nep-ppm New Economics Papers
on Project, Program and Portfolio Management
Issue of 2013‒11‒09
five papers chosen by
Arvi Kuura
Parnu College - Tartu University

  1. Governance Mode Choice in Collaborative PhD Projects By Negin Salimi; Rudi Bekkers; Koen Frenken
  2. Using Critical Path Analysis (CPA) in Place Marketing process By Metaxas, Theodore; Deffner, Alex
  3. The influence of ethnicity and culture on the valuation of environmental improvements: Results from a CVM study in Southwest China By Ahlheim, Michael; Börger, Tobias; Frör, Oliver
  4. Corporate taxation and the quality of research & development By Christoph Ernst; Katharina Richter; Nadine Riedel
  5. Long-Term Science and Technology Policy – Russian priorities for 2030 By Alexander Sokolov; Alexander Chulok; Vladimir Mesropyan

  1. By: Negin Salimi; Rudi Bekkers; Koen Frenken
    Abstract: Joint PhD projects are a promising form of research collaboration, connecting universities to firms and public research organizations. Entering into such collaborations, however, requires decisions in terms of governance. This paper investigates how a university and its partners govern such projects, including decision-making, daily management and disclosure policies. Earlier studies show that shared governance modes have had a higher success rate than centralized governance modes. Nevertheless, more than two thirds of the 191 joint PhD projects we investigated opted for centralized rather than shared governance. Our findings show that: (i) geographical and cognitive distance render the adoption of a shared governance mode less likely; (ii) the partner controlling critical resources tends to centralize governance, and (iii) partnering firms are more likely to put restrictions on publication output than public research organizations. We therefore recommend that universities and their partners take these aspects into account when selecting such projects.
    Keywords: university-industry collaboration, collaborative PhD project, shared governance, centralized governance, proximity, resource imbalances, publication disclosure.
    Date: 2013–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:tuecis:wpaper:1309&r=ppm
  2. By: Metaxas, Theodore; Deffner, Alex
    Abstract: The article awards the use of CPA as a methodological tool in Place Marketing implementation. Taking into account that Place Marketing is a strategic process based on ‘project’ meaning with particular actions in specific time horizon, the article proposed that CPΑ has the capacity to satisfy this hypothesis. For this reason, the article creates a hypothetical scenario of CPA in four phases, planning, programming, implementation and feedback, taking as a case study the city of Rostock in Germany. The analysis shows that CPA is an important tool for Place Marketing since Place Marketing implementation receives the character of ‘project’ in particular time horizon.
    Keywords: Place Marketing, CPA, project, hypothetical scenario, Rostock
    JEL: O18 O2 O22 R50 R58
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:51231&r=ppm
  3. By: Ahlheim, Michael; Börger, Tobias; Frör, Oliver
    Abstract: The provision of environmental goods by government creates social benefits which might vary between citizen groups with different cultural and ethnic backgrounds. These differences as well as the overall extent of benefits should be analysed before the implementation of public projects in order to consider not only the efficiency aspects of such a project but also its distributional effects. In Southwest China we are facing a rapid deforestation for the development of rubber cultivation and at the same time find an ethnically highly diverse population. This Contingent Valuation study tries to assess the short-term and long-term benefits accruing from a public reforestation programme in Xishuangbanna and their distribution among different ethnic groups living in that region. The results show that different ethnic groups value short-term and future benefits of reforestation differently and that these differences can be explained by the different cultural and historical backgrounds of these ethnic groups. --
    Keywords: Rubber cultivation,contingent valuation method,environmental costs,ethnicities,equity,cultural ecosystem services,China
    JEL: D31 D33 E6 E25
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:fziddp:812013&r=ppm
  4. By: Christoph Ernst (ZEW Mannheim); Katharina Richter (University of Mannheim & ZEW Mannheim); Nadine Riedel (University of Hohenheim, Oxford University CBT & CESifo Munich)
    Abstract: This paper examines the impact of tax incentives on corporate research and development (R&D) activity. Traditionally, R&D tax incentives have been provided in the form of special tax allowances and tax credits. In recent years, several countries moreover reduced their income tax rates on R&D output. Previous papers have shown that all three tax instruments are effective in raising the quantity of R&D related activity. We provide evidence that, beyond this quantity effect, corporate taxation also distorts the quality of R&D projects, i.e. their innovativeness and revenue potential. Using rich data on corporate patent applications to the European patent office, we find that a low tax rate on patent income is instrumental in attracting innovative projects with a high earnings potentialand innovation level. The effect is statistically significant and economically relevant and prevails in a number of sensitivity checks. R&D tax credits and tax allowances are in turn not found to exert a statistically significant impact on project quality.
    Keywords: corporate taxation, research and development, micro data
    JEL: H3 H7 J5
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:btx:wpaper:1301&r=ppm
  5. By: Alexander Sokolov (Director of the international Foresight centre, vice director of the ISSEK HSE. Address: National research university “Higher school of economics”); Alexander Chulok (Head of the science and technology Foresight department, ISSEK HSE. Address: National research university “Higher school of economics”); Vladimir Mesropyan (Researcher at the science and technology Foresight department, ISSEK HSE. Address: National research university “Higher school of economics”)
    Abstract: Currently the framework conditions for science and technology and innovation (STI) policy have changed significantly in Russia: a system of technology forecasting has been established, which focuses on ensuring the future needs of the manufacturing sector of the national economy. This system was supposed to be the main part of the state strategy planning system which is currently being formed. Over the last decade dozens of science and technology forward-looking projects have been implemented, among which 3 cycles of long-term S&T Foresight stand out prominently. The Foresight was developed by the request of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation. The development of the 3rd cycle of long-term Foresight includes both normative («market pull») and research («technology push») approaches. The project involved more than 2,000 experts and more than 200 organizations. Within the project a network of six sectoral Foresight centers was created on the basis of leading universities. The article describes the most important issues of future studies in Russia and presents the principles which formed the basis for the long-term science and technology (S&T) Foresight until 2030. The authors explore its position in the national technology Foresight system and the possibilities for the implementation of its results by the key stakeholders of the national innovation system and on the level of STI policy. Eventually Russian experience could be fairly interesting and useful for many other countries with similar socio-economic features and barriers
    Keywords: Foresight, Russia, research and development strategy, planning of science and technology development, Russian technology Foresight system, innovation policy.
    JEL: O31 O32 O33 O38 O21 O25 O43
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hig:wpaper:19sti2013&r=ppm

This nep-ppm issue is ©2013 by Arvi Kuura. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.