nep-soc New Economics Papers
on Social Norms and Social Capital
Issue of 2024‒06‒17
seven papers chosen by
Fabio Sabatini, Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”


  1. The Costs and Benefits of Clan Culture: Elite Control versus Cooperation in China By Shuo Chen; Raymond Fisman; Xiaohuan Lan; Yongxiang Wang; Qing Ye
  2. Toward a Holistic Approach to Central Bank Trust By Sandra Eickmeier; Luba Petersen
  3. I know best: Scepticism about the Knowledge of Experts and Peers on Economics Predictions By Agranov, M.; Elliott, M.; Ortoleva, P.
  4. The Effect of Social Media on Elections: Evidence from the United States By Fujiwara, Thomas; Muller, Karsten; Schwarz, Carlo
  5. Opinion Polls, Turnout and the Demand for Safe Seats By Alabrese, Eleonora; Fetzer, Thiemo
  6. Analysis of Proximity Informed User Behavior in a Global Online Social Network By Nils Breitmar; Matthew C. Harding; Hanqiao Zhang
  7. A revolt of the distrustful? Political trust, political protest and the democratic deficit By Grande, Edgar; Gonzatti, Daniel Saldivia

  1. By: Shuo Chen; Raymond Fisman; Xiaohuan Lan; Yongxiang Wang; Qing Ye
    Abstract: Kinship ties are a common institution that may facilitate in-group coordination and cooperation. Yet their benefits – or lack thereof – depend crucially on the broader institutional environment. We study how the prevalence of clan ties affect how communities confronted two well-studied historical episodes from the early years of the People's Republic of China, utilizing four distinct proxies for county clan strength: the presence of recognized ancestral halls; genealogical records; rice suitability; and geographic latitude. We show that the loss of livestock associated with 1955-56 collectivization (which mandated that farmers surrender livestock for little compensation) documented by Chen and Lan (2017) was much less pronounced in strong-clan areas. By contrast, we show that the 1959-61 Great Famine was associated with higher mortality in areas with stronger clan ties. We argue that reconciling these two conflicting patterns requires that we take a broader view of how kinship groups interact with other governance institutions, in particular the role of kinship as a means of elite control.
    JEL: N95 P32 Z10
    Date: 2024–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:32414&r=
  2. By: Sandra Eickmeier; Luba Petersen
    Abstract: We examine public trust in the European Central Bank (ECB) and its determinants using data from the Bundesbank Household Panel survey for Germany. Employing an interdisciplinary approach that integrates insights from political science and psychology, we offer a fresh perspective on the factors influencing central bank trust that is more holistic than the conventional one. Our primary findings can be summarized as follows. Households who state that competence, which we define as the ECB’s performance in maintaining stable prices and making decisions grounded in rules, science, and data, matters for their trust in the ECB, tend to express higher trust in the ECB. Conversely, those who place greater importance on values, particularly the integrity of top central bankers, honest communication and broader concern, tend to trust the ECB less. Trust in the ECB also hinges on trust in political institutions more generally and, to a lesser extent, on generalized trust (i.e. trust in others).
    Keywords: central banks, trust, survey, trust, central bank communication, values, experiences, credibility
    JEL: E7 E58 E59 C93 D84 Z13 Z18
    Date: 2024–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:een:camaaa:2024-31&r=
  3. By: Agranov, M.; Elliott, M.; Ortoleva, P.
    Abstract: Are individuals willing to change their minds when experts or their peers disagree with them? In an incentivized experiment on a representative sample, we collect binary predictions on unemployment and inflation. Then, we ask whether participants would like to change their predictions if the (vast) majority of experts (or peers) made the other choice. Very few participants are willing to change their predictions indicating a profound lack of trust in experts and the collective wisdom of peers. Nevertheless, there is variation by demographics. Further, scepticism in experts in this domain helps explain participants intention to vaccinate, providing some external validity.
    Keywords: Trust, Experts, Social learning, Information policies
    JEL: D80 D83 C90
    Date: 2024–05–14
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cam:camdae:2423&r=
  4. By: Fujiwara, Thomas (Princeton University, Department of Economics and SPIA, and NBER); Muller, Karsten (National University of Singapore, Business School); Schwarz, Carlo (Universita Bocconi, Department of Economics and IGIER, and PERICLES)
