New Economics Papers
on Microfinance
Issue of 2005‒02‒13
three papers chosen by
Aastha Pudasainee and Iman van Lelyveld


  1. Community empowerment and scaling-up in urban areas By Garrett, James
  2. Community-driven development and scaling-up of microfinance services By Sharma, Manohar P.
  3. Sustainability of Microfinance Self Help Groups in India: Would Federating Help? By Ajai Nair

  1. By: Garrett, James
    Abstract: "CARE began PROSPECT (Program of Support for Poverty Elimination and Community Transformation) in 1998. PROSPECT aims to reduce poverty in peri-urban areas of Lusaka. It employs a community-based approach to carry out three types of activities: social empowerment (institution building at the local level), personal empowerment (microfinance), and infrastructure improvement (mostly water supply schemes). PROSPECT has attempted to carry out these activities largely through its support of area-based organizations (ABOs) that now form part of city government. The zone development committees (ZDCs) and residents' development committees (RDCs) are the basic components of the ABO structure. These are community-level representations of municipal government; they are the community's mechanisms for expressing its voice and driving development. PROSPECT is itself an extension of an earlier project, PUSH II (Peri-Urban Self-Help Project). PUSH II and PROSPECT are fundamentally about developing community-based and community-driven development (CDD) mechanisms and strengthening community capacities to identify and respond to community needs. The paper examines the scaling-up experience of PUSH II and PROSPECT, looking especially at the mechanisms of CDD, the ABOs." Authors' Abstract
    Keywords: CARE ,Poverty alleviation ,Community organizations ,Urban poor ,Peri-urban areas ,
    Date: 2004
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fpr:fcnddp:177&r=mfd
  2. By: Sharma, Manohar P.
    Abstract: "This case study examines the scaling-up experiences of two microfinance institutions: the Nirdhan Utthan Bank Limited (NUBL) in Nepal and the Self-Help Group (SHG)-Bank linkage program of the National Agricultural Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD) in India. Both NUBL and NABARD groups use self-regulation (peer selection, peer monitoring, and peer enforcement of contracts) as key to gaining access to services not otherwise available to them.... The NABARD experience is government-led. NUBL, on the other hand, was established as an alternative to government action. In both cases, government policy in the form of mandatory "priority sector" credit played and continues to play a critical role in facilitating expansion. The subsidy content (explicit and implicit) of both NUBL and the NABARD program is quite high, and continued expansion of both programs is highly conditional on whether the policy regime of directed credit continues. Any change in this policy will deal a severe blow to both of these institutions." from Authors' Abstract
    Keywords: Microfinance ,Community participation ,Scaling up ,
    Date: 2004
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fpr:fcnddp:178&r=mfd
  3. By: Ajai Nair
    Abstract: The major form of microfinance in India is that based on women’s Self Help Groups (SHGs), which are small groups of 10–20 members. These groups collect savings from their members and provide loans to them. However, unlike most accumulating savings and credit associations (ASCAs) found in several countries, these groups also obtain loans from banks and on-lend them to their members. By 2003, over 700,000 groups had obtained over Rs.20 billion (US$425 million) in loans from banks benefiting more than 10 million people. Delinquencies on these loans are reported to be less than 5 percent. Savings in these groups is estimated to be at least Rs.8 billion (US$170 million). Despite these considerable achievements, sustainability of the SHGs has been suspect because several essential services required by the SHGs are provided free or at a significantly subsidized cost by organizations that have developed these groups. A few promoter organizations have, however, developed federations of SHGs that provide these services and others that SHG members need, but which SHGs cannot feasibly provide. Using a case study approach, Nair explores the merits and constraints of federating. Three SHG federations that provide a wide range of services are studied. The findings suggest that federations could help SHGs become institutionally and financially sustainable because they provide the economies of scale that reduce transaction costs and make the provision of these services viable. But their sustainability is constrained by several factors—both internal, related to the federations themselves, and external, related to the other stakeholders. The author concludes by recommending some actions to address these constraints. This paper—a product of the Finance and Private Sector Development Unit, South Asia Region—is part of a larger effort in the region to study access to finance in India.
    Keywords: Domestic Finance; Poverty; Rural Development; Social Development
    Date: 2005–02–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3516&r=mfd

This issue is ©2005 by Aastha Pudasainee and Iman van Lelyveld. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.