|
on Sociology of Economics |
Issue of 2009‒04‒13
four papers chosen by Jonas Holmström Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration |
By: | László Á. Kóczy (Budapest Tech); Alexandru Nichifor (Department of Economics, Maastricht University); Martin Strobel (Department of Economics, Maastricht University) |
Abstract: | The quality of publications, approximated by the containing journal's quality indicator, is often the basis for hire and promotion in academic and research positions. Over the years a handful of ranking methods have been proposed. Discussing the most prominent methods we show that they are inherently biased against journals publishing short papers.gáljuk. |
Keywords: | quality ranking, paper length, impact factor, invariant method, LP method |
Date: | 2009 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pkk:wpaper:0902&r=sog |
By: | Kitov, Ivan |
Abstract: | Economics does not need a scientific revolution. Economics needs accurate measurements according to high standards of natural sciences and meticulous work on revealing empirical relationships between measured variables. |
Keywords: | economics; science |
JEL: | A1 |
Date: | 2009–04–04 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:14476&r=sog |
By: | Stefan Krabel (Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena); Donald S. Siegel (University at Albany, SUNY); Viktor Slavtchev (Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena) |
Abstract: | We conjecture that the mobility of academic scientists increases the propensity of such agents to engage in academic entrepreneurship. Our empirical analysis is based on a survey of researchers at the Max Planck Society in Germany. We find that mobile scientists are more likely to become nascent entrepreneurs. Thus, it appears that citizenship and foreign-education are important determinants of the early stages of academic entrepreneurship. |
Keywords: | Academic Entrepreneurship, Human Capital, Scientific Mobility, Knowledge Transfer, Immigrant Entrepreneurship |
JEL: | L26 O31 |
Date: | 2009–04–02 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:jrp:jrpwrp:2009-026&r=sog |
By: | Philippe Aghion; Mathias Dewatripont; Caroline M. Hoxby; Andreu Mas-Colell; André Sapir |
Abstract: | We investigate how university governance affects research output, measured by patenting and international university research rankings. For both European and U.S. universities, we generate several measures of autonomy, governance, and competition for research funding. We show that university autonomy and competition are positively correlated with university output, both among European countries and among U.S. public universities. We then identity a (political) source of exogenous shocks to funding of U.S. universities. We demonstrate that, when a state's universities receive a positive funding shock, they produce more patents if they are more autonomous and face more competition from private research universities. Finally, we show that during periods when merit-based competitions for federal research funding have been most prominent, universities produce more patents when they receive an exogenous funding shock, suggesting that routine participation in such competitions hones research skill. |
JEL: | H0 H52 I2 I23 I28 O3 |
Date: | 2009–04 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:14851&r=sog |