| Abstract: |
We are currently in times in which an increased discussion on
interdisciplinarity is on the agenda. Economics tends to go into directions of
sociology, history, and psychology, taking on topics of their domains.
Questions of convergencies and divergencies between the academic subjects are
a result. This observation goes parallel with sociological debate on the
status of sociology. Major questions remaining are: (1.) Has the field of
sociology changed since Emilé Durkheim or Max Weber? (2.) Which domain can
sociology claim as being its exclusive ground? Answers to these questions have
to identify a broader landscape of academic division: Economics is moving
increasingly in the direction of social topics and sociological ground. The
“imperialism of economics” (Granovetter) is increasingly approaching
traditional academic fields of history, psychology, and sociology. However, at
least two psychologists (H. Simon, D. Kahneman) and an economic historian (R.
Fogel) have received Nobel prizes in economics. How can sociology map with
this trend, how can this challenge be converted into an academic opportunity?
The paper will explore observed trends in detail in order to conclude that the
public image of sociology may have declined during recent decades, but the
strategic use and importance of (economic) sociology has never been greater.
Economic sociology seems to have become an upgraded discipline since social
networks, communication processes, institutions and culture are increasingly
considered as core dimensions. Of course, the conclusion follows exactly the
script of earlier instructions provided by Max Weber or Joseph Schumpeter. |