nep-net New Economics Papers
on Network Economics
Issue of 2016‒05‒08
five papers chosen by
Yi-Nung Yang
Chung Yuan Christian University

  1. Not too close, not too far: testing the Goldilocks principle of ‘optimal’ distance in innovation networks By Rune Dahl Fitjar; Franz Huber; Andrés Rodríguez-Pose
  2. Two-sided heterogeneity and Trade By Andrew B. Bernard; Andreas Moxnes; Karen Helene Ulltveit-Moe
  3. Evaluating Systemic Risk using Bank Default Probabilities in Financial Networks By Sergio Rubens Stancato de Souza; Thiago Christiano Silva; Benjamin Miranda Tabak; Solange Maria Guerra
  4. Innovating rural resources governance through new policy instruments: the case of “network contracts” By Secco, Laura; Abatangelo, Chiara; Pisani, Elena; Gallo, Diego; Pettenella, Davide; Gatto, Paola; Dare, Riccardo; Vidale, Enrico
  5. Effects of social networks on technical efficiency in smallholder agriculture: The case of cereal producers Tanzania By Muange, Elijah N.; Godecke, Theda; Schwarze, Stefan

  1. By: Rune Dahl Fitjar; Franz Huber; Andrés Rodríguez-Pose
    Abstract: This paper analyses how the formation of collaboration networks affects firm-level innovation by applying the ‘Goldilocks principle’. The ‘Goldilocks principle’ of optimal distance in innovation networks postulates that the best firm-level innovation results are achieved when the partners involved in the network are located at the ‘right’ distance, i.e. ‘not too close and not too far’ from one another, across non-geographical proximity dimensions. This principle is tested on a survey of 542 Norwegian firms conducted in 2013, containing information about firm-level innovation activities and key innovation partners. The results of the ordinal logit regression analysis substantiate the Goldilocks principle, as the most innovative firms are found amongst those that collaborate with partners at medium levels of proximity for all non-geographical dimensions. The analysis also underscores the importance of the presence of a substitution-innovation mechanism, with geographical distance problems being compensated by proximity in other dimensions as a driver of innovation, whilst there is no support for a potential overlap-innovation mechanism.
    Keywords: Proximities, innovation, networks, collaboration, Goldilocks principle, Norway
    JEL: O31 O33 D85
    Date: 2016–05
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:egu:wpaper:1609&r=net
  2. By: Andrew B. Bernard; Andreas Moxnes; Karen Helene Ulltveit-Moe
    Abstract: This paper develops a multi-country model of international trade that provides a simple micro-foundation for buyer-seller relationships in trade. We explore a rich dataset that identifies buyers and sellers in trade and establish a set of basic facts that guide the development of the theoretical model. We use predictions of the model to examine the role of buyer heterogeneity in a market for firm-level adjustments to trade shocks, as well as to quantitatively evaluate how firms' marginal costs depend on access to suppliers in foreign markets.
    Keywords: Heterogeneous firms, exporters, importers, sourcing costs, trade elasticity
    JEL: F10 F12 F14
    Date: 2016–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cep:cepdps:dp1426&r=net
  3. By: Sergio Rubens Stancato de Souza; Thiago Christiano Silva; Benjamin Miranda Tabak; Solange Maria Guerra
    Abstract: In this paper, we propose a novel methodology to measure systemic risk in networks composed of financial institutions. Our procedure combines the impact effects obtained from stress measures that rely on feedback centrality properties with default probabilities of institutions. We also present new heuristics for designing feasible and relevant stress-testing scenarios that can subside regulators in financial system surveillance tasks. We develop a methodology to extract banking communities and show that these communities are mostly composed of non-large banks and have a relevant effect on systemic risk. This finding renders these communities objects of interest for supervisory activities besides SIFIs and large banks. Finally, our results provide insights and guidelines that can be useful for policymaking
    Date: 2016–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bcb:wpaper:426&r=net
  4. By: Secco, Laura; Abatangelo, Chiara; Pisani, Elena; Gallo, Diego; Pettenella, Davide; Gatto, Paola; Dare, Riccardo; Vidale, Enrico
    Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy,
    Date: 2015–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:aiea15:207845&r=net
  5. By: Muange, Elijah N.; Godecke, Theda; Schwarze, Stefan
    Abstract: The use of improved crop varieties is key to increasing food production, but in Sub- Saharan Africa traditional varieties still dominate smallholder farming. Lack of information is a major constraint to the adoption of improved varieties and the role of social networks in their diffusion is increasingly being studied. Social networks can, however, also affect the efficiency with which farmers use these technologies. In this paper we investigate the influence of social networks on technical efficiency of smallholder cereal producers. Using the case of Tanzania, we apply stochastic frontier analysis on data from sorghum and maize producers. Results show that the effects of social networks on efficiency differ by crop. Inter-village networks positively influence technical efficiency of improved sorghum varieties, but have no effect in case of maize. We further find that links to public extension officers increase efficiency of improved maize varieties. Some wider research and policy implications are discussed.
    Keywords: Improved varieties, social networks, information, technical efficiency, stochastic frontier, Agribusiness, Research and Development/Tech Change/Emerging Technologies, D24, D83, O33, Q16,
    Date: 2015–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:iaae15:230221&r=net

This nep-net issue is ©2016 by Yi-Nung Yang. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.