| By: | Luminita Postelnicu | 
| Abstract: | Microfinance Performance and Social Capital: A Cross-country AnalysisThis 
paper investigates the relationship between the extent to which social capital 
formation is facilitated within different societies, and the financial and 
social performance of MFIs. We carry out a cross-country analysis on a dataset 
containing 100 countries. We identify different social dimensions that we use 
as proxies for how easy social capital can be developed in different 
countries, and we hypothesize that microfinance is more successful, both in 
terms of their financial and social aims, in societies that are more conducive 
to the development of social capital. Our empirical results support our 
hypothesis. | 
| Abstract: | Defining Social Collateral in Microfinance Group Lending: Microfinance group 
lending with joint liability allows asset-poor individuals to replace physical 
collateral by social collateral. This paper provides a theoretical framework 
to evaluate the impact of social collateral pledged by group borrowers on 
group lending repayment. We take into account the external ties of group 
borrowers, i.e. the social ties linking borrowers to non-borrowers from their 
community, whereas previous work in this field has looked solely at internal 
ties (i.e. ties between group members). Our model stresses the impact of 
network configuration on the amount of social capital pledged as collateral. 
It shows why the group lending methodology works better in rural areas than in 
urban areas, namely because rural social networks are typically denser than 
urban ones, which results in higher social collateral. | 
| Abstract: | The Economic Value of Social Capital:Empirical studies on the importance of 
social capital for poor households show divergent outcomes. This divergence 
may stem from the lack of a conceptual framework for capturing the social 
capital dimensions that deliver economic value to individuals. This paper 
defines individual social capital from an economic perspective and proposes a 
measurement based on the two dimensions of individual social capital that 
bring economic value to individuals: (1) informal risk insurance arrangements 
and (2) information advantages that arise from personal social networks. Using 
this measurement, I present a numerical application to argue that differing 
network configurations drive asymmetry of social interactions among 
individuals. | 
| Abstract: | Social Capital and the Repayment of Microfinance Group Lending: A Case Study 
of Pro Mujer Mexico:In this paper, we investigate how social networks of group 
borrowers come into play in joint liability group lending. We use a large, 
original dataset with 802 mapped social networks of borrowers from Pro Mujer 
Mexico. We are the first to examine external ties, that is, social ties with 
individuals outside the borrowing group. We have two main findings. First, 
borrowers with stronger informal risk insurance arrangements are in better 
economic shape and have a higher capacity to pay than borrowers with weaker 
informal risk insurance arrangements. Second, borrowers who pledge valuable 
ties as social collateral have fewer repayment problems. We postulate that 
borrowers receive effective help from their ties in cases of need. | 
| Keywords: | microfinance; social collateral; social capital; group lending; social capital measurement | 
| Date: | 2016–01–20 | 
| URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/223521&r=mfd |