By: |
Rivera Leon, Llorena (UNU-MERIT);
Mairesse, Jacques (UNU-MERIT, and CREST-ENSAE, France);
Cowan, Robin (UNU-MERIT, and BETA, Université de Strasbourg, France) |
Abstract: |
This paper provides evidence on the existence and determinants of the
publication productivity gender gap in Mexico at the individual level and on
its consequences on the Mexican scientific system and productivity at
disciplinary and aggregate levels. The paper specifies and performs a panel
data econometric analysis based on a sample of Mexican researchers who are
members of the National System of Researchers (SNI) of Mexico in the period
2002-2013. It corrects for a selectivity bias: the existence of periods with
no (or low quality) publication, and endogeneity bias: the promotion to higher
academic ranks. We define and implement counterfactual simulations to both
effects, assess the magnitude of macro-impacts of existing gender gaps and
illustrate the potential effects of a range of policy scenarios. The results
show no significant gender gaps for an average SNI researcher. Moreover, when
correcting for the endogeneity and selectivity biases, we find that the
average female researcher in public universities is around 8% more productive
than her male peers, with most of the observed productivity being explained by
gender differentials in the propensity to have periods of no (or low) quality
publication. We find that barriers to promotion to higher academic ranks are
highest among females in public research centres. Our macro scenarios on
promotion practices, selectivity, collaboration and age show that eliminating
gender gaps would increase aggregate productivity by an average of 7% for
university females and 9% for females in research centres. |
Keywords: |
scientific productivity, gender productivity puzzle, Mexico, economics of science, economics of gender |
JEL: |
C23 I23 |
Date: |
2016–12–21 |
URL: |
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:unm:unumer:2016072&r=sog |