nep-pub New Economics Papers
on Public Finance
Issue of 2014‒06‒22
ten papers chosen by
Kwang Soo Cheong
Johns Hopkins University

  1. On Equal Cost Sharing in the Provision of an Excludable Public Good By Jordi Massó; Antonio Nicoloó; Tridib Sharma; Levent Ülkü
  2. Optimal taxation with home production By Olovsson, Conny
  3. Optimal Tax Base with Administrative Fixed Costs By Stéphane Gauthier
  4. The Choice of the Personal Income Tax Base By Roger H. Gordon; Wojciech Kopczuk
  5. Property Taxation, Bounded Rationality and House Prices By Elinder, Mikael; Persson, Lovisa
  6. A lost decade? Decomposing the effect of 2001-11 tax-benefit policy changes on the income distribution in EU countries By John Hills; Alari Paulus; Holly Sutherland; Iva Tasseva
  7. The Effect of Capital Taxes on Household's Portfolio Composition and Intertemporal Choice: Evidence from the Dutch 2001 Capital Income Tax Reform By Zoutman, Floris T.
  8. Income taxation, labour supply and housework: a discrete choice model for French couples By Jan Kabatek; Arthur Van Soest; Elena Stancanelli
  9. Payroll tax reductions and job flows in France By Richard Duhautois; Fabrice Gilles
  10. A Microsimulation model of the Slovak Tax-Benefit System By Zuzana Siebertova; Norbert Svarda; Jana Valachyova

  1. By: Jordi Massó (Departamento de Economía e Historia Económica, Universidad Autònoma de Barcelona y Barcelona GSE); Antonio Nicoloó (Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche. Università degli Studi di Padova.); Tridib Sharma (Centro de Investigación Económica (CIE), Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM)); Levent Ülkü (Centro de Investigación Económica (CIE), Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM))
    Abstract: We study the effciency and fairness properties of the equal cost sharing mechanism in the provision of a binary and excludable public good. According to the maximal welfare loss criterion, equal cost sharing is optimal within the class of strategyproof, individually rational and no-budgetde…cit mechanisms only when there are 2 agents. In general the equal cost
    Keywords: Excludable public good, Equal cost sharing, Maximal welfare loss
    JEL: D71
    Date: 2013
  2. By: Olovsson, Conny (Research Department, Central Bank of Sweden)
    Abstract: Optimal taxes for Europe and the U.S. are derived in a realistically calibrated model in which agents buy consumption goods and services and use home capital and labor to produce household services. The optimal tax rate on services is substantially lower than the tax rate on goods. Specifically, the planner cannot tax home production directly and instead lowers the tax rate on market services to increase the relative price of home production. The optimal tax rate on the return to home capital is strictly positive and the welfare gains from switching to optimal taxes are large.
    Keywords: Optimal Taxation; Household Production; Time Allocation; Labor Supply
    JEL: D13 H21 J22
    Date: 2014–04–01
  3. By: Stéphane Gauthier (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - CNRS : UMR8174 - Université Paris I - Panthéon-Sorbonne, EEP-PSE - Ecole d'Économie de Paris - Paris School of Economics - Ecole d'Économie de Paris)
    Abstract: This note characterizes the optimal base for commodity taxation in the presence of administrative fixed costs varying across goods. For low tax rates, the optimal base only comprises commodities whose discouragement index is greater than the ratio of their administrative costs to the tax they yield. An illustration with UK data shows that a category of goods should be taxed only if the revenue generated on this category is at least ten times greater than its administrative fixed cost. The cost imputable to the category of goods taxed at the standard rate would be at most 6 percent of total VAT revenue.The administration cost associated with categories of goods currently tax free could justify exemption.
