nep-pke New Economics Papers
on Post Keynesian Economics
Issue of 2010‒09‒03
three papers chosen by
Karl Petrick
University of the West Indies

  1. Capital Regulation after the Crisis: Business as Usual? By Martin Hellwig
  2. Veblen’s Theory of the Leisure Class Revisited: Implications for Optimal Income Taxation By Aronsson, Thomas; Johansson-Stenman, Olof
  3. The hemline and the economy: is there any match? By Baardwijk, M. van; Franses, Ph.H.B.F.

  1. By: Martin Hellwig (Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Bonn)
    Abstract: The paper discusses the reform of capital regulation of banks in the wake of the financial crisis of 2007/2009. Whereas the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision seems to go for marginal changes here and there, the paper calls for a thorough overhaul, moving away from risk calibration and raising capital requirements very substantially. The argument is based on the observation that the current system of risk-calibrated capital requirements, in particular under the model-based approach, played a key role in allowing banks to be undercapitalized prior to the crisis, with strong systemic effects for deleveraging multipliers and for the functioning of interbank markets. The argument is also based on the observation that the current system has no theoretical foundation, its objectives are ill-specified, and its effects have not been thought through, either for the individual bank or for the system as a whole. Objections to substantial increases in capital requirements rest on arguments that run counter to economic logic or are themselves evidence of moral hazard and a need for regulation.
    Keywords: financial crisis, Basel Accord, banking regulation, capital requirements, modelbased approach, systemic risk
    JEL: G21 G28
    Date: 2010–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:mpg:wpaper:2010_31&r=pke
  2. By: Aronsson, Thomas (Department of Economics, Umeå University); Johansson-Stenman, Olof (Department of Economics)
    Abstract: Almost all previous studies on public policy under relative consumption concerns have ignored the role of leisure for status comparisons. Inspired by Veblen (1899), this paper considers a two-type optimal income tax model, where people care about their relative consumption, and where the importance of relative consumption increases with the use of leisure due to increased consumption visibility. We show that increased consumption positionality typically implies higher marginal income tax rates for both ability-types. Using a leisure-weighted measure of reference consumption, rather than a measure where leisure plays no role as in the previous literature, increases the marginal income tax rate implemented for the low-ability type and decreases the marginal income tax rate implemented for the high-ability type, i.e., it gives rise to a regressive tax component.
    Keywords: optimal taxation; redistribution; public goods; relative consumption; status; positional goods
    JEL: D62 H21 H23 H41
    Date: 2010–08–25
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:umnees:0812&r=pke
  3. By: Baardwijk, M. van; Franses, Ph.H.B.F.
    Abstract: Urban legend has it that the hemline is correlated with the economy. In times of decline, the hemline moves towards the floor (decreases), and when the economy is booming, skirts get shorter and the hemline increases. We collected monthly data on the hemline, for 1921-2009, and evaluate these against the NBER chronology of the economic cycle. The main finding is that the urban legend holds true but with a time lag of about three years. Hence, the current economic crisis predicts ankle length shirts around 2011 and 2012.
    Date: 2010–07–28
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:eureir:1765020147&r=pke

This nep-pke issue is ©2010 by Karl Petrick. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.