nep-sog New Economics Papers
on Sociology of Economics
Issue of 2013‒06‒24
three papers chosen by
Jonas Holmström
Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration

  1. Faculty Workload in a Research Intensive University: A Case Study By Manuel Crespo; Denis Bertrand
  2. Open Access to Data: An Ideal Professed but not Practised By Patrick Andreoli-Versbach; Frank Mueller-Langer
  3. Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought By Benedikt Fecher; Sascha Friesike

  1. By: Manuel Crespo; Denis Bertrand
    Abstract: The literature on faculty workload reports differences in worked weekly hours and in the distribution of total time allocated to teaching, research, and service. Some differences are also reported concerning faculty workload by gender, academic rank, and disciplinary sectors. This study analyzes self-reported faculty workload in a Canadian research intensive university. It introduces a new way of measuring time on task by calculating it in a “typical most loaded month” an in a “typical less loaded month”. Results show an average weekly workload of 56.97 hours of which 44.1% is allocated to teaching, 35.2% to research, 5.8% to administrative tasks and 14.8% to service. There are few differences in faculty workload by gender, academic rank, and disciplinary sectors. Overall, self-reported faculty workload has increased in the last decade partly because of electronic communications and procedures and on-line pedagogical activities. <P>
    Keywords: Faculty workload, teaching, research, service, faculty workload increase, most loaded month, less loaded month, time on task, case study,
    Date: 2013–06–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cir:cirpro:2013rp-11&r=sog
  2. By: Patrick Andreoli-Versbach; Frank Mueller-Langer
    Keywords: ratswd, ratswd working paper, data sharing, data management, germany, data availability, open access, research infrastructure, data, replication, data privacy, metadata, research data centre, infrastructure, open science, open access, data
    JEL: B40 C80 L59
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:rsw:rswwps:rswwps215&r=sog
  3. By: Benedikt Fecher; Sascha Friesike
    Abstract: Open Science is an umbrella term that encompasses a multitude of assumptions about the future of knowledge creation and dissemination. Based on a literature review, this paper aims at structuring the overall discourse by proposing five Open Science schools of thought: The infrastructure school (which is concerned with the technological architecture), the public school (which is concerned with the accessibility of knowledge creation), the measurement school (which is concerned with alternative impact measurement), the democratic school (which is concerned with access to knowledge) and the pragmatic school (which is concerned with collaborative research).
    Keywords: ratswd, ratswd working paper, data sharing, data management, germany, data availability, open access, research infrastructure, data, replication, data privacy, metadata, research data centre, infrastructure, psychdata, data management, psychology, science cooperation, open science, open access, assessment and review, science 2.0, open data, citizen science, schools of thought, altmetrics, science communication
    JEL: H42 H44 I28 K11 L17 Z13
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:rsw:rswwps:rswwps218&r=sog

This nep-sog issue is ©2013 by Jonas Holmström. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.