    Keywords: indirect taxation; VAT; tax base; administrative costs
    Date: 2013–12
  4. By: Roger H. Gordon; Wojciech Kopczuk
    Abstract: Starting with Vickrey (1945) and Mirrlees (1971), the optimal tax literature has studied the design of a personal income tax. The assumed ideal would be to tax earnings ability. Earnings ability is unobservable for tax purposes, however. Past papers have focused instead on designing a tax on labor income. Existing tax bases, though, depend on a broader range of information about each individual than just labor income. In principle, this supplementary information can help in designing a tax that has more attractive distributional properties, by more closely approximating an ability tax. The objective of this paper is to lay out theoretically and estimate empirically how to make best use of available information about each individual in addition to earnings, in a setting where the first-best tax would be an ability tax. The theory lays out an equity/efficiency trade off when choosing the tax base. In the empirical work, we find the tax base that is best on equity grounds alone. We find that the choice to tax couples based on their joint income, and the inclusion of dividends, interest income, and a dependents' deduction in the tax base in roughly their current form can be rationalized simply based on their value in better approximating an ability tax, without any need for supplementary motivations for these provisions. However, the inclusion of mortgage and property tax payments in the list of itemized deductions cannot be defended on these grounds.
    JEL: H21 H23
    Date: 2014–06
  5. By: Elinder, Mikael (Department of Economics, Uppsala University); Persson, Lovisa (Department of Economics, Uppsala University)
    Abstract: In 2008, the Swedish property tax was reformed and a cap on yearly tax liabilities was introduced. A large fraction of owner occupied houses was subject to a substantial decrease in the tax. When the reform was announced, most analysts projected – in line with tax capitalization theory – that the tax decrease would lead to significant increases in house prices. We estimate price responses and capitalization degrees, using various DID strategies, in which the price dynamics of houses that were subject to a generous tax reduction are compared to the price dynamics of houses with a more modest reduction. Our results are largely inconsistent with capitalization theory. For the majority of properties, we find no evidence that the tax cut led to increases inhouse prices. However, we find evidence of partial capitalization in sub-markets with highly valued properties, highly educated citizens and were it is especially difficult to increase supply. We argue that theories of bounded rationality can help explain why house buyers may fail to take a tax decrease into account in the valuation of houses.
    Keywords: Announcement effects; Capitalization; Financial literacy; Housing market; Inattention; Saliency
    JEL: D01 D03 D04 D12 H22 H24 R21 R38
    Date: 2014–06–19
  6. By: John Hills; Alari Paulus; Holly Sutherland; Iva Tasseva
    Abstract: This paper examines the extent to which tax and benefit policy changes introduced in the period 2001-11 had a poverty- or inequality-reducing effect. We assess whether the period was indeed a “missed opportunity” for policy changes to make a difference to poverty reduction since the Lisbon Treaty, given the general lack of improvement shown by poverty indicators. Our analysis uses the tax-benefit model EUROMOD and covers seven diverse EU countries: Belgium, Bulgaria, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Italy and the United Kingdom. We apply the Bargain and Callan (2010) decomposition approach, extending it by separating the effect due to structural policy changes and the indexation effect. We find that the latter was typically more effective in alleviating poverty and inequality than changes to the structure of policies. In fact, most of the structural changes that governments introduced, especially in the 2007-11 crisis-onset period, had poverty and inequality-increasing effects. We find considerable variation between countries in how different policy instruments have been adjusted, and in the effects of these adjustments by income, by age and by household composition, showing the importance of understanding them together, rather than discussing just some in isolation.
    Keywords: tax-benefit policies, European Union, income distribution, income poverty, microsimulation, EUROMOD
    JEL: D31 H23 H53 I32
    Date: 2014–06
  7. By: Zoutman, Floris T. (Dept. of Business and Management Science, Norwegian School of Economics)
    Abstract: This paper estimates the effect of capital taxation on portfolio composition and savings using quasi-experimental variation generated by the Dutch 2001 capital tax reform. The reform drove a wedge between the taxation of housing and financial wealth and in addition affected the after-tax return on all assets. I use unique administrative household panel data with information on capital income, wealth and portfolio shares to exploit this variation. I derive and estimate a semi-structural model which directly relates the share invested in financial wealth to the after-tax return on financial and housing wealth. In addition, I link accumulated wealth in the reform-period to the change in the after-tax return on total wealth. Elasticities have the expected sign but are modest in size. I find some evidence for heterogeneity in the behavioral response. In particular, rich and single households seem to be more responsive in terms of both portfolio composition and wealth accumulation, than other households. The estimated elasticities can be used in capital tax models to calibrate the optimal tax rate.