    Abstract: We study how social media affects election outcomes in the United States. We use variation in the number of Twitter users across counties induced by early adopters at the 2007 South by Southwest (SXSW) festival, a key event in Twitter’s rise to popularity. We show that this variation is unrelated to observable county characteristics and electoral outcomes before the launch of Twitter. Our results indicate that Twitter lowered the Republican vote share in the 2016 and 2020 presidential elections, but had limited effects on Congressional elections and previous presidential elections. Evidence from survey data, primary elections, and text analysis of millions of tweets suggests that Twitter’s relatively liberal content may have persuaded voters with moderate views to vote against Donald Trump.
    Keywords: JEL Classification:
    Date: 2024
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cge:wacage:700&r=
  5. By: Alabrese, Eleonora (University of Bath and QAPEC); Fetzer, Thiemo (University of Warwick, University of Bonn, ECONtribute, STICERD, CAGE, NIESR, CESifo, and CEPR)
    Abstract: Do opinion polls sway turnout and shape political competition in majoritarian systems? Can they strengthen the persistence of safe seats? Analysing national opinion polls during UK general elections and the perceived safeness of constituencies, we find that pre-election polls significantly affect voter turnout. Non-competitive elections predicted by national polls suppress turnout, especially in areas with low perceived electoral competition. This reinforces the advantage of trailing parties in their strongholds, potentially fuelling party demand for safe seats that may give rise to demands for gerrymandering. This can exacerbate spatial polarization of the electoral landscape, with implications for governance regarding opinion polling.
    Keywords: Opinion Polls, Closeness, Voters’ Behaviour, First past-the-post, UK general elections JEL Classification: D72, P16
    Date: 2024
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cge:wacage:707&r=
  6. By: Nils Breitmar; Matthew C. Harding; Hanqiao Zhang
    Abstract: Despite the earlier claim of "Death of Distance", recent studies revealed that geographical proximity still greatly influences link formation in online social networks. However, it is unclear how physical distances are intertwined with users' online behaviors in a virtual world. We study the role of spatial dependence on a global online social network with a dyadic Logit model. Results show country-specific patterns for distance effect on probabilities to build connections. Effects are stronger when the possibility for two people to meet in person exists. Relative to weak ties, dependence on proximity is looser for strong social ties.
    Date: 2024–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:arx:papers:2404.18979&r=
  7. By: Grande, Edgar; Gonzatti, Daniel Saldivia
    Abstract: During recent crises in Europe, new heterogeneous protest movements have emerged that are difficult to label and classify. Existing studies suggest that the common denominator of these protesters is primarily the lack of political trust. Therefore, these new protest movements offer favorable conditions for investigating the relationship between political trust and protest, and the consequences of political distrust for the stability of democracy. Do these protests represent a revolt of the distrustful which intensifies the frequently invoked crisis of democracy? Our study answers this question by focusing on two recent protest movements, the COVID-19 protest and the so-called 'energy protest', which have been an important part of the Ger-man protest landscape in recent years. Based on new survey data, our results reveal a considerable lack of trust in the core institutions of representative democracy in Germany and that political distrust increases the readiness for protest and the acceptance of political violence. The consequences of distrust for democracy are ambiguous, however. The distrustful citizens are strong supporters of direct democracy but hold illiberal and restrictive attitudes towards minorities and migrants. Hence, there are good reasons to be distrustful towards the distrustful citizens on the streets.
    Keywords: protest, political trust, political violence, democratic deficit, social movements
    Date: 2024
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:wzbccs:295743&r=

This nep-soc issue is ©2024 by Fabio Sabatini. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.