nep-nud New Economics Papers
on Nudge and Boosting
Issue of 2026–03–23
two papers chosen by
Marco Novarese, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale


  1. When Incentives Aren't Enough: Evidence on Inattention and Imperfect Memory from HIV Medication Adherence By Hang Yu; Jared Stolove; Dean Yang; James Riddell IV; Arlete Mahumane
  2. Nudging farmers toward disease-free shrimp technology with financial incentives: Experimental evidence from Bangladesh By Bin Khaled, Muhammad Nahian; Maredia, Mywish K.; Narayanan, Sudha; Belton, Ben; Kabir, Razin

  1. By: Hang Yu; Jared Stolove; Dean Yang; James Riddell IV; Arlete Mahumane
    Abstract: Financial incentives are widely used to encourage beneficial behaviors, but their effectiveness may be limited by inattention and imperfect memory. We study this in a randomized trial of HIV medication adherence in Mozambique. Financial incentives alone increase adherence by 10.6 percentage points, while pairing incentives with reminders increases adherence by 24.3 percentage points. We develop a model in which inattention to daily adherence and imperfect memory of payment eligibility reduce incentive effectiveness and show that reminders mitigate both frictions. Detailed medication refill data support the model’s predictions. The results suggest combining incentives with reminders can substantially increase program effectiveness.
    JEL: D91 I12 O15
    Date: 2026–03
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:34917
  2. By: Bin Khaled, Muhammad Nahian; Maredia, Mywish K.; Narayanan, Sudha; Belton, Ben; Kabir, Razin
    Abstract: Price discounts are a common policy tool to promote agricultural technology adoption in low-income settings, yet their effectiveness may be limited when farmers face uncertainty or have access to familiar alternatives. We test this through a randomized controlled trial with shrimp farmers in southwestern coastal Bangladesh, a region highly exposed to climate shocks. The government promotes Specific Pathogen Free (SPF) post-larvae (PL)—certified as disease-free—to reduce high mortality in shrimp farming. Farmers were randomly offered varying discount levels for two SPF-PL types, differing in size uniformity and market price (proxies for quality), with the highest discount reducing their prices to parity with conventional non-SPF PL. We find no significant effect of discounts on adoption of the lower-priced Mid-grade SPF-PL, characterized by less size uniformity. In contrast, discounts significantly increased adoption of the higher-priced, more uniform Premium-grade SPF-PL, raising uptake by 10–19 percentage points among active shrimp farmers. Larger discounts did not yield higher adoption than smaller ones, indicating diminishing returns to discount generosity. Heterogeneity analyses reveal behavioral and contextual mechanisms: prior exposure to Mid-grade SPF-PL reduced its subsequent adoption but increased responsiveness to Premium-grade, consistent with experience effects and reference dependence. Cyclone exposure dampened treatment responses, suggesting capital constraints, while infrastructure preparedness (e.g., nursing facilities) enhanced uptake. These findings underscore that in high-risk agricultural systems, price incentives alone may not drive adoption unless the promoted input is perceived as effective. Successful promotion strategies must integrate quality assurance with attention to farmer experience, behavioral biases, and vulnerability to shocks.
    Keywords: farmers; shellfish diseases; financial policies; shrimp culture; pond culture; supply chains; Bangladesh; Asia; Southern Asia
    Date: 2025–12–11
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fpr:ifprwp:178761

This nep-nud issue is ©2026 by Marco Novarese. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the Griffith Business School of Griffith University in Australia.