    Keywords: Tax Reform; Capital Taxation of Households; Portfolio Composition; Intertemporal Behavior
    JEL: G11 G18 H24 H31
    Date: 2014–06–11
  8. By: Jan Kabatek (Tilburg University [Tilburg] - Netspar); Arthur Van Soest (Tilburg University [Tilburg] - Netspar); Elena Stancanelli (CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - CNRS : UMR8174 - Université Paris I - Panthéon-Sorbonne, EEP-PSE - Ecole d'Économie de Paris - Paris School of Economics - Ecole d'Économie de Paris)
    Abstract: Earlier studies suggest that income taxation may affect not only labour supply but also domestic work. Here we investigate the impact of income taxation on partners' labour supply and housework, using data for France that taxes incomes of married couples jointly. We estimate a household utility model in which the marginal utilities of leisure and housework of both partners are modelled as random coefficients, depending on observed and unobserved characteristics. We conclude that both partners' market and housework hours are responsive to changes in the tax system. A policy simulation suggests that replacing joint taxation of married spouses' incomes with separate taxation would increase the husband's housework hours by 1.3% and reduce his labour supply by 0.8%. The wife's market hours would increase by 3.7%, and her housework hours would fall by 2.0%.
    Keywords: Time use; Taxation; Discrete choice models
    Date: 2014–04
  9. By: Richard Duhautois (CEE - Centre d'études de l'emploi - Ministère de l'Enseignement supérieur et Recherche - Ministère du Travail, de l'Emploi et de la Santé, ERUDITE - Equipe de Recherche sur l'Utilisation des Données Individuelles Temporelles en Economie - Université Paris-Est Créteil Val-de-Marne (UPEC) : EA437 - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée (UPEMLV)); Fabrice Gilles (EQUIPPE - ECONOMIE QUANTITATIVE, INTEGRATION, POLITIQUES PUBLIQUES ET ECONOMETRIE - Université Lille I - Sciences et technologies - Université Lille II - Droit et santé - Université Lille III - Sciences humaines et sociales - PRES Université Lille Nord de France, TEPP - Travail, Emploi et Politiques Publiques - CNRS : FR3435 - Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée (UPEMLV))
    Abstract: In France, policies that aim at reducing labour cost have extended to more and more workers since the beginning of the 90s. Evaluations of the effect of payroll tax reduction often use estimations of labour demand equations. In this paper, we consider the impact of labour tax cuts on job creations and destructions through the Fillon reform (2003), by using a fixed effect instrumental variable approach and a sectora l pseudo panel dataset. Over 2002-2005, our estimates show that PTR let job flows unchanged.
    Date: 2013
  10. By: Zuzana Siebertova (Council for Budget Responsibility); Norbert Svarda (Council for Budget Responsibility); Jana Valachyova (Council for Budget Responsibility)
    Abstract: This paper sets out in detail a microsimulation model of the Slovak tax and transfer system that builds on the existing EUROMOD platform. The objective is to give an overview of the development process, and to discuss differences relative to EUROMOD. In a validation exercise, we demonstrate that refinements to the current version of the EUROMOD can improve the match between simulated output, underlying data and official statistics. It is concluded that the model is a valid tool to conduct tax and benefit simulation exercises in the context of Slovakia.
    Keywords: microsimulation, EUROMOD, tax and benefit policy,Slovakia
    JEL: C81 I38 H24
    Date: 2014–06

This nep-pub issue is ©2014 by Kwang Soo Cheong. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.