nep-pub New Economics Papers
on Public Finance
Issue of 2026–09–14
eleven papers chosen by
Kwang Soo Cheong, Johns Hopkins University


  1. How Does Federal Income Tax Progressivity Vary by Income Source? By Yu-Ting Chiang; Collin Eldridge
  2. Policy Thresholds as Growth Barriers: Theory and Evidence from a Payroll Tax Notch By Sami Jysmä; Youssef Benzarti; Jarkko Harju
  3. Special Economic Zones and How to Tax Them By Flurim Aliu; Mario Mansour; Mr. Christophe J Waerzeggers
  4. Policy Thresholds as Growth Barriers: Theory and Evidence from a Payroll Tax Notch By Sami Jysmä; Youssef Benzarti; Jarkko Harju
  5. Design matters: Firm-level evidence on tax treaty provisions and multinational investment By Shehaj, Pranvera
  6. Social benefit salience under risk of unemployment By Esslinger, Anna
  7. Capital gains taxation and asset price volatility By Pau Belda
  8. Nonlinear Profit Shifting: Evidence from Administrative Firm-Level Data By Daniel Suva
  9. Rising Income Risk at the Top By J. Carter Braxton; Kyle F. Herkenhoff; Chengdai Huang; Michael Nattinger; Jonathan L. Rothbaum; Lawrence D.W. Schmidt
  10. Tax Rules and Capital Reallocation: Real Effects of Anti-Tax Avoidance Policies By Jamal, Usama
  11. Rust in Motion: The Political Environmental Trap of Vehicle Tax Exemptions By Gabriel Facundes Monteiro; Edson R. Severnini

  1. By: Yu-Ting Chiang; Collin Eldridge
    Abstract: While the federal income tax system is progressive, the degree of progressivity depends on whether income comes from wages or from other sources.
    Keywords: income taxes; wage taxation; investment taxation
    Date: 2026–09–03
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fip:l00001:103739
  2. By: Sami Jysmä; Youssef Benzarti; Jarkko Harju
    Abstract: Discrete policy thresholds are pervasive in tax and regulatory systems and can substantially distort behavior. We show that notches acting as barriers to mobility within a distribution generate distortions extending far beyond the threshold. The same mechanism biases conventional difference-in-differences estimators, and we propose a new methodology to recover causal effects. Applying the method to the abolition of a size-based payroll tax notch, we find that the notch reduced the number of firms above the threshold by 18 percent and lowered treated firms’ employment, capital stock, and value added by 10 percent, whereas conventional difference-in-differences estimates imply negligible effects.
    JEL: C01 H25 H30
    Date: 2026–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35484
  3. By: Flurim Aliu; Mario Mansour; Mr. Christophe J Waerzeggers
    Abstract: Special economic zones (SEZs) are widely used to attract investment, promote exports, and support industrialization, yet their performance is uneven and often uncertain. This IMF How To Note reviews global experience with SEZs—their rapid expansion, diverse design, and mixed economic impact—and highlights that many operate as enclaves with limited spillovers and high fiscal costs. While generous tax incentives are common, evidence suggests they are rarely decisive drivers of investment and can lead to significant revenue losses, distortions, and opportunities for profit shifting. The note provides practical guidance for policymakers on how to design and tax SEZs effectively. It emphasizes that taxation should generally remain neutral relative to the domestic economy, with any incentives closely aligned to clear policy objectives, time-bound, and subject to regular evaluation. Priority should be given to well-designed indirect tax regimes, and cost-based investment incentives rather than profit-based tax holidays. Ultimately, the success of SEZs depends far more on fundamentals—such as infrastructure, governance, regulatory efficiency, and integration with the domestic economy—than on tax breaks alone.
