nep-ltv New Economics Papers
on Unemployment, Inequality and Poverty
Issue of 2026–01–19
three papers chosen by
Maximo Rossi, Universidad de la RepÃúºblica


  1. Intergenerational Mobility in Welfare: Wages and Amenities By Khorunzhina, Natalia; Wedewer, Jesse; Wu, Runling
  2. Racial Inequality and Redistribution in Post-Apartheid South Africa By Léo Czajka; Amory Gethin
  3. Marriage, Labor Supply and the Dynamics of the Social Safety Net By Hamish Low; Costas Meghir; Luigi Pistaferri; Alessandra Voena

  1. By: Khorunzhina, Natalia (Department of Economics, Copenhagen Business School); Wedewer, Jesse (Duke University); Wu, Runling (Duke University)
    Abstract: Measures of intergenerational mobility primarily focus on earnings and often overlook substantial heterogeneity in job amenities. We propose a novel measure of intergenera-tional welfare mobility, “value-value” slope, including both pecuniary and non-pecuniary value of a job. We apply a revealed preference approach to construct common rankings of jobs based on worker flows. Using Danish administrative data, we document that there is 31% more intergenerational mobility than earnings-based mobility measures alone would suggest: the value-value slope is 0.105 and the wage-premia slope is 0.151. Importantly, this aggregate pattern masks striking gender differences: comparing within each gender, daughters exhibit 38% greater mobility in total welfare than in wages; for sons, the two measures nearly align. Gender differences trace to how family background shapes educa-tional and occupational paths. Daughters pursue academic tracks and enter white-collar jobs with similar amenities at high rates regardless of background. Sons’ paths are more stratified: those from disadvantaged families disproportionately follow vocational routes into blue-collar work, where both wages and amenities differ sharply from the professional jobs that advantaged sons obtain.
    Keywords: Intergenerational mobility; earnings inequality; amenities
    JEL: D31 J30 J62
    Date: 2025–12–27
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:cbsnow:2026_001
  2. By: Léo Czajka (EU Tax Observatory – Paris School of Economics); Amory Gethin (World Bank and Paris School of Economics – World Inequality Lab)
    Abstract: We study post-Apartheid inequality dynamics in South Africa using a new microdatabase that combines survey, tax, national accounts, and budget data from 1993 to 2019. Until 2005, pretax inequality rose, racial disparities widened, and redistribution stagnated. Thereafter, pretax inequality fell back toward its 1993 level, while major expansions in tax-and-transfer progressivity sharply reduced posttax inequality. Rapid growth of top Black incomes contributed to halving the White-to-Black pretax income ratio and shifted 20% of taxes from Whites to top Black earners. Despite reaching its lowest point in history in 2019, the racial gap remains extreme by international standards, even after redistribution.
    Keywords: Income Inequality, Taxation and Redistribution, Racial Inequality
    JEL: D31 H23 I32
    Date: 2025–12
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dbp:wpaper:040
  3. By: Hamish Low (University of Oxford); Costas Meghir (Yale University); Luigi Pistaferri (Stanford University); Alessandra Voena (Stanford University)
    Abstract: This paper studies the impact of the social safety net on marriage, labor supply, and divorce. We specify and estimate a life-cycle model of single and married individuals to evaluate the welfare and behavioral effects of the 1996 PRWORA reform, which introduced time limits and work requirements. The model incorporates limited commitment between spouses, endogenous marriage and divorce, and human capital accumulation. We find that the reform led to a significant decline in welfare participation, an increase in employment, and a decrease in divorce rates, particularly for lower-educated women. Our results highlight the importance of accounting for the long-run impacts on household formation and intra-household insurance when evaluating welfare policy.
    Date: 2025–11–01
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cwl:cwldpp:2121r3

This nep-ltv issue is ©2026 by Maximo Rossi. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.