nep-ppm New Economics Papers
on Project and Portfolio Management
Issue of 2006‒11‒25
four papers chosen by
Arvi Kuura
Parnu College - Tartu University

  1. Methods for Assessing Technology Transfer - An Overview By Görling, Stefan
  2. A Cost-Benefit Analysis of an Olympic Games By Darren McHugh
  3. The Aggregate Labor Market Effects of the Swedish Knowledge Lift Program By James Albrecht; Gerard J. van den Berg; Susan Vroman
  4. The Incidence and Effectiveness of Prior Actions in IMF-Supported Programs By Uma Ramakrishnan; Alun H. Thomas

  1. By: Görling, Stefan
    Abstract: As triple-helix like research funding is growing in popularity, the need for evaluating the success of such programs is growing. During the last 30 years, a number of attempts have been made to assess whether certain technology funding has been successful or not. The purpose of this paper is to present an overview of these attempts as well as suggest that we must look beyond simple valuemeters as patent creation rate in order to fully understand the process of technology transfer.
    Keywords: technology transfer, assessment, patent, innovation management
    Date: 2006–11–15
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhb:pinkwp:31&r=ppm
  2. By: Darren McHugh
    Abstract: This paper attempts to estimate the net benefit to Canada of the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympic Games. Two particular classes of problems in Olympic CBA are studied in detail. The first is the unique nature of project dependency in an Olympic Games, and this is surmounted by the classification of Olympic-related costs and benefits as "Event-related" or "Infrastructure-related", with rules for handing each in the context of a CBA for an Olympic Games. The second is the estimation of net benefit of three types of "Olympic Outputs", namely the Olympic Spectacle, the Olympic Halo (the feelings of pride engendered in the residents of the host city), and the tourism induced by an Olympic Games. One key result of the paper is that a correct accounting of induced Olympic tourism shows that the net benefit of this tourism is substantially less than its widely touted 'economic impact'. Although a detailed estimation of infrastructure costs and benefits is outside the scope of the paper, their contribution to the net benefit of the Games under the proposed project accounting rules is clearly negative. The net benefit of the Olympic Games is therefore also substantially negative when the estimates of Olympic benefits from this paper are combined with published estimates for event costs.
    Keywords: Cost/Benefit Analysis, Olympics, Tourism
    JEL: D61
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:qed:wpaper:1097&r=ppm
  3. By: James Albrecht (Georgetown University, IFAU Uppsala, CESifo and IZA Bonn); Gerard J. van den Berg (Free University Amsterdam, IFAU Uppsala, CEPR, IFS and IZA Bonn); Susan Vroman (Georgetown University, IFAU Uppsala, CESifo and IZA Bonn)
    Abstract: The Swedish adult education program known as the Knowledge Lift (1997-2002) was unprecedented in its size and scope, aiming to raise the skill level of large numbers of lowskill workers. This paper evaluates the potential effects of this program on aggregate labor market outcomes. This is done by calibrating an equilibrium search model with heterogeneous worker skills using pre-program data and then forecasting the program impacts. We compare the forecasts to observed aggregate labor market outcomes after termination of the program.
    Keywords: job search, returns to education, program evaluation, wages, unemployment, Swedish labor market, calibration
    JEL: J21 J64 J31 J24 I21 C31
    Date: 2006–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2385&r=ppm
  4. By: Uma Ramakrishnan; Alun H. Thomas
    Abstract: Prior actions are measures that need to be implemented prior to Board approval of an IMFsupported program. This paper examines whether such prior actions can signal a willingness to implement reforms, especially when the member's track record is weak. We find some support for this signaling role, particularly for programs supported by the General Resources Account (GRA). Controlling for the member's previous track record, prior actions are associated with greater compliance with other structural conditions, suggesting their possible use as a screening device. Moreover, prior actions set at program approval serve as a useful screening device and strengthen the macroeconomic targets set out in the IMF-supported program. The results also reveal a demonstrable screening effect on growth over the medium term, since the growth impact of the ratio of prior actions at the outset versus the rest of the program is significantly positive while the total number of prior actions is not statistically significant.
    Keywords: Conditionality , prior actions , signaling , commitment , implementation ,
    Date: 2006–10–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:imf:imfwpa:06/213&r=ppm

This nep-ppm issue is ©2006 by Arvi Kuura. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.