New Economics Papers
on Neuroeconomics
Issue of 2007‒06‒23
one paper chosen by
Daniela Raeva


  1. On Punishment and Well-being By Jordi Brandts; María Fernanda Rivas

  1. By: Jordi Brandts; María Fernanda Rivas
    Abstract: The existence of punishment opportunities has been shown to cause efficiency in public goods experiments to increase considerably. In this paper we ask whether punishment also has a downside in terms of process dissatisfaction. We conduct an experiment to study the conjecture that an environment with stronger punishment possibilities leads to higher material but lower subjective well-being. The more general motivation for our study stems from the notion that people??s subjective well-being may be affected by the institutional environment they find themselves in. Our findings show that harsher punishment possibilities lead to signficantly higher well-being, controlling for earnings and other relevant variables. People derive independent satisfaction from interacting under the protection of strong punishment possibilities. These results complement the evidence on the neural basis of altruistic punishment reported in de Quervain et al. (2004).
    Keywords: Public Goods, Experiments, Well-being, Punishment
    JEL: C92 D60 H40
    Date: 2007–06–15
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:aub:autbar:705.07&r=neu

This issue is ©2007 by Daniela Raeva. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.