nep-mfd New Economics Papers
on Microfinance
Issue of 2015‒07‒11
three papers chosen by
Aastha Pudasainee and Olivier Dagnelie


  1. The Effect of Savings Accounts on Interpersonal Financial Relationships: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Rural Kenya By Dupas, Pascaline; Keats, Anthony; Robinson, Jonathan
  2. Business Training Allocation and Credit Scoring: Theory and Evidence from Microcredit in France By Renaud Bourlès; Anastasia Cozarenco; Dominique Henriet; Xavier Joutard
  3. Enforcing Repayment: Social Sanctions versus Individual Incentives By Arup Daripa

  1. By: Dupas, Pascaline; Keats, Anthony; Robinson, Jonathan
    Abstract: The welfare impact of expanding access to bank accounts depends on whether accounts crowd out pre-existing financial relationships, or whether private gains from accounts are shared within social networks. To study the effect of accounts on financial linkages, we provided free bank accounts to a random subset of 885 households. Within households, we randomized which spouse was offered an account and find no evidence of negative spillovers to spouses. Across households, we document positive spillovers: treatment households become less reliant on grown children and siblings living outside their village, and become more supportive of neighbors and friends within their village.
    Keywords: financial access; social insurance; spillovers
    JEL: C93 D14 G21 O16
    Date: 2015–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:10689&r=mfd
  2. By: Renaud Bourlès; Anastasia Cozarenco; Dominique Henriet; Xavier Joutard
    Abstract: The microcredit market, where inexperienced micro-borrowers meet experienced microfinance institutions (MFIs), is subject to reversed asymmetric information. Thus, MFIs' choices can shape borrowers' beliefs and their behavior. We analyze how this mechanism may influencemicrofinance institution decisions to allocate business training. By means of a theoretical model, we show that superior can lead the MFI not to train (or to train less) riskier borrowers. We then investigate whether this mechanism is empirically relevant, using data from a French MFI.Confirming our theoretical reasoning, we find a non-monotonic relationship between the MFI's decision to train and the risk that micro-borrowers represent.
    Keywords: microcredit; reversed asymmetric information; looking-glass self; bivariate probit; scoring model
    JEL: C34 C41 D82 G21
    Date: 2015–07–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/206494&r=mfd
  3. By: Arup Daripa (Department of Economics, Mathematics & Statistics, Birkbeck)
    Abstract: We study repayment incentives generated through social sanctions and under pure in- dividual liability. In our model agents are heterogeneous, with differing degrees of risk aversion. We consider a simple setting in which agents might strategically default from a loan program. We remove the usual assumption of exogenous social penalties, and consider the endogenous penalty of exclusion from an underlying social cooperation game, modeled here as social risk-sharing. For some types of agents social risk-sharing can be sustained by the threat of exclusion from this arrangement. These types have social capital and can be given a loan that bootstraps on the risk-sharing game by using the threat of exclusion from social risk-sharing to deter strategic default. We show that the use of such sanctions can only cover a fraction of types participating in social risk sharing. Further, coverage is decreasing in loan duration. We then show that an individual loan programaugmented by a compulsory illiquid savings plan (such schemes are used by the Grameen Bank) can deliver greater coverage, and can even cover types excluded from social risk-sharing (i.e. types for whom social penalties are not available at all). Further, the coverage of an individual loan program has the desirable property of increasing with loan size as well as loan duration. Finally, we show that social cooperation enhances the performance of individual loans. Thus fostering social cooperation is beneficial under individual liability loans even though it has limited usefulness as a penalty under social enforcement of repayment. The results offer an explanation for the Grameen Bank’s adoption of individual liability replacing group liability in its loan programs since 2002.
    Keywords: Strategic default, social cooperation, social penalties, individual liability, loan coverage, loan duration, loan size.
    JEL: O12
    Date: 2015–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bbk:bbkefp:1509&r=mfd

This nep-mfd issue is ©2015 by Aastha Pudasainee and Olivier Dagnelie. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.