New Economics Papers
on Microfinance
Issue of 2006‒07‒15
two papers chosen by
Aastha Pudasainee and Ana Ogarrio


  1. Insurance for the Poor? By Stefan Dercon (QEH), Tessa Bold, Cesar Calvo
  2. Membership Based Indigenous Insurance Associationsin Ethiopia and Tanzania By Stefan Dercon (QEH), Joachim De Weerdt, Tessa Bold, Alula Pankhurst

  1. By: Stefan Dercon (QEH), Tessa Bold, Cesar Calvo
    Abstract: Uninsured risk has substantial welfare costs, not just in the short run, but also in terms of perpetuating poverty. This paper discusses the scope for extending insurance to the poor in LAC countries. It is argued that insurance provision to the poor could play an important role in a comprehensive system of protection against risk, including other ex-ante measures such as promoting credit and savings as insurance, as well as a credible overall ex-post safety net. Insurance provision is best promoted via a partner-agent model, in which a local finance institution with close links to relatively poor communities teams up with an established insurer to deliver low cost, tailored products, and possible products include life, health, property and weather insurance. An essential role of the government would be to promote insurance provision to the poor by a relevant regulatory framework favouring MFIs within a partner-agent setup, and to provide overall credibility to the overall system of social protection. The paper also argues for the involvement of local indigenous risk-sharing and finance institutions as intermediaries to maximise the ability to reach the poor and the overall welfare benefits
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:qeh:qehwps:qehwps125&r=mfd
  2. By: Stefan Dercon (QEH), Joachim De Weerdt, Tessa Bold, Alula Pankhurst
    Abstract: Indigenous insurance associations are a prevalent form of membership based organisations of the poor, at least in the rural areas in Ethiopia and Tanzania surveyed by the authors. Results show how villagers with few links to any formal kind of insurance market have established membership-based indigenous insurance associations to protect themselves against unexpected expenditures, mainly for funerals and hospitalisation. Many of these institutions tend to co-exist within the same community and are based on well-defined rules and regulations, well beyond informal reciprocal relations. They tend to offer premium-based insurance for funeral expenses, as well as, in many cases, other forms of insurance and credit to help address hardship. These groups are completely owned and managed by their members. They were locally initiated and have been continually developing through the actions of their own members, without involvement from the government or donors. Using detailed group membership data linked to household survey data we show that (i) these institutions are widely prevalent in the surveyed areas, (ii) households typically belong to several groups at the same time, (iii) they display a large degree of inclusiveness and (iv) they insure an important part of some shocks, but still leave households prone to the effects of risk
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:qeh:qehwps:qehwps126&r=mfd

This issue is ©2006 by Aastha Pudasainee and Ana Ogarrio. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.