By: |
Paula Pereda;
Matsunaga, Diaz, Borges, Chalco, Rocha, Narita, Brenck |
Abstract: |
Female underrepresentation in high-profile career positions has relevant
impacts on firms' outcomes and public policies. In the academic profession,
women's participation decreases as they evolve in their career. To understand
the lack of women in the field of economics in Brazil, we investigate the
decision to submit papers to the largest conference in the country (Brazilian
Meeting of Economics), as an important achievement in the profession. We
explore a novel panel dataset of researchers and match them with web-scraped
data of their résumés to test gender differences in the probability of
submitting an article one year after having an article (same or new) rejected
in the previous year. Our findings suggest that women desist 5.9 percentage
points more than men when facing rejection. We also find evidence that younger
women give up more and that the quality of the undergraduate program matters
to determine the difference in the desistance rate between men and women. We
argue that higher quality institutions might self-select women who are more
competitive. |
Keywords: |
Female underrepresentation; competitive behavior; academic conferences |
JEL: |
J15 J16 C23 A11 |
Date: |
2020–09–29 |
URL: |
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:spa:wpaper:2020wpecon19&r=all |