nep-neu New Economics Papers
on Neuroeconomics
Issue of 2024–12–02
five papers chosen by
Daniel Houser, George Mason University


  1. Child Penalties in Labour Market Skills By Jessen, Jonas; Kinne, Lavinia; Battisti, Michele
  2. The Value of Early-Career Skills By Simon Wiederhold; Christina Langer
  3. Skills and Earnings: A Multidimensional Perspective on Human Capital By Woessmann, Ludger
  4. Mitigating cognitive bias to improve organizational decisions: an integrative review, framework, and research agenda By Fasolo, Barbara; Heard, Claire; Scopelliti, Irene
  5. The Complexity of Economic Decisions By Xavier Gabaix; Thomas Graeber

  1. By: Jessen, Jonas (WZB - Social Science Research Center Berlin); Kinne, Lavinia (DIW Berlin); Battisti, Michele (University of Glasgow)
    Abstract: Child penalties in labour market outcomes are well- documented: after childbirth, mothers' employment and earnings drop persistently compared to fathers. In addition to gender norms, a potential driver could be the loss in labour market skills due to mothers' longer employment interruptions. This paper estimates child penalties in adult cognitive skills by adapting the pseudo-panel approach to a single cross-section of 29 countries in the PIAAC dataset. We find a persistent drop in numeracy skills after childbirth for both parents between 0.13 (short-run) and 0.16 standard deviations (long-run), but no statistically significant difference between mothers and fathers. Estimates of child penalties in skills strongly depend on controlling for pre-determined characteristics, especially education. Additionally, there is no evidence for worse occupational skill matches for mothers after childbirth. Our findings suggest that changes in general labour market skills cannot explain child penalties in labour market outcomes, and that a cross-sectional estimation of child penalties can be sensitive to characteristics of the outcome variable.
    Keywords: child penalty, cognitive skills, gender inequality, PIAAC
    JEL: I20 J13 J16 J24
    Date: 2024–10
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp17379
  2. By: Simon Wiederhold; Christina Langer
    Abstract: We develop novel measures of early-career skills that are more detailed, comprehensive, and labor-market-relevant than existing skill proxies. We exploit that skill requirements of apprenticeships in Germany are codified in state-approved, nationally standardized apprenticeship plans. These plans provide more than 13, 000 different skills and the exact duration of learning each skill. Following workers over their careers in administrative data, we find that cognitive, social, and digital skills acquired during apprenticeship are highly – yet differently – rewarded. We also document rising returns to digital and social skills since the 1990s, with a more moderate increase in returns to cognitive skills.
    Keywords: returns to skills, apprenticeship plans, labor market, earnings, early-career skills
    JEL: I21 I26 J24
    Date: 2023–02
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:glh:wpfacu:204
  3. By: Woessmann, Ludger (University of Munich, ifo Institute; Hoover Institution, Stanford University; CESifo; IZA)
    Abstract: The multitude of tasks performed in the labor market requires skills in many dimensions. Traditionally, human capital has been proxied primarily by educational attainment. However, an expanding body of literature highlights the importance of various skill dimensions for success in the labor market. This paper examines the returns to cognitive, personality, and social skills as three important dimensions of basic skills. Recent advances in text analysis of online job postings and professional networking platforms offer novel methods for assessing a wider range of applied skill dimensions and their labor market relevance. A synthesis and integration of the evidence on the relationship between multidimensional skills and earnings, including the matching of skill supply and demand, will enhance our understanding of the role of human capital in the labor market.
    Keywords: skills, human capital, education, labor market, earnings, tasks, cognitive skills, personality, social skills, multidimensional skills JEL Classification: J24, I26
    Date: 2024
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cge:wacage:730
  4. By: Fasolo, Barbara; Heard, Claire; Scopelliti, Irene
    Abstract: The detrimental influence of cognitive biases on decision-making and organizational performance is well established in management research. However, less attention has been given to bias mitigation interventions for improving organizational decisions. Drawing from the judgment and decision-making (JDM) literature, this paper offers a clear conceptualization of two approaches that mitigate bias via distinct cognitive mechanisms—debiasing and choice architecture—and presents a comprehensive integrative review of interventions tested experimentally within each approach. Observing a lack of comparative studies, we propose a novel framework that lays the foundation for future empirical research in bias mitigation. This framework identifies decision, organizational, and individual-level factors that are proposed to moderate the effectiveness of bias mitigation approaches across different contexts and can guide organizations in selecting the most suitable approach. By bridging JDM and management research, we offer a comprehensive research agenda and guidelines to select the most suitable evidence-based approach for improving decision making processes and, ultimately, organizational performance.
    Keywords: cognitive biases; bias migration; organizational decision-making; debiasing; choice architecture; dual interventions; training; decision-making process; managerial cognition; judgment and decision-making
    JEL: J50
    Date: 2024–10–22
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ehl:lserod:125404
  5. By: Xavier Gabaix; Thomas Graeber
    Abstract: We propose a theory of the complexity of economic decisions. Leveraging a macroeconomic framework of production functions, we conceptualize the mind as a cognitive economy, where a task's complexity is determined by its composition of cognitive operations. Complexity emerges as the inverse of the total factor productivity of thinking about a task. It increases in the number of importance-weighted components and decreases in the degree to which the effect of one or few components on the optimal action dominates. Higher complexity generates larger decision errors and behavioral attenuation to variation in problem parameters. The model applies both to continuous and discrete choice. We develop a theory-guided experimental methodology for measuring subjective perceptions of complexity that is simple and portable. A series of experiments test and confirm the central predictions of our model for perceptions of complexity, behavioral attenuation, and decision errors. We provide a template for applying the framework to core economic decision domains, and then develop several applications including the complexity of static consumption choice with one or several interacting goods, consumption over time, the tax system, forecasting, and discrete choice between goods.
    JEL: C91 D03 D11 D14 D90 E03
    Date: 2024–11
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:33109

This nep-neu issue is ©2024 by Daniel Houser. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.