nep-sog New Economics Papers
on Sociology of Economics
Issue of 2014‒11‒22
two papers chosen by
Jonas Holmström
Axventure AB

  1. What Have Economists Been Doing for the Last 50 Years? A Text Analysis of Published Academic Research from 1960-2010 By Lea Kosnik
  2. The economics of research, consulting, and teaching quality: Theory and evidence from a technical university By Stefano BIANCHINI; Francesco LISSONI; Michele PEZZONI; Lorenzo ZIRULIA

  1. By: Lea Kosnik (Department of Economics, University of Missouri-St. Louis)
    Abstract: This paper presents the results of a text based exploratory study of over 20,000 academic articles published in seven top research journals from 1960-2010. The goal is to investigate the general research foci of economists over the last fifty years, how (if at all) they have changed over time, and what trends (if any) can be discerned from a broad body of the top academic research in the field. Of the 19 JEL-code based fields studied in the literature, most have retained a constant level of attention over the time period of this study, however, a notable exception is that of macroeconomics which has undergone a significantly diminishing level of research attention in the last couple of decades, across all the journals under study; at the same time, the “microfoundations” of macroeconomic papers appears to be increasing. Other results are also presented.
    Keywords: Text Analysis, Economics Research, Research Diversity, Topic Analysis.
    JEL: A11 B4
    Date: 2014–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msl:workng:1004&r=sog
  2. By: Stefano BIANCHINI; Francesco LISSONI; Michele PEZZONI; Lorenzo ZIRULIA
    Abstract: We investigate the effect of both research and consulting on higher education teaching quality at the individual level. We propose a theoretical model in which academics allocate limited time between three activities, over a two period horizon, under the assumption of positive spillovers from research to both consulting opportunities and teaching, and of life cycle effects on incentives. Propositions from the model are tested against teaching evaluation data from a mid-sized Italian engineering faculty. We find that research experience improves teaching quality, but only if it does not translate into large consulting opportunities. In that case, research experience provides too strong a disincentive to invest time in teaching, and quality deteriorates.
    Keywords: higher education; teaching; academic consulting; research; economics of science
    JEL: I21 I23 L84 O30
    Date: 2014
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:grt:wpegrt:2014-15&r=sog

This nep-sog issue is ©2014 by Jonas Holmström. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.