nep-sog New Economics Papers
on Sociology of Economics
Issue of 2025–12–08
two papers chosen by
Jonas Holmström, Axventure AB


  1. Preregistrations without Code do not Prevent P-Hacking By Röseler, Lukas
  2. Exploration in Research Teams: Building on the Shoulders of PhD Students By Raffaele Miniaci; Michele Pezzoni; Sotaro Shibayama

  1. By: Röseler, Lukas (University of Münster)
    Abstract: Preregistrations have been suggested as a tool to prevent p-hacking. Most researchers have used semi-structured preregistration templates to deprive themselves of researchers’ degrees of freedom. I show how such “narrative preregistrations” do not fully prevent p-hacking for even very simple statistical techniques (e.g., correlations) unless the analysis code is part of the preregistration.
    Date: 2025–11–21
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:osf:metaar:v259t_v1
  2. By: Raffaele Miniaci (University of Brescia, Italy); Michele Pezzoni (Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, GREDEG, France; Observatoire des Sciences et Techniques, HCERES, Paris, France); Sotaro Shibayama (The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan)
    Abstract: Exploration is a critical input for creativity and innovation. This paper aims to investigate how the innovator and her team's exploration activities boost the innovator's performance. In our empirical context, the innovator is a French professor at the university, and her team consists of her PhD students. We study 14, 978 research teams, led by an equivalent number of supervisors. Supervisors and students can explore by investigating research subjects that the supervisor has not previously investigated. Moreover, the direction of their exploration can be more or less aligned. We measure exploration by assessing the similarity of students' and supervisors' research documents using text analysis. Our regression analyses find that both supervisors' and students' exploration activities play a role in determining the supervisors' performance, as measured by publication quantity, impact, and novelty. We show that an optimal combination of exploration activities and alignment yields considerably higher supervisor performance compared to the average. Our results support the idea that PhD students' exploration activities are of paramount importance to their supervisors' performance, and that supervisors should pay close attention when assigning students' thesis subjects.
    Keywords: Research teams; Student exploration; Supervisor exploration; Scientific performance; Text analysis algorithm; Science of science
    JEL: I20 O30
    Date: 2025–12
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:gre:wpaper:2025-49

This nep-sog issue is ©2025 by Jonas Holmström. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the Griffith Business School of Griffith University in Australia.