nep-sbm New Economics Papers
on Small Business Management
Issue of 2010‒08‒14
three papers chosen by
Joao Carlos Correia Leitao
University of Beira Interior and Technical University of Lisbon

  1. Innovation, R&D Investment and Productivity: Uruguayan Manufacturing Firms By Adriana Cassoni; Magdalena Ramada
  2. Does FDI spur innovation, productivity and knowledge sourcing by incumbent firms? Evidence from manufacturing industry in Estonia By Priit Vahter
  3. Affiliation and Firm Performance: Evidence from Indian Business Groups By Ghosh, Saibal

  1. By: Adriana Cassoni; Magdalena Ramada
    Abstract: Uruguay’s inability to sustain high levels of economic growth cannot be fully explained by external shocks, the prevailing institutional setting or the level of human capital accumulation. Instead, low investment in knowledge capital stands as a most likely explanation. This hypothesis is supported by empirical evidence analyzed in this study. Returns on innovation were found to be significant, promoting a non-negligible acceleration of labor productivity gains. However, the propensity to innovate and the intensity of the effort expended critically depend on the firm’s already having a high internal efficiency level. As firms’ behavior is differentiated depending on the type of innovation output pursued, the significantly higher frequency of processes relative to product-innovative firms is matched by the larger impact of novel processes with respect to products on labor productivity. However, the degree of novelty of process innovation is significantly inferior to that of product innovation. The research points to inadequate choices of input mixes as the underlying cause. Policy recommendations center on finding adequate channels to generate and disseminate information on the optimal input mixes depending on the type of innovation output sought.
    Keywords: Innovation input, Innovation output, Productivity growth, CDM model
    JEL: O31 O32 D21
    Date: 2010–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:idb:wpaper:4680&r=sbm
  2. By: Priit Vahter
    Abstract: Does FDI affect productivity growth, innovation, and knowledge sourcing activities of domestic firms? This study employs detailed firm-level panel-data from Estonia’s manufacturing sector to investigate different channels through which FDI can affect domestic firms. I use instrumental variables approach to identify the effects. I find no evidence of an effect of FDI entry on local incumbents’ TFP and labour productivityg rowth in the short term. The effect on productivity does not depend on the local firms’ distance to the productivity frontier. However, there are positive spillovers on process innovation. The results show significant positive correlation between the entry of FDI in a sector and the more direct measures of spillovers in subsequent periods. This is consistent with the view that FDI inflow to a sector intensifies knowledge flows to domestic firms.
    Keywords: foreign direct investment, productivity, innovation, learning
    JEL: F21 F23 O31 O33
    Date: 2010–04–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wdi:papers:2010-986&r=sbm
  3. By: Ghosh, Saibal
    Abstract: Using data on a sample of Indian firms from 1996-2006, we examine the effect of group affiliation on firm performance. After controlling for the differences in firm size, growth opportunities and leverage, the findings indicate that group affiliation exerts a salutary impact on firm performance, measured in terms of adjusted Q or RoA. Moreover, the evidence indicates that tunneling is not an important factor driving the valuation and profitability effect of group affiliation.
    Keywords: Business groups; Adjusted Q; RoA; Tunneling; Promoter’s share; India
    JEL: G32
    Date: 2010–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:24291&r=sbm

This nep-sbm issue is ©2010 by Joao Carlos Correia Leitao. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.