nep-pke New Economics Papers
on Post Keynesian Economics
Issue of 2024‒10‒21
five papers chosen by
Karl Petrick


  1. The political economy of structural transformation in African cities: Insights from the Deals and Development framework By Kunal Sen
  2. Gender Homogeneity in Philosophy and Methodology of Economics: Evidence from Publication Patterns By Truc, Alexandre; Claveau, François; Herfeld, Catherine; Larivière, Vincent
  3. What They Don't Teach You about Artificial Intelligence at Business School: Stagnation, Oil, and War By Naudé, Wim
  4. The benefits of considering gender in economic development By Ganguly, Sujata; Nikolova, Elena
  5. Online education: for a more inclusive and less unequal future By Gijón, Covadonga; Fernández-Bonilla, Fernando; Ruiz-Rua, Aurora; Martínez-de-Ibarreta, Carlos

  1. By: Kunal Sen
    Abstract: An important stylized fact about African economic development is the phenomenon of urbanization without structural transformation. This paper provides a political economy analysis of the lack of structural transformation in African cities, drawing on the Deals and Development framework.
    Keywords: Structural transformation, Deals & Development, Political economy, Africa, Urbanization
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:unu:wpaper:wp-2024-50
  2. By: Truc, Alexandre; Claveau, François; Herfeld, Catherine; Larivière, Vincent
    Abstract: This study examines gender diversity among authors in philosophy and methodology of economics, comparing it to the disciplines of economics and philosophy. Using bibliometric methods, we find that philosophy and methodology of economics, as an interdisciplinary field, consistently had a lower share of women authors than its parent disciplines, which are the two social sciences and humanities disciplines that are the furthest from gender parity. Although homogeneity compounding generally characterizes the whole field of philosophy and methodology of economics, one small and temporary subfield, making contributions to heterodox economics, structural realism, and the discussion on pluralism in economics, constituted a pocket of gender diversity. Alongside a more general discussion of possible reasons behind the striking gender imbalance in the field, we also elaborate on possible reasons for the limited size and duration of this pocket of diversity.
    Date: 2024–09–18
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:osf:socarx:ck6s9
  3. By: Naudé, Wim (RWTH Aachen University)
    Abstract: This paper discusses four dimensions of the economics of AI that are neglected in business school and university teaching and research. First, students are not being taught that there is no 4th Industrial Revolution; on the contrary, the narrative of the inevitability and wonders of the 4IR is a vital staple of the curricula. Second, students are rarely told that we do not live in a technologically disruptive era; on the contrary, the mantra of "disrupt or else be disrupted" in a world of ceaseless innovation is drummed into students. Third, little is discussed about AI's scaling problem - it faces ecological constraints due to being an energy and water guzzler. Fourthly, business schools largely fail to create awareness that AI has essentially become a project of platform capitalism (techfeudalism) and that the last extraction zone it is being applied to is the Military Industrial Complex (MIC), in furtherance of the Permanent War Economy. Implications for AI governance and business school teaching and research are drawn from this big picture.
    Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, capitalism, economic growth, climate change, war
    JEL: P18 P17 N40 Q55 O33
    Date: 2024–09
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17306
  4. By: Ganguly, Sujata; Nikolova, Elena
    Abstract: This chapter argues that gender equality and economic development are tightly intertwined, and that gender aspects should be an essential consideration for economic development. The chapter starts by developing a conceptual framework explaining how gender equality and economic development influence each other. In particular, the framework emphasizes the interaction between SDG 5 (gender equality), SDG 3 (good health and well-being) and SDG 4 (quality education). It then applies the developed framework to discuss how gender affects economic development in four broad domains with reference to the green economy. First, the chapter discusses the links between gender and economic development in employment and social protection, followed by unpaid work and the care economy. Second, the chapter discusses how we can bridge the gap between the green economy and gender inequality. Finally, the chapter points out that the post-COVID-19 recovery can be exploited as a window of opportunity to initiate a development model that encompasses gender inclusiveness and the green economy. The chapter concludes with recommendations for gender-sensitive programmes and policies that can be used by governments to fast-track economic development and growth, and to build inclusive and resilient societies.
    Keywords: Green economy, Gender equality, Economic development, Employment, Social protection, Unpaid work, Care economy, COVID-19
    JEL: J16 O12 O13
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:glodps:1497
  5. By: Gijón, Covadonga; Fernández-Bonilla, Fernando; Ruiz-Rua, Aurora; Martínez-de-Ibarreta, Carlos
    Abstract: This paper examines the impact of online education on inclusivity and accessibility, focusing on undergraduate education. It explores how digital platforms address diverse learning needs and promote educational equity, particularly for students with disabilities. While online education offers personalized learning and enhanced engagement, it also highlights challenges such as digital literacy and access to reliable internet. The study addresses the digital divide, which disproportionately affects students from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, rural areas, and those with disabilities. The paper emphasizes the importance of policy interventions, institutional support, and the adoption of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) to create inclusive educational environments. It concludes by identifying gaps in empirical data and calling for further research to develop comprehensive approaches for equitable e-learning.
    Keywords: Online education, Digital divide, Inequality, e-learning, disabilities, higher education, Survey data, Econometric models
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:itsb24:302529

This nep-pke issue is ©2024 by Karl Petrick. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.