nep-sog New Economics Papers
on Sociology of Economics
Issue of 2007‒07‒20
two papers chosen by
Jonas Holmström
Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration

  1. Modelling the Research Output of Australian Universities by Discipline By Valadkhani, Abbas; Ville, Simon
  2. US Faculty Patenting: Inside and Outside the University By Jerry Thursby; Anne Fuller; Marie Thursby

  1. By: Valadkhani, Abbas (University of Wollongong); Ville, Simon (University of Wollongong)
    Abstract: This paper develops and estimates a cross-sectional model for forecasting research output across the Australian university system. It builds upon an existing literature that focuses either on institutional comparisons or studies of specific subjects, by providing discipline-specific results across all of the ten major disciplinary areas as defined by Australia’s Department of Education, Science and Training (DEST). The model draws upon four discipline-specific explanatory variables; staff size, research expenditure, PhD completions, and student-staff ratios to predict output of refereed articles. When compared with actual averaged output for 2000-2004, the results are highly statistically significant.
    Date: 2006
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uow:depec1:wp06-26&r=sog
  2. By: Jerry Thursby; Anne Fuller; Marie Thursby
    Abstract: This paper examines the empirical anomaly that in a sample of 5811 patents on which US faculty are listed as inventors, 26% of the patents are assigned solely to firms rather than to the faculty member's university as is dictated by US university employment policies or the Bayh Dole Act. In this paper we estimate a series of probability models of assignment as a function of patent characteristics, university policy, and inventor fields in order to examine the extent to which outside assignment is nefarious or comes from legitimate activities, such as consulting. Patents assigned to firms (whether established or start-ups with inventor as principal) are less basic than those assigned to universities suggesting these patents result from faculty consulting. A higher inventor share increases the likelihood of university assignment as compared with assignment to a firm in which the inventor is a principal but it has no effect on consulting with established firms versus assignment to the university. Faculty in the physical sciences and engineering are more likely to assign their patents to established firms than those in biological sciences.
    JEL: L24 L26 O31 O34 O38
    Date: 2007–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:13256&r=sog

This nep-sog issue is ©2007 by Jonas Holmström. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.