    Keywords: Final Keywords special economic zones; tax incentives; direct taxes; indirect taxes; customs; international tax issues; trade liberalization; Sub-Saharan Africa; Africa; Middle East and Central Asia; Asia and Pacific; Middle East; Central America; Western Hemisphere; Central Asia
    Date: 2026–08–27
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:imf:imfhtn:2026/005
  4. By: Sami Jysmä; Youssef Benzarti; Jarkko Harju
    Abstract: Discrete policy thresholds are pervasive in tax and regulatory systems and can substantially distort behavior. We show that notches acting as barriers to mobility within a distribution generate distortions extending far beyond the threshold. The same mechanism biases conventional difference-in-differences estimators, and we propose a new methodology to recover causal effects. Applying the method to the abolition of a size-based payroll tax notch, we find that the notch reduced the number of firms above the threshold by 18 percent and lowered treated firms’ employment, capital stock, and value added by 10 percent, whereas conventional difference-in-differences estimates imply negligible effects.
    Keywords: Size-based regulation, Notches, Difference-in-differences, Payroll tax
    JEL: H30 C01 H25
    Date: 2026–08–13
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pst:wpaper:363
  5. By: Shehaj, Pranvera
    Abstract: This study provides the first firm-level evidence on how the residence country's double tax relief method and tax sparing provisions in asymmetric tax treaties affect foreign investment by OECD multinational enterprises in low-and-middle income countries. Combining unconsolidated subsidiary-level data for 2005-2016 with detailed tax treaty information, the analysis distinguishes between investment entry (extensive margin), investment intensity (intensive margin), and the directness of the investment route. The results show that treaty-induced changes in the residence country's relief method do not affect subsidiary creation once investment routing is taken into account, while tax sparing provisions consistently encourage market entry. At the intensive margin, improvements in the residence country's relief method increase investment intensity only for firms investing through indirect routes, whereas tax sparing provisions have either no effect or are negatively associated with reinvestment. These findings reveal substantial heterogeneity concealed by aggregate FDI data and demonstrate that the investment effects of tax treaty provisions differ across firms depending on whether they enter or expand, as well as on the route through which they invest.
    Keywords: Tax treaties, Double relief method, Tax sparing, New foreign subsidiaries, Gross investments, MNEs, Developing countries
    JEL: F21 F23 F53 H25 H73 C23
    Date: 2026
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:fubsbe:343047
  6. By: Esslinger, Anna
    Abstract: This study investigates how the connection of taxation to public benefits can decrease tax payers' perceived tax burden, affecting their labor-leisure decision. We present a model of tax and benefit (mis)-perception, in which payoff maximizing work effort increases when the perceived tax burden de- creases. Increasing the salience of benefits funded by taxation and the prob- ability of receiving them decreases this perceived tax burden. We use two real-effort online experiments to test the suppositions of the model. In a flat tax system, we find that lack of information on the accrual of benefits increases perceived tax burden and decreases labor supply. In a progressive tax system, we find that full benefit salience improves motivation to re- main in the unemployment insurance system and that effort increases under benefit salience when the unemployment rate is high. As such, behavioral responses to the salience of benefits also requires the expectation of their need.
    Keywords: Work Motivation, Online Experiment, Tax and Benefit Salience, Unemployment Insurance
    JEL: D91 H24 J22 J31
    Date: 2026
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:aluord:343050
  7. By: Pau Belda (Bank of England)
    Abstract: Do capital gains tax cuts destabilize or stabilize asset prices? In an asset pricing model with heterogeneous agents and realization-based taxation, a tax cut has two opposing effects. It dampens volatility by reducing realization-based trading frictions, but also amplifies it by strengthening the pass through from expectations to prices, fuelling self-fulfilling fluctuations. Estimated on US stock-market data, the model implies that the sequence of tax cuts since the 1970s triggered a net increase in volatility of about +35%, driven primarily by stronger belief-to-price pass-through. Policy experiments suggest a tax on unrealized gains robustly reduces volatility, whereas a financial transaction tax has mixed effects.
