nep-lam New Economics Papers
on Central and South America
Issue of 2006‒09‒11
one paper chosen by
Maximo Rossi
Universidad de la Republica

  1. Local inequality and project choice : theory and evidence from Ecuador By Araujo, M. Caridad; Ferreira, Francisco H.G.; Lanjouw, Peter; Ozler, Berk

  1. By: Araujo, M. Caridad; Ferreira, Francisco H.G.; Lanjouw, Peter; Ozler, Berk
    Abstract: This paper provides evidence consistent with elite capture of Social Fund investment projects in Ecuador. Exploiting a unique combination of data-sets on village-level income distributions, Social Fund project administration, and province level electoral results, the authors test a simple model of project choice when local political power is unequally distributed. In accordance with the predictions of the model, poorer villages are more likely to receive projects that provide excludable (private) goods to the poor, such as latrines. Controlling for poverty, more unequal communities are less likely to receive such projects. Consistent with the hypothesis of elite capture, these results are sensitive to the specific measure of inequality used in the empirical analysis, and are strongest for expenditure shares at the top of the distribution.
    Keywords: Rural Poverty Reduction,Economic Theory & Research,Population Policies,Services & Transfers to Poor,Poverty Monitoring & Analysis
    Date: 2006–08–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:3997&r=lam

This nep-lam issue is ©2006 by Maximo Rossi. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.