New Economics Papers
on Neuroeconomics
Issue of 2013‒06‒30
two papers chosen by



  1. Retirement and Cognitive Development: Are the Retired Really Inactive? By DE GRIP Andries; DUPUY Arnaud; JOLLES Jelle; VAN BOXTEL Martin
  2. Reflections on the Search for Fertility Effects on Happiness By Kravdal, Øystein

  1. By: DE GRIP Andries; DUPUY Arnaud; JOLLES Jelle; VAN BOXTEL Martin
    Abstract: This paper uses longitudinal test data to analyze the relation between retirement and cognitive development. Controlling for individual fixed effects and lagged cognition, we find that retirees face greater declines in information processing speed than those who remain employed. However, remarkably, their cognitive flexibility declines less, an effect that appears to be persistent 6 years after retirement. Both effects of retirement on cognitive development are comparable to the effect of a five to six-year age difference. Controlling for changes in blood pressure, which are negatively related to cognitive flexibility, we still find lower declines in cognitive flexibility for retirees. Since the decline in information processing speed after retirement holds particularly for the low educated, activating these persons after retirement could lower the social costs of an aging society.
    Keywords: Cognitive decline; Labor market activity; Retirement
    JEL: J24 J26
    Date: 2013–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:irs:cepswp:2013-11&r=neu
  2. By: Kravdal, Øystein (Dept. of Economics, University of Oslo)
    Abstract: There have been many studies of how the number of children in a family affects the parents’ or the children’s lives. One strand of this research focuses on the implications of fertility for the parents’ level of self-reported well-being or happiness. It is argued in this paper that an overall “happiness effect” is not very informative because of the presumably large variation in individuals’ perceived gains from having children. Furthermore, it is explained that such an effect would be difficult to estimate. Most importantly, the highly varying ideas about how a child will affect life quality are important for the decision about whether to have a child. Many of those who have few or no children have chosen this because they think their life will be best this way, and their happiness therefore tells us little about how happy their more fertile counterparts - who to a large extent have other preferences – would have been if they had few or no children. This estimation problem that arises because expectations about the effects of a certain behaviour (here childbearing) are heterogenous, and also affect that very behaviour, is acknowledged in the economics literature, but there is little consciousness about it in the fertility-happiness research. In addition, there is a more “standard” selection problem: factors with implications for childbearing desires, or for the chance of fulfilling these, may also affect or be linked to happiness for other reasons. Unfortunately, even the most advanced statistical approaches that have been used in this research area fail to handle all these problems, so reported results should be interpreted very cautiously.
    Keywords: fertility; happiness; effect heterogeneity; mehod; selection; subjective well-being
    JEL: J13
    Date: 2013–05–21
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:osloec:2013_010&r=neu

General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.