nep-pub New Economics Papers
on Public Finance
Issue of 2020‒09‒21
four papers chosen by
Kwang Soo Cheong
Johns Hopkins University

  1. Corporate Tax Avoidance and Industry Concentration By Julien Martin; Mathieu Parenti; Farid Toubal
  2. Optimal Tax-Transfer Rules under Equilibrium and New Labour Demand Scenarios By Colombino, Ugo; Islam, Nizamul
  3. Royalty Taxation under Profit Shifting and Competition for FDI By Juranek, Steffen; Schindler, Dirk; Schneider, Andrea
  4. Investor Tax Credits and Entrepreneurship: Evidence from U.S. States By Matthew R. Denes; Sabrina T. Howell; Filippo Mezzanotti; Xinxin Wang; Ting Xu

  1. By: Julien Martin; Mathieu Parenti; Farid Toubal
    Abstract: This paper argues that tax avoidance by large corporations has contributed to the 25% increase in concentration among U.S. firms since the mid-1990s. Corporate tax avoidance gives large firms a competitive edge, which translates into larger market shares and an increase in the granularity of the economy. We develop IV and difference-in-differences strategies that show the causal impact of tax avoidance on firm-level sales. Had firms not resorted to tax avoidance in 2017, our results imply that the average industry concentration would have been 8.3% lower, which is around its early 2000 level.
    Keywords: tax avoidance, industry concentration, IRS audit probability
    JEL: D22 H26 L11 D40 F23
    Date: 2020
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_8469&r=all
  2. By: Colombino, Ugo (University of Turin); Islam, Nizamul (LISER (CEPS/INSTEAD))
    Abstract: We present an extension of the numerical approach to empirical optimal taxation allowed by a peculiar structure of a microeconometric model of labour supply that includes a representation of the demand side. This makes it possible to identify optimal tax-transfer rules while accounting for equilibrium constraints and to evaluate the effects of exogenous labour demand shocks. We provide illustrative examples using the 2015 EU-SILC data set for Italy.
    Keywords: empirical optimal taxation, microsimulation, microeconometrics, evaluation of tax-transfer rules, equilibrium, labour demand shocks
    JEL: H21 C18
    Date: 2020–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp13541&r=all
  3. By: Juranek, Steffen (Dept. of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics); Schindler, Dirk (Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam); Schneider, Andrea (Jönköping International Business School)
    Abstract: Multinational corporations increasingly use royalty payments for intellectual property rights to shift profits globally. This threatens not only the tax base of countries worldwide, it also affects the nature of competition for foreign direct investment (FDI). Against this background, our theoretical analysis suggests a surprising solution to the problem of curbing profit shifting without suffering major FDI losses: A strictly positive withholding tax on royalty payments is both the Pareto-efficient solution under international coordination and the optimal unilateral response. If internal debt is sufficiently responsive, governments can even implement Paretooptimal targeting. Then, the royalty tax closes the profit-shifting channel, while all competition for FDI is relegated to internal-debt regulation. Our results question the ban of royalty taxes in double tax treaties and the EU Interest and Royalty Directive.
    Keywords: Source tax on royalties; foreign direct investment; multinationals; profit shifting; internal debt; EU Interest and Royalty Directive
    JEL: F23 H25 O23
    Date: 2020–09–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:nhhfms:2020_011&r=all
  4. By: Matthew R. Denes; Sabrina T. Howell; Filippo Mezzanotti; Xinxin Wang; Ting Xu
    Abstract: Angel investor tax credits are used globally to spur high-growth entrepreneurship. Exploiting the staggered implementation of these tax credits in 31 U.S. states, we find that while they increase angel investment, they have no significant effect on entrepreneurial activity. Tax credits induce entry by inexperienced, local investors and are often used by insiders. A survey of 1,411 angel investors suggests that a “home run” investing approach alongside coordination and information frictions explain low take-up among experienced investors. The results contrast with evidence that direct subsidies to firms have large positive effects, raising concerns about using investor subsidies to promote entrepreneurship.
    JEL: G0 G14 G28 H0 H25 O3
    Date: 2020–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:27751&r=all

This nep-pub issue is ©2020 by Kwang Soo Cheong. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.