nep-pke New Economics Papers
on Post Keynesian Economics
Issue of 2009‒01‒10
two papers chosen by
Karl Petrick
University of the West Indies

  1. Development of What? An Exposition of the Politics of Development Economics By Arup Maharatna
  2. The continuing foreclosure crisis: new institutions and risks By Tatom, John

  1. By: Arup Maharatna
    Abstract: The present paper aims at driving home a hitherto-neglected and perhaps often muted (but important) point, namely, that the confusions and identity crisis that had gripped development economics in the 1980s. This was mainly due to its perennial vulnerability, unlike other branches of economics, to the ideological stakes over the cold war at the global level.
    Keywords: neoclassical, government, academic, theoretical, liberalist, development economics, politics, political, capitalist, socialist, history,
    Date: 2008
  2. By: Tatom, John
    Abstract: The Federal Reserve (Fed) and the U.S. Treasury have taken unprecedented steps to stem the financial crisis that began in August 2007 as part of the extended foreclosure crisis. In the most recent episode in September 2008, seven financial institutions either failed or were merged with stronger firms, sparking public concerns for their assets and for their own financial institutions. This has led to several new institutional arrangements of questionable value, foremost among them, the Bush Administration’s $700 billion bailout fund for illiquid mortgage-related assets on the books of financial institutions. All of these events had been anticipated for months, but the surprise was the bunching of these failures over such a short interval. The other noteworthy feature of these developments is the speed and completeness with which the private sector moved in to acquire the assets and operations of these companies with little or no regulatory or taxpayer cost. There are exceptions, but even in those cases, the costs were minimized and the firms involved hardly missed a beat, except for their new owners. This paper reviews arguments that the failure of Lehman precipitated recent developments and also whether financial deregulation was responsible. A Lehman-related development was the run on money market mutual funds and policy responses to it by both the Fed and Treasury. These are critically reviewed here as well. Finally, it reviews how rapidly and effectively the Fed responded to the September issues, something that Treasury bailouts cannot do, and that represents a major turning point in the Fed response to the foreclosure/financial crisis.
    Keywords: central banking policy; credit approach to monetary policy; sterilization; systemic risk
    JEL: E58 E52 E44
    Date: 2008–09–30

This nep-pke issue is ©2009 by Karl Petrick. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.