|
on Marketing |
Issue of 2013‒10‒02
three papers chosen by Joao Carlos Correia Leitao University of Beira Interior and Technical University of Lisbon |
By: | Hiew, Lee-Chea; Puah, Chin-Hong; Habibullah, Muzafar Shah |
Abstract: | Using the consumer theory approach as suggested by Habibullah (2009), this study aims to shed new light on monetary authority by incorporating advertising expenditure, a variable that has been neglected in the past, into study of the money demand function in Indonesia. In addition, different measurements of monetary aggregates (simple-sum and Divisia money) have been used in the estimation to provide better insight into the selection of a suitable monetary policy variable for the case of Indonesia. Empirical findings from the error-correction model (ECM) indicate that the advertising expenditure variable has a significant impact on the demand for money. Furthermore, as compared to simple-sum money, the model that used Divisia monetary aggregates rendered more plausible estimation results in the estimation of money demand function. |
Keywords: | Advertising Expenditure, Divisia Money, Money Demand |
JEL: | C43 E41 M37 |
Date: | 2013 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:50223&r=mkt |
By: | Dev Nathan; Yang Fuquan; Yu Yin |
Abstract: | Abstract This paper deals with the impact of competition on the tourism network in China. It identifies the supply and demand conditions among service providers, tour operators and tourists that have led to the zero-fee tour and then deals with the impact of this intense price competition in terms of the reduction in product quality and degrading of the whole network. The paper also deals with various attempts by local governments and others to curb the zero-fee tour. It points out that price restrictions have worked in a destination that has established a brand value and, thus, has become a differentiated product. In concluding, the paper deals with the supply reductions that are needed to reduce price competition in various segments of the tourism network. |
Date: | 2013 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bwp:bwppap:ctg-2013-28&r=mkt |
By: | Sumit Agarwal; Souphala Chomsisengphet; Neale Mahoney; Johannes Stroebel |
Abstract: | We analyze the effectiveness of consumer financial regulation by considering the 2009 Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure (CARD) Act in the United States. Using a unique panel data set covering over 150 million credit card accounts, we find that regulatory limits on credit card fees reduced overall borrowing costs to consumers by an annualized 2.8% of average daily balances, with a decline of more than 10% for consumers with the lowest FICO scores. Consistent with a model of low fee salience and limited market competition, we find no evidence of an offsetting increase in interest charges or a reduction in access to credit. Taken together, we estimate that the CARD Act fee reductions have saved U.S. consumers $20.8 billion per year. We also analyze the CARD Act requirement to disclose the interest savings from paying off balances in 36 months rather than only making minimum payments. We find that this "nudge" increased the number of account holders making the 36-month payment value by 0.5 percentage points, with a similarly sized decrease in the number of account holders paying less than this amount. |
JEL: | D0 D14 G0 G02 G21 G28 L0 L13 L15 |
Date: | 2013–09 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19484&r=mkt |