    Keywords: Capital gains taxation;asset pricing;learning
    JEL: D83 D84 E44 G12 G14 H20 H31
    Date: 2026–08–21
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:boe:boeewp:023541
  8. By: Daniel Suva (Institute of Economic Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University)
    Abstract: This paper revisits the empirical evidence on multinational profit shifting using a unique confidential administrative dataset from the General Financial Directorate of the Czech Republic, which includes firm-level Country-by-Country Reporting from every international enterprise operating in Czechia. The analysis reveals a shift in the selection of profit-shifting destinations in recent years. Between 2016 and 2023, the share of global profits shifted into European profit centres decreased from 78.7% to 40.9%, while Caribbean destinations rose in importance. Additionally, our results affirm the emerging pattern in contemporary literature, in which micro-level datasets systematically yield more conservative estimates of the magnitude of profit shifting than previous macro-level studies. Lastly, the exceptional level of granularity in our data enables us to confirm the extreme nonlinearity of the semi-elastic relationship between booked corporate profits and effective tax rates, with both logarithmic and cubic specifications emerging as the most suitable functional forms, each performing best under different conditions - cubic model capturing the proportional responses more effectively across the full distribution, while logarithmic specification better accommodates localized curvature and asymmetries at extreme tax rate ranges.
    Keywords: profit shifting; multinational enterprises; corporate taxation; administrative data
    JEL: F23 H26 H32
    Date: 2026–09
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp2026_27
  9. By: J. Carter Braxton; Kyle F. Herkenhoff; Chengdai Huang; Michael Nattinger; Jonathan L. Rothbaum; Lawrence D.W. Schmidt
    Abstract: We document an increase in U.S. income risk from 1969 to 2019 using newly digitized IRS tax returns, distinguishing permanent from transitory risk. Since the 1970s, permanent income risk increased across the distribution, but most sharply among high earners, rising nearly 70% among the top 5%. We show that, even among top earners, large negative income shocks strongly predict financial distress and higher income risk is linked with higher savings. In a quantitative life-cycle model, rising income risk concentrated at the top lowers the risk-free rate by 0.7pp, increases wealth inequality, and contributes to the "savings glut of the rich."
    JEL: D15 E21
    Date: 2026–08
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35664
  10. By: Jamal, Usama
    Abstract: Governments worldwide are strengthening corporate tax enforcement to protect revenue, yet the impact of these policies on internal capital allocation within multinational firms remains underexplored. This paper examines the real and fiscal effects of Earnings Stripping Rules (ESR)—a major reform limiting debt-based profit shifting, now adopted by over 90 jurisdictions. Using a large affiliate-level panel and multiple research designs, I document that ESR adoption triggers sharp increases in reported profits and effective tax rates, but simultaneously reduces local investment and employment. Multinational groups offset these declines by reallocating activity to affiliates in non-adopting jurisdictions, effectively preserving an international escape margin. Notably, this reallocation pattern reverses when ESR adoption is coordinated globally: domestic sister affiliates expand, and foreign reallocation ceases. These findings demonstrate that the real effects of enforcement depend critically on policy coordination, determining whether anti-avoidance rules distort the geography of global capital or raise revenue without displacing economic activity abroad.
    Keywords: Tax Avoidance, Multinational Investment, Profit Shifting
    Date: 2026–07
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpm:docweb:2603
  11. By: Gabriel Facundes Monteiro; Edson R. Severnini
    Abstract: Transportation is a major source of greenhouse gas and air pollution emissions worldwide, with most automobile pollution coming from vehicles older than 10 years. Yet, many policies discourage the removal of older vehicles from the fleet, with potential consequences for pollution and public health. This paper examines an equity-motivated anti-scrappage policy in Brazil using a border-pair design that exploits state variation in the age thresholds for vehicle ownership tax exemptions. Using municipality-level vehicle registration data from 2013-2020, we find that lower exemption age thresholds increase the average fleet age by up to one year, as they encourage owners to retain vehicles until they qualify for tax exemptions. Using fleet- and satellite-based estimates of pollution and administrative health data, we show that these policies increase on-road CO2 emissions per capita by up to 23% and PM2.5 concentrations by 4%, while deteriorating infant health outcomes. Leveraging state reforms that raised exemption ages, we find evidence that incumbents face greater electoral penalties wherever a greater share of the vehicle fleet re-enters the tax base, consistent with a “political environmental trap.” Within an MVPF framework, we find that lowering the exemption age by five years generates a net welfare loss of $0.78 for every $1 of forgone government revenue.
    JEL: H23 I18 Q53 Q56 Q58
    Date: 2026–09
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:35713

This nep-pub issue is ©2026 by Kwang Soo Cheong. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the Griffith Business School of Griffith University in Australia.