Abstract: |
In order to rank universities, rather than aggregating the indicators used by
the Times Higher Education Supplement (THES) - using weightings which, though
reasonable, are at the same time arbitrary and inflexible - one can compare
universities in termes of dominance and hence deduce various partial or
complete rankings. The resultant dominance ranking method is presented in this
note. Data are recalled in Appendix 1. Appendix provides full details of the
dominance analysis for each university. From this analysis two listings are
derived : (i) a front runners list consisting of 34 Ônon-dominatedÕ
universities (Table 4) and (ii) a (new) ranking of the 200 universities
surveyed by the THES, based on their respective Ôactive-passive dominanceÕ
scores (Table 5). Concluding remarks bear on limits of the data and of the
exercise. |