Do Female Experts Face an Authority Gap? Evidence from Economics By Sievertsen, Hans Henrik; Smith, Sarah

  1. By: Brodeur, Abel; Esterling, Kevin; Ankel-Peters, Jörg; Bueno, Natália S; Desposato, Scott; Dreber, Anna; Genovese, Federica; Green, Donald P; Hepplewhite, Matthew; de la Guardia, Fernando Hoces; Johannesson, Magnus; Kotsadam, Andreas; Miguel, Edward; Velez, Yamil R; Young, Lauren
    Abstract: This article reviews and summarizes current reproduction and replication practices in political science. We first provide definitions for reproducibility and replicability. We then review data availability policies for 28 leading political science journals and present the results from a survey of editors about their willingness to publish comments and replications. We discuss new initiatives that seek to promote and generate high-quality reproductions and replications. Finally, we make the case for standards and practices that may help increase data availability, reproducibility, and replicability in political science.
    Keywords: Political Science, Human Society, Reproducibility, replicability, political science, Political science
    Date: 2024–01–01
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt23n3n3dg&r=
  2. By: Brodeur, Abel; Dreber, Anna; Hoces de la Guardia, Fernando; Miguel, Edward
    Keywords: Economics, Applied Economics, Psychology, Reproducibility of Results, Research, Research Design, Research data, Research management, Scientific community, Sociology, General Science & Technology
    Date: 2023–09–28
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cdl:econwp:qt1qj8937s&r=
  3. By: Sievertsen, Hans Henrik (University of Bristol); Smith, Sarah (University of Bristol)
    Abstract: This paper reports results from a survey experiment comparing the effect of (the same) opinions expressed by male versus female experts. Members of the public were asked for their opinions on topical issues and shown the opinion of either a male or a female economist, all professors at leading US universities. We find, first, that experts can persuade members of the public - the opinions of individual expert economists have an effect on public opinion - and, second, that the opinions expressed by female economists are more persuasive than the same opinions expressed by male economists.
    Keywords: economic expertise, persuasion, gender, stereotypes, survey experiments
    JEL: A11 D83 J16
    Date: 2024–05
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17029&r=

This nep-sog issue is ©2024 by Jonas Holmström. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.