New Economics Papers
on Microfinance
Issue of 2010‒05‒29
two papers chosen by
Aastha Pudasainee and Olivier Dagnelie


  1. Evaluating the Health Effects of Micro Health Insurance Placement: Evidence from Bangladesh By Jennifer Roberts; Paul Mosley; Syed Abdul Hammid
  2. Changing the Risk at the Margin Smallholder Farming and Public Policy in Developing Countries By Mannberg, Camilla

  1. By: Jennifer Roberts (Department of Economics, The University of Sheffield Author-Person=pro228); Paul Mosley (Department of Economics, The University of Sheffield); Syed Abdul Hammid
    Abstract: We examine the impact of micro health insurance placement on health awareness, healthcare utilization and health status of microcredit members in rural Bangladesh, using data from 329 households in the operating areas of Grameen Bank. The results are based on econometric analysis conditioned on placement of the scheme, and show that placement has a positive association with all of the outcomes. The results are statistically significant for health awareness and healthcare utilization, but not for heath status. Our study makes an important contribution to the literature as it provides evidence on the impact of MHI on a broad set of health outcomes.
    Keywords: Microcredit, Micro Health Insurance, Grameen Bank, Bangladesh
    JEL: O12
    Date: 2010–04
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:shf:wpaper:2010009&r=mfd
  2. By: Mannberg, Camilla (Department of Economics, Umeå University)
    Abstract: This thesis consists of a summary and four self-contained papers. Paper [I] examines whether the implementation of a social safety net programme in Ethiopia has affected the value, risk and composition of farmers’ crop portfolios. The empirical analysis suggests that the value and risk of the crop portfolio have not been altered due to the programme. However, the programme seems to have brought about some changes in the land allocated to different crops. Paper [II] studies how a social safety net affects farmers’ (dis)investments in productive assets. More specifically, it studies how the Productive Safety Net Programme in Ethiopia has changed livestock and tree holdings. The results indicate no significant effect on livestock holdings, but a significant increase in tree holdings. Paper [III] investigates if there is a problem of adverse selection in formal microlending in rural Bangladesh. The results indicate that farmers who only borrow formally have a shadow price of capital that is substantially higher than the average informal interest rate. This suggests that farmers that only borrow formally are perceived as poor credit risks by informal lenders. Paper [IV] explores the economic incentives surrounding the cultivation of opium poppy in Afghanistan. Specifically, it examines the impact of eradication policies when opium is used as a means of obtaining credit, and when the crops are produced in sharecropping arrangements. The results indicate that both these features are likely to affect the outcome of eradication policies.
    Keywords: Smallholder farming; Public policy; Informal risk strategies; Microcredit; Opium eradication; Development economics; Food policy
    JEL: O22 Q12 Q18 Q18 Q28
    Date: 2010–05–19
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:umnees:0810&r=mfd

This issue is ©2010 by Aastha Pudasainee and Olivier Dagnelie. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.