Abstract: |
We examine empirically how legal origin, creditor rights, property rights,
legal formalism, and financial development affect the design of price and
non-price terms of bank loans in almost 60 countries. Our results support the
law and finance view that private contracts reflect differences in legal
protection of creditors and the enforcement of contracts. Loans made to
borrowers in countries where creditors can seize collateral in case of default
are more likely to be secured, have longer maturity, and have lower interest
rates. We also find evidence, however, that ?Coasian? bargaining can partially
offset weak legal or institutional arrangements. For example, lenders mitigate
risks associated with weak property rights and government corruption by
securing loans with collateral and shortening maturity. Our results also
suggest that the choice of loan ownership structure affects loan contract
